• • 上一篇    下一篇

鼠类对山杏和辽东栎种子的贮藏

路纪琪  张知彬   

  1. 中国科学院动物研究所农业虫鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2005-07-14 发布日期:2008-07-07

Seed-hoarding Behavior of Wild Apricot and Liaodong Oak by Small Rodents

LU Jiqi ZHANG Zhibin   

  • Online:2005-07-14 Published:2008-07-07

摘要: 在北京市东灵山地区, 选择灌丛生境, 人工释放山杏和辽东栎种子, 对两种种子在释放处被鼠类就地取
食、存留动态、种子被搬运和贮藏的距离、位置、状态、微生境等进行了分析比较。采用活捕饲喂和咬痕比较的方法, 对野外取食山杏和辽东栎种子的鼠类进行了鉴定。结果表明: 1) 取食山杏和辽东栎种子的鼠类主要是大林姬鼠和岩松鼠; 2) 山杏种子被鼠类搬运的平均距离大于辽东栎种子, 两种种子大多数被搬运至21 m 之内,在9 m之内最为集中; 3) 山杏种子的中位存留时间较辽东栎种子长; 4) 在释放处, 鼠类对辽东栎种子的就地取食强度(54.83 %) 大于对山杏种子的取食(0.17 %) ; 5) 在搬运之后, 大部分山杏种子被埋藏起来, 仅有3 粒被取食; 而辽东栎种子大部分被取食; 6) 鼠类趋向于把种子搬运到灌丛下方或灌丛边缘进行贮藏或取食。山杏种子在贮藏点的数量为1~3 粒, 而辽东栎种子在贮藏点的数量均为1 粒。

关键词: 山杏, 辽东栎, 种子, 鼠类, 食物贮藏行为

Abstract: In Donglingshan mountain (40°00′N , 115°30′E) , a mountainous area of Mentougou District of Beijing , China , we chose 30 seed releasing plots in a shrub community and released seeds of wild apricot ( Prunus armeniaca) and Liaodong oak(Quercus liaotungensis) , labeled with small pieces of coded tin-tags to investigate and compare the seeds of these two species eaten on the spot and survival dynamics and the distance , location and status of seed-transported. Furthermore , we identified rodent species by using comparison of gnawing marks on seeds of wild apricot made by different rodents. On 10th October 2002 , we released seeds of wild apricot and Liaodong oak , with an interval of 1 m between releasing places of them , on the ground surface in each plot , and checked the seed fate daily for 16 days. The recording items included number of seed-remained , transporting distance and micro-habitat and status of the seeds after transport. The micro-habitats were classified into four categories (Under shrub , US; Shrub edge , SE; Grass , G and Bare ground , BG). The statuses of those seeds being removed were defined as four types (Buried , B ; Surface , S; Eaten , E and Missing , M). SPSS for Windows (Version 10.0) was used in the analysis of data : survival analysis was used to analyze the remaining dynamics of the experimental seeds in the releasing place ; Kolmogorove-Smirnov test was used to determine the distribution of all data ; Mann-Whitney U was used to test the significant level of transporting distance between the removed seeds of wild apricot and Liaodong oak ; One-way ANOVA was used once the distribution pattern of data were normal. Chi-square test was used to determine if the two kinds of transported seed distributed randomly within four categories of microhabitats. The main results of this study are as follows : 1) Apodemus peninsulae and Sciurotamias davidianus are key rodent species acting on seeds of wild apricot and Liaodong oak in the study area ; 2) in releasing plots , the intensity of seeds of Liaodong oak were consumed is higher (54.38 %) than that of wild apricot (0.17 %) , the median survival time of released seed of wild apricot and Liaodong oak are 7.89 days and 7.73 days , respectively ; 3) the mean transport distance of seeds of wild apricot is longer than that of Liaodong oak ; 4) after transported by rodents , more seeds of wild apricot than seeds of Liaodong oak were buried within the micro2habitats of US and SE and 5) the cache size of seeds of wild apricot is 1 - 3 seeds with the majority of one seed , while the all caches of Liaodong oak has one seed only.

Key words: Wild apricot, Liaodong oak, Seeds, Rodents, Food2hoarding behavior