兽类学报 >

2023 , Vol. 43 >Issue 4: 364 - 377

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16829/j.slxb.150745

研究论文

四川八月林自然保护区大灵猫日活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动响应的初步研究

  • 林炜明 ,
  • 翁悦 ,
  • 阿家 ,
  • 王敏 ,
  • 王琦 ,
  • 王放
展开
  • 1 复旦大学生命科学学院, 上海 200438;
    2 桃花源八月林保护中心, 乐山 614700
林炜明(2000-)，男，硕士研究生，主要从事保护生物学和生物多样性研究.

收稿日期: 2022-10-25

  修回日期: 2023-03-13

  网络出版日期: 2023-08-02

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(31971537)

收起

Preliminary research on daily activity rhythm, habitat use and response to human activity of large Indian civet (Viverra zibetha) in Bayuelin Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province

  • LIN Weiming ,
  • WENG Yue ,
  • A Jia ,
  • WANG Min ,
  • WANG Qi ,
  • WANG Fang
Expand
  • 1 School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China;
    2 Bayuelin Eco-conservation Center of Paradise Foundation, Leshan 614700, China

Received date: 2022-10-25

  Revised date: 2023-03-13

  Online published: 2023-08-02

Fold

摘要

大灵猫(Viverra zibetha)是灵猫科的一种小型食肉动物，曾广泛分布于我国南方，但20世纪中后期以来其国内分布区域快速退缩，种群可能处于严重下降状态。为了填补我国大灵猫生态学研究空缺带来的保护和管理挑战，本研究在四川省八月林自然保护区开展了为期一年半的红外相机调查，共布设红外相机100台，获取19 912个相机日的红外相机照片，在23个位点完成大灵猫的独立探测77次。本研究采用非参数核密度指数法研究了大灵猫与同域小型食肉动物的日活动节律，构建占域模型评估了大灵猫的栖息地利用，并重点分析了大灵猫对人类活动的响应。结果显示大灵猫日活动节律为严格夜行性，与严格夜行性的花面狸(Paguma larvata)(Δ=0.88,P=0.290)和夜行偏晨昏性的猪獾(Arctonyx collaris)(Δ=0.80,P=0.056)日活动节律重叠程度最高，与夜行偏晨昏性的豹猫(Prionailurus bengalensis)(Δ=0.73,P=0.002)和严格夜行性的鼬獾(Melogale moschata)(Δ=0.72,P<0.001)日活动节律存在显著差异，而与昼行性的中华小熊猫(Ailurus styani)(Δ=0.19,P<0.001)和黄喉貂(Martes flavigula)(Δ=0.16,P<0.001)日活动节律重叠程度低。占域模型显示大灵猫栖息地利用与坡度呈负相关，与潜在猎物相对多度呈正相关。在八月林区域大灵猫多分布于距离河流较近、乔木层较低矮的人工针叶林中，对竹林有明显的回避。同时，占域模型显示大灵猫对不同类型人类活动的响应存在显著差异，多利用距离道路较近和人类活动较多的区域，但回避散养家犬的活动区域。本研究初步填补了近年对大灵猫的野外生态研究空缺，为后续大灵猫种群生态学的深入研究提供了基础信息，为八月林保护区乃至更多区域的大灵猫保护工作提供科学支持。

关键词： 大灵猫; 占域模型; 日活动节律; 栖息地利用; 人类活动

本文引用格式

林炜明 , 翁悦 , 阿家 , 王敏 , 王琦 , 王放 . 四川八月林自然保护区大灵猫日活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动响应的初步研究[J]. 兽类学报, 2023 , 43(4) : 364 -377 . DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150745

