研究论文

若尔盖草原湿地狼巢址选择

  • 张云巧 ,
  • 王婉 ,
  • 杨奕欣 ,
  • 周么措 ,
  • 智美吉 ,
  • 肖俊侯 ,
  • 于渊 ,
  • 张振阳 ,
  • 戴强
展开
  • 1 中国科学院成都生物研究所, 成都 610041;
    2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3 四川若尔盖湿地国家级自然保护区管理局, 若尔盖 624500;
    4 西南财经大学统计学院, 成都 611130
张云巧(2001-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事动物生态学研究.

收稿日期: 2024-06-05

  修回日期: 2024-08-29

  网络出版日期: 2024-08-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(32070520,32470536);四川若尔盖国家级自然保护区管理局项目:阿坝州狼调查(513232202200002)

Wolf (Canis lupus) den sites selection in the Ruoergai grassland wetland, Sichuan Province, China

  • ZHANG Yunqiao ,
  • WANG Wan ,
  • YANG Yixin ,
  • Zhoumecuo ,
  • Zhimeiji ,
  • XIAO Junhou ,
  • YU Yuan ,
  • ZHANG Zhenyang ,
  • DAI Qiang
Expand
  • 1 Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3 Administration Bureau of Ruoergai Wetland National Nature Reserve, Ruoergai 624500, China;
    4 School of Statistics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China

Received date: 2024-06-05

  Revised date: 2024-08-29

  Online published: 2024-08-29

摘要

若尔盖草原湿地位于青藏高原东缘,其生态功能重要、生态系统脆弱。狼作为区域中的大型食肉动物,在维持生态系统稳定中起关键作用。但目前高寒草原湿地的狼巢穴选址特征尚不明确,严重限制了该区域保护策略的制定。本研究于2022年8月至2023年5月通过样线法和红外相机调查记录到50个狼巢穴分布点,并使用逻辑斯蒂回归模型分析了影响狼巢址选择的关键因子。结果表明,狼更偏好选择在上坡或台地及山顶或高岭、坡度更陡、TRI (地形崎岖度指数)和粗糙度高的区域、距建筑物近但远离农田的区域及远离沼泽和永久水体的区域建立巢穴。各类变量中,坡向30 m分辨率、TPI (地形位置指数)(93-183)、距建筑物距离、距农田距离、距永久水体距离、距裸地距离、距裸地距离平方以及距草地距离等8个变量的重要性最高。与生活在森林和草原生态系统中的狼相比,若尔盖草原湿地的狼在巢址选择上具有一定的独特性。本研究丰富了对狼巢址选择行为的理解,也为若尔盖草原湿地狼繁殖期栖息地的保护管理提供了科学依据。

本文引用格式

张云巧 , 王婉 , 杨奕欣 , 周么措 , 智美吉 , 肖俊侯 , 于渊 , 张振阳 , 戴强 . 若尔盖草原湿地狼巢址选择[J]. 兽类学报, 2024 , 44(6) : 771 -780 . DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150965

Abstract

The Ruoergai grassland wetland is located on the eastern edge of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, with important ecological functions and fragile ecosystems. As a large carnivore in the region, wolves play a key role in maintaining ecosystem stability. However, the characteristics of wolf den site selection characteristics in the alpine grassland wetland are still unclear, which severely limits the development of conservation strategies in the region. In this study, 50 wolf den sites were recorded by line transect method and infrared camera survey from August 2022 to May 2023, and key factors affecting wolf den site selection were analyzed using logistic regression. The results showed that wolves preferred to build dens on upper slopes/mesas and mountain tops/high ridges, areas with steeper slopes, high terrain ruggedness index and roughness, areas close to buildings but away from farmland, and areas away from marshes and permanent water. Among the variables, the eight with the highest importance were 30 m resolution of slope, topographic position index, distance to buildings, distance to farmland, distance to permanent water, distance to bare, distance to bare ground squared, and distance to grassland. Compared with wolves living in forest and grassland ecosystems, wolves in the Ruoergai grassland wetlands have some uniqueness in den site selection. This study enriches the understanding of wolf den site selection behaviour and provides a scientific basis for the conservation and management of wolf breeding habitat in the Ruoergai grassland wetland.

参考文献

Ahmadi M, Kaboli M, Nourani E, Alizadeh Shabani A, Ashrafi S. 2013. A predictive spatial model for gray wolf (Canis lupus) denning sites in a human-dominated landscape in western Iran. Ecological Research, 28 (3): 513-521.
Alvarenga G C, Chiaverini L, Cushman S A, Dröge E, Macdonald D W, Kantek D L Z, Morato R G, Thompson J J, Oscar R B L M, Abade L, de Azevedo F C C, Ramalho E E, Kaszta Z. 2021.Multi-scale path-level analysis of jaguar habitat use in the Pantanal ecosystem. Biological Conservation, 253 (1). DOI: 10. 1016/j. biocon. 2020. 108900.
Anderson D R, Burnham K P, Thompson W L. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 64 (4): 912-923.
Bai J J, Hou P, Jin D D, Zhai J, Ma Y T, Zhao J J. 2022. Habitat suitability assessment of black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in the Zoige grassland wetland ecological function zone on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Diversity, 14 (7). DOI: 10. 3390/d14070579.
Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert C H, Thuiller W. 2012. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3 (2): 327-338.
Barnosky A D, Matzke N, Tomiya S, Wogan G O U, Swartz B, Quental T B, Marshall C, McGuire J L, Lindsey E L, Maguire K C, Mersey B, Ferrer E A. 2011. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471 (7336): 51-57.
Becker M S, Creel S, Sichande M, de Merkle J R, Goodheart B, Mweetwa T, Mwape H, Smit D, Kusler A, Banda K, Musalo B, Bwalya L M, McRobb R. 2024. Wire-snare bushmeat poaching and the large African carnivore guild: Impacts, knowledge gaps, and field-based mitigation. Biological Conservation, 289 (1).DOI: 10. 1016/j. biocon. 2023. 110376.
Beers A T, Frey S N. 2022. Greater sage-grouse habitat selection varies across the marginal habitat of its lagging range margin. Ecosphere, 13 (7). DOI: 10. 1002/ ecs2. 4146.
Benson J F, Mills K J, Patterson B R. 2015. Resource selection by wolves at dens and rendezvous sites in Algonquin park, Canada.
Biological Conservation, 182 (2): 223-232.
Burnham K P, Anderson D R. 2002. Introduction, model selection and multimodel inference, model selection and multimodel inference.Springer.
Cai X, Jin S R. 1963. Types of swamps in the Ruoergai Plateau and the occurrence and development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 29(3): 219-240. (in Chinese)
Ciucci P, Boitani L, Falco M, Maiorano L. 2018. Hierarchical, multigrain rendezvous site selection by wolves in southern Italy. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 82 (5): 1049-1061.
Cui S H, Wu H, Pei X J, Yang Q W, Huang R Q, Guo B. 2022. Characterizing the spatial distribution, frequency, geomorphological and geological controls on landslides triggered by the 1933 Mw 7. 3 Diexi Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Geomorphology, 403 (8).DOI: 10. 1016/j. geomorph. 2022. 108177.
Du C C, Chu W W, Zhen R, Duan X N, Chen G, Chu H J. 2017. Castor fiber birulai lodge site selection and characteristics in the Ulungur watershed of Xinjiang, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(15): 5167-5178. (in Chinese)
Eriksen A, Wabakken P, Maartmann E, Zimmermann B. 2018. Den site selection by male brown bears at the population’s expansion front. PLoS ONE, 13 (8). DOI: 10. 137/journal. pone. 0202653.
Fang Y, Zhang X X, Guo C Q. 2020. Habitat suitability of blacknecked cranes (Grus nigricollis) in Zoige wetland. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 39 (9): 3021-3031. (in Chinese)
Frank H, Frank M G, Hasselbach L M, Littleton D M. 1989. Motivation and insight in wolf (Canis lupus) and Alaskan malamute (Canis familiaris): Visual discrimination learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27 (5): 455-458.
He X L, Lu S Y, Huang Z H, Li Y B. 2021. Habitat selection and use of a group of white-headed langurs (Trachypithecus leucocephalus) in Fusui, Guangxi, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41 (21):8664-8672. (in Chinese)
Home C, Jhala Y V. 2010. Estimating breeding pair densities of the Indian fox in Kutch, Gujarat, India. Canid News, 13 (2): 1-6.
Hosmer Jr D W, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R X. 2013. Applied logisticregression. John Wiley & Sons.
Iliopoulos Y, Youlatos D, Sgardelis S. 2014. Wolf pack rendezvous site selection in Greece is mainly affected by anthropogenic landscape features. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 60 (1):23-34.
Joly K, Sorum M S, Cameron M D. 2018. Denning ecology of wolves in east-central Alaska, 1993-2017. Arctic, 71 (4): 444-455.
Khan M R, Mahmood T, Fatima H, Akrim F, Andleeb S, Hamid A. 2020. Distribution, diet menu and human conflict of grey wolf Canis lupus in Mahoodand Valley, Swat District, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 52 (1): 179-191.
Klaczek M R, Johnson C J, Cluff H D. 2015. Den site selection of wolves (Canis lupus) in response to declining caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) density in the central Canadian Arctic.Polar Biology, 38 (12): 2007-2019.
Kojola I, Hallikainen V, Mikkola K, Gurarie E, Heikkinen S, Kaartinen S, Nikula A, Nivala V. 2016. Wolf visitations close to human residences in Finland: the role of age, residence density, and time of day. Biological Conservation, 198 (6): 9-14.