Abstract

Large Indian civet (Viverra zibetha) is a small carnivore species of Viverridae. The species used to be widely distributed in southern China. However, its distribution range has rapidly decreased since the late 20th century and its population is believed locally extinct in many regions. The research gap in large Indian civet ecology leads to difficulties in conservation planning. Using infrared-triggered camera trapping techniques, we conducted field surveys in Bayuelin Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province, for one and a half years. We deployed 100 camera traps and collected animal records of 19 912 camera days, among which large Indian civet was detected at 23 camera traps with 77 independent detections. Non-parametric circular kernel-density method is adopted to analyze the diel activity pattern of large Indian civet and sympatric small carnivores. Occupancy model is adopted to evaluate habitat use, with additional focus on species’response to human-related interference. The study suggests that large Indian civet has a strictly nocturnal activity pattern and high temporal overlap with masked palm civet (Paguma larvata) (Δ = 0. 88, P= 0. 290), hog badger (Arctonyx collaris) (Δ = 0. 80, P= 0. 056), leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) (Δ = 0. 73, P= 0. 002) and Chinese ferret-badger (Melogale moschata) (Δ = 0. 72, P< 0. 001), but low temporal overlap with Chinese red panda (Ailurus styani) (Δ = 0. 19, P< 0. 001) and yellow-throated marten (Martes flavigula) (Δ = 0. 16, P< 0. 001). Occupancy model reveals that the habitat use of large Indian civet is negatively associated with steep slopes, positively associated with relative abundance of potential prey and close to rivers. Large Indian civet is found mainly distributed in lower coniferous forest patches, but avoids bamboo understory. The species uses landscapes close to roads and abundant in human activities, but avoids free-ranging domestic dogs. The study fills the gaps in field research on large Indian civet ecology in China, supporting conservation planning in Bayuelin Nature Reserve as well as other regions where large Indian civet is considered a conservation target.

Key words： Large Indian civet (Viverra zibetha); Occupancy model; Daily activity rhythms; Habitat use; Human activity

参考文献

Appel A, Werhahn G, Acharya R, Ghimirey Y, Adhikary B. 2013. Small carnivores in the Annapurna conservation area, Nepal. Vertebrate Zoology, 63 (1):111-121.
Bai D F, Chen Y, Li J S, Tao Q, Wang L F, Piao Y, Shi K. 2018. Mammal diversity in Shangyong Nature Reserve, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province. Biodiversity Science, 26 (1):75-78. (in Chinese)
Bist B S, Ghimire P, Sharma B, Khanal C, Subedi A. 2021. Latrine site and its use pattern by large Indian civet Viverra zibetha Linnaeus, 1758:record from camera trap. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 13 (14):20284-20287.
Bu H L, Wang F, McShea W J, Lu Z, Wang D J, Li S. 2016. Spatial co-occurrence and activity patterns of mesocarnivores in the temperate forests of southwest China. PLoS ONE, 11 (10):e0164271.
Chakravarthy D, Ratnam J. 2015. Seed dispersal of Vitex glabrata and Prunus ceylanica by civets (Viverridae) in Pakke Tiger Reserve, north-east India:spatial patterns and post-dispersal seed fates. Tropical Conservation Science, 8 (2):491-504.
Chandler R, Kellner K, Fiske I, Miller D, Royle A, Hostetler J, Hutchinson R, Smith A, Kery M, Meredith M, Fournier A, Muldoon A, Baker C. 2022. Unmarked:Models for data from unmarked animals, Version 1. 2. 3. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/unmarked. (Accessed on 2022-07-18)
Chen L J, Xiao W H, Xiao Z S. 2019. Limitations of relative abundance indices calculated from camera-trapping data. Biodiversity Science, 27 (3):243-248. (in Chinese)
Chen M T, Liang Y J, Kuo C C, Pei K J C. 2016. Home ranges, movements and activity patterns of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) and threats to them in Taiwan. Mammal Study, 41 (2):77-86.
Chuang S A, Lee L L. 1997. Food habits of three carnivore species(Viverricula indica, Herpestes urva, and Melogale moschata) in Fushan Forest, northern Taiwan. Journal of Zoology, 243 (1):71-79.
Chutipong W, Tantipisanuh N, Ngoprasert D, Lynam A J, Steinmetz R, Jenks K E, Grassman Jr L I, Tewes M, Kitamura S, Baker M C, McShea W, Bhumpakphan N, Sukmasuang R, Gale G A, Harich F K, Treydte A C, Cutter P, Cutter P B, Suwanrat S, Siripattaranukul K, Hala-Bala Wildlife Research Station, Wildlife Research Division, Duckworth J W. 2014. Current distribution and conservation status of small carnivores in Thailand:a baseline review. Small Carnivore Conservation, 51:96-136.
Chutipong W, Steinmetz R, Gale G A. 2021. Spatial capturerecapture reveals high densities of large Indian civet, an omnivorous small carnivore in Southeast Asia. Mammalian Biology, 101:831-841.
Dai B, Chen B P, Yue B S, Zeng T. 2015. A study on habitat fragmentation and conservation status of Arborophila rufipectus. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 34 (2):174-180. (in Chinese)
Efford M. 2004. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos, 106:598-610.
Erb P L, McShea W J, Guralnick R P. 2012. Anthropogenic influences on macro-level mammal occupancy in the appalachian trail corridor. PLoS ONE, 7:e42574.
Farris Z J, Gerber B D, Karpanty S, Murphy A, Wampole E, Ratelolahy F, Kelly M J. 2020. Exploring and interpreting spatiotemporal interactions between native and invasive carnivores across a gradient of rainforest degradation. Biological Invasions, 22 (6):2033-2047.
Gao Y T, Wang S, Zhang M L, Ye Z Y, Zhou J Z, Ma Y Q, Li G H, Wu J Y, Zheng Y L, Guo F Z, Xu L H, Peng H S, Wang Y X, Sheng H L, Li C Z, Fu Y Y, Wang S Y, Yan K, Zhang Y Y, Niu Y, Liu D S. 1987. Fauna Sinica·Mammalia (Vol. 8):Carnivora. Beijing:Science Press. (in Chinese)
Gray T N E, Pin C, Phan C, Crouthers R, Kamler J F, Prum S. 2014. Camera-trap records of small carnivores from eastern Cambodia, 1999-2013. Small Carnivore Conservation, 50:20-24.
Hu Q, Lin H Q, Dai Q, Yang Z S, He L Y, Zhang W, Shi X G. 2020. Niche differentiation among three middle-sized carnivores in Wolong Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 55 (6):685-691. (in Chinese)
Hua F Y, Bruijnzeel L A, Meli P, Martin P A, Zhang J, Nakagawa S, Miao X R, Wang W Y, McEvoy C, Peña-Arancibia J L, Brancalion P H S, Smith P, Edwards D P, Balmford A. 2022. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science, 376 (6595):839-844.
James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2021. An Introduction to Statistical Learning. 2nd ed. New York:Springer.
Jennings A P, Veron G. 2011. Predicted distributions and ecological niches of 8 civet and mongoose species in Southeast Asia. Journal of Mammalogy, 92 (2):316-327.
Kilgo J C, Ray H S, Vukovich M, Goode M J, Ruth C. 2012. Predation by coyotes on white-tailed deer neonates in South Carolina. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 76 (7):1420-1430.
Lau M W N, Fellowes J R, Chan B P L. 2010. Carnivores (Mammalia:Carnivora) in South China:a status review with notes on the commercial trade. Mammal Review, 40 (4):247-292.
Lekagul B, McNeely J A. 1977. Mammals of Thailand. Bangkok:Association for the Conservation of Wildlife.
Li S, McShea W J, Wang D J, Lu Z, Gu X D. 2012. Gauging the impact of management expertise on the distribution of large mammals across protected areas. Diversity and Distributions, 18:1166-1176.
Li Z L, Duo L A, Li S, Wang T M. 2021. Competition and coexistence among terrestrial mammalian carnivores. Biodiversity Science, 29 (1):81-97. (in Chinese)
Liu J, Ran J H, Yue X T, Mao Y M, Ma X L, Zhang Y. 2020. Diversity and changes of large and medium-sized mammals in the Heizhugou National Nature Reserve based on infrared cameras. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 39 (6):687-693. (in Chinese)
Liu X B, Zhao K H, Wang M. 2022. Using infrared camera traps to monitor the activity rhythm and spatial distribution pattern of leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) and yellow-throated marten (Martes flavigula) in Foping National Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 57 (1):9-18. (in Chinese)
Liu Y, Wang Y R, Hou G W, Liu X A, Chen C, Xiao X Y, Wang H Q. 2018. Analysis of natural population dynamics of Davidia involucrata in Bayuelin Nature Reserve. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 39 (1):87-90. (in Chinese)
MacKenzie D I, Nichols J D, Lachman G B, Droege S, Royle J A, Langtimm C A. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 83 (8):2248-2255.
Marneweck C, Butler A R, Gigliotti L C, Harris S N, Jensen A J, Muthersbaugh M, Newman B A, Saldo E A, Shute K, Titus K L, Yu S W, Jachowski D S. 2021. Shining the spotlight on small mammalian carnivores:global status and threats. Biological Conservation, 255:109005.
Meredith M, Ridout M. 2021. overlap:Estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns, Version 0. 3. 4. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/overlap. (Accessed on 2022-04-22)
Nakashima Y, Inoue E, Inoue-Murayama M, Sukor J R A. 2010. Functional uniqueness of a small carnivore as seed dispersal agents:a case study of the common palm civets in the Tabin Wildlife Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia. Oecologia, 164 (3):721-730.
National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. 2021. Category of National Key Protected Wild Animals. (in Chinese)
O'Brien T G, Kinnaird M F, Wibisono H T. 2003. Crouching tigers, hidden prey:Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation, 6 (2):131-139.
Phillips S J, Anderson R P, Schapire R E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190:231-259.
Prayong N, Stikosamatara S. 2006. Small carnivores and other mammals in a small protected area of 50 km2 in Thong Pha Phum Forest, western Thailand. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society, 54 (1):139-153.
R Core Team. 2022. R:A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 4. 1. 3. https://www.r-project.org. (Accessed on 2022-03-10)
Rabinowitz A R. 1990. Notes on the behavior and movements of leopard cats, Felis bengalensis, in a dry tropical forest mosaic in Thailand. Biotropica, 22 (4):397-403.
Rabinowitz A R. 1991. Behavior and movements of sympatric civet species in Huai-Kha-Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Journal of Zoology, 223:281-298.
Ripple W J, Estes J A, Beschta R L, Wilmers C C, Ritchie E G, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson M P, Schmitz O J, Smith D W, Wallach A D, Wirsing A J. 2014. Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science, 343(6167):1241484.
Rosenberg D M, McCully P, Pringle C M. 2000. Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alterations:Introduction. BioScience, 50 (9):746-751.
Rowcliffe M. 2022. Activity:Animal activity statistics, Version 1. 3. 2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/activity. (Accessed on 2022-08-22)
Timmins R J, Duckworth J W, Chutipong W, Ghimirey Y, Willcox D H A, Rahman H, Long B, Choudhury A. 2016. Viverra zibetha. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016, e. T41709A4522 0429.
Trisurat Y, Bhumpakphan N, Reed D H, Kanchanasaka B. 2012. Using species distribution modeling to set management priorities for mammals in northern Thailand. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20 (5):264-273.
Wang S. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals:Mammalia. Beijing:Science Press. (in Chinese)
Wang H, Fuller T K. 2003. Food habits of four sympatric carnivores in southeastern China. Mammalia, 67 (4):513-519.
Wang F, McShea W J, Wang D J, Li S, Zhao Q, Wang H, Lu Z. 2014. Evaluating landscape options for corridor restoration between giant panda reserves. PLoS ONE, 9 (8):e105086.
Wang F, McShea W J, Wang D J, Li S. 2015. Shared resources between giant panda and sympatric wild and domestic mammals. Biological Conservation, 186 (3):319-325.
Wang F, McShea W J, Li S, Wang D J. 2017. Does one size fit all? A multispecies approach to regional landscape corridor planning. Diversity and Distributions, 24:415-425.
Wen L J, Shi K, Huang J, Song Y, Guo Y M. 2014. Preliminary analysis of mammal and bird diversity monitored with camera traps in Medog, Tibet. Biodiversity Science, 22 (6):798-799. (in Chinese)
Weng Y, McShea W, Diao Y X, Yang H B, Zhang X F, Gu B J, Bu H L, Wang F. 2022. The incursion of free-ranging dogs into protected areas:A spatio-temporal analysis in a network of giant panda reserves. Biological Conservation, 265:109423.
Xiao Z S, Li X H, Wang X Z, Zhou Q H, Quan R C, Shen X L, Li S. 2014. Developing camera-trapping protocols for wildlife monitoring in Chinese forests. Biodiversity Science, 22 (6):704-711. (in Chinese)
Yang X W, Wu A K, Zou Q X, Li G R, Zhang M M, Hu C S, Shu H J. 2020. Field monitoring of mammals and birds using infrared cameras in Mayanghe National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China. Biodiversity Science, 28 (2):219-225. (in Chinese)
Yen S C, Ju Y T, Shaner P J L, Chen H L. 2019. Spatial and temporal relationship between native mammals and free-roaming dogs in a protected area surrounded by a metropolis. Scientific Reports, 9:8161.
白德凤, 陈颖, 李俊松, 陶庆, 王利繁, 飘优, 时坤. 2018. 西双版纳尚勇 自 然 保 护 区 哺 乳 动 物 物 种 多 样 性. 生 物 多 样 性, 26 (1):75-78.
刘小斌, 赵凯辉, 王勐. 2022. 利用红外相机监测数据分析佛坪国家级自然保护区豹猫和黄喉貂活动节律及空间分布. 动物学杂志, 57 (1):9-18.
刘洁, 冉江洪, 岳先涛, 毛夜明, 马晓龙, 张尧. 2020. 基于红外相机监测四川黑竹沟国家级自然保护区的大中型兽类多样性及其变化. 四川动物, 39 (6):687-693.
刘燕, 王延茹, 侯广维, 刘贤安, 陈翠, 肖喜元, 王海群. 2018. 八月林自然保护区珙桐天然种群动态分析. 四川林业科技, 39 (1):87-90.
李治霖, 多立安, 李晟, 王天明. 2021. 陆生食肉动物竞争与共存研究概述. 生物多样性, 29 (1):81-97.
杨雄威, 吴安康, 邹启先, 李光容, 张明明, 胡灿实, 粟海军. 2020. 贵州麻阳河国家级自然保护区红外相机鸟兽监测. 生物多样性, 28 (2):219-225.
肖治术, 李欣海, 王学志, 周岐海, 权锐昌, 申小莉, 李晟. 2014. 探讨我国森林野生动物红外相机监测规范. 生物多样性, 22 (6):704-711.
汪松. 1998. 中国濒危动物红皮书:兽类. 北京:科学出版社.
陈立军, 肖文宏, 肖治术. 2019. 物种相对多度指数在红外相机数据分析中的应用及局限. 生物多样性, 27 (3):243-248.
国家林业和草原局, 农业农村部. 2021. 国家重点保护野生动物名录.
胡强, 林红强, 戴强, 杨志松, 何流洋, 张文, 施小刚. 2020. 卧龙保护区三种中型食肉动物的生态位差异. 动物学杂志, 55 (6):685-691.
高耀亭, 汪松, 张曼丽, 叶宗耀, 周嘉樀, 马逸清, 李贵辉, 吴家炎, 郑永烈, 郭方正, 徐龙辉, 彭鸿绶, 王应祥, 盛和林, 李承忠, 傅毅远, 王申裕, 岩崑, 张彦荣, 牛勇, 刘大森. 1987. 中国动物志·兽纲 (第八卷):食肉目. 北京:科学出版社.
温立嘉, 时坤, 黄建, 宋阳, 郭玉民. 2014. 西藏墨脱鸟兽红外相机监测初报. 生物多样性, 22 (6):798-799.
戴波, 陈本平, 岳碧松, 曾涛. 2015. 四川山鹧鸪栖息地破碎化及保护管理状况分析. 四川动物, 34 (2):174-180.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

青公网安备 63010402000199号　青ICP备05000010号-2
　 版权所有 © 《兽类学报》杂志社
地址：青海省西宁市新宁路23号 《兽类学报》编辑部　邮编：810001
电话：+86-971-6143617　 传真：+86-971-6143282　 Email：slxb@nwipb.cas.cn
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司