Leclerc M, Dussault C, St-Laurent M H. 2014. Behavioural strategies towards human disturbances explain individual performance in woodland caribou. Oecologia, 176 (1): 297-306.
Li H F, Wang Y L, Chen W D, Li H Y, Tian Y, Chen R J. 2024. Evaluation of ecosystem services in Ruoergai National Park, China.Sustainability, 16 (8). DOI: 10. 3390/su16083241.
Liu M, Zhang Z C, Sun J, Wang Y, Wang J N, Tsunekawa A, Yibeltal M, Xu M, Chen Y J. 2020. One-year grazing exclusion remarkably restores degraded alpine meadow at Zoige, eastern Tibetan Plateau. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22 (2). DOI:10. 1016/j. gecco. 2020. e00951.
Liu Z S, Wang X M, Li Z G, Cui D Y, Li X Q. 2005. Comparison of seasonal feeding habitats by blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur) during winter and spring in Helan Mountain China. Zoological Research, 26 (6): 580-589. (in Chinese)
Llaneza L, López-Bao J V, Sazatornil V. 2012. Insights into wolf presence in human-dominated landscapes: the relative role of food availability, humans and landscape attributes. Diversity and Distributions, 18 (5): 459-469.
Malakoutikhah S, Fakheran S, Hemami M R, Tarkesh M, Senn J. 2020. Assessing future distribution, suitability of corridors and efficiency of protected areas to conserve vulnerable ungulates under climate change. Diversity and Distributions, 26 (10): 1383-1396.
Malcolm K, Cheveau M, St-Laurent M H. 2020. Wolf habitat selection in relation to recreational structures in a national park. Journal of Mammalogy, 101 (6): 1638-1649.
Mancinelli S, Falco M, Boitani L, Ciucci P. 2019. Social, behavioural and temporal components of wolf (Canis lupus) responses to anthropogenic landscape features in the central Apennines, Italy.Journal of Zoology, 309 (2): 114-124.
May R, Gorini L, van Dijk J, Brøseth H, Linnell J D C, Landa A. 2012. Habitat characteristics associated with wolverine den sites in Norwegian multiple-use landscapes. Journal of Zoology, 287(3): 195-204.
May R, Landa A, van Dijk J, Linnell J D C, Andersen R. 2006. Impact of infrastructure on habitat selection of wolverines Gulo gulo. Wildlife Biology, 12 (3): 285-295.
Mazerolle M, Linden D. 2019. Model selection and multimodel infer
ence based on (Q) AIC (c). R-CRAN. 233.
McLoughlin P D, Walton L R, Cluff H D, Paquet P C, Ramsay M A. 2004. Hierarchical habitat selection by tundra wolves. Journal of Mammalogy, 85 (3): 576-580.
Mokarram M, Roshan G, Negahban S. 2015. Landform classification using topography position index (case study: salt dome of KorsiaDarab plain, Iran). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1(4). DOI: 10. 1007/s40808-015-0055-9.
Mondal R, Bhat A. 2021. Comparison of regression-based and machine learning techniques to explain alpha diversity of fish communities in streams of central and eastern India. Ecological Indicators, 129. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ecolind. 2021. 107922.
Much R M, Breck S W, Lance N J, Callahan P. 2018. An ounce of prevention: Quantifying the effects of non-lethal tools on wolf behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 203 (6): 73-80.
Nelson A A, Kauffman M J, Middleton A D, Jimenez M D, McWhirter D E, Gerow K. 2016. Native prey distribution and migration mediates wolf (Canis lupus) predation on domestic livestock in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 94 (4): 291-299.
Raymond S, St-Clair C C. 2023. Urban coyotes select cryptic den sites near human development where conflict rates increase. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 87 (1).DOI: 10. 1002/jwmg. 22323.
Ripple W J, Estes J A, Beschta R L, Wilmers C C, Ritchie E G, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson M P, Schmitz O J, Smith D W, Wallach A D, Wirsing A J. 2014. Status and ecological effects of the World’s largest carnivores. Science, 343(6167): 151.
Roel M, Arild L, Jiska van D, John D C L, Roy A. 2006. Impact of infrastructure on habitat selection of wolverines Gulo gulo. Wildlife Biology, 12 (3): 285-295.
Roffler G H, Pilgrim K L, Zarn K E, Schwartz M K, Levi T. 2023.Variation in adult and pup wolf diets at natal den sites is influenced by forest composition and configuration. Ecology and Evolution, 13 (1). DOI: 10. 1002/ece3. 9648.
Santiago-Ávila F J, Agan S, Hinton J W, Treves A. 2022. Evaluating how management policies affect red wolf mortality and disappearance. Royal Society Open Science, 9 (5). DOI: 10. 1098/rsos. 120400.
Sazatornil V, Rodríguez A, Klaczek M, Ahmadi M, Álvares F, Arthur S, Blanco J C, Borg B L, Cluff D, Cortés Y, García E J, Geffen E, Habib B, Iliopoulos Y, Kaboli M, Krofel M, Llaneza L, Marucco F, Oakleaf J K, Person D K, Potocnik H, Razen N, Rio-Maior H, Sand H, Unger D, Wabakken P, López-Bao J V. 2016. The roleof human-related risk in breeding site selection by wolves. Biological Conservation, 201 (9): 103-110.
Shafapour Tehrany M, Kumar L, Neamah Jebur M, Shabani F. 2019.Evaluating the application of the statistical index method in flood susceptibility mapping and its comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10 (1): 79-101.
Stone S A, Breck S W, Timberlake J, Haswell P M, Najera F, Bean B S, Thornhill D J. 2017. Adaptive use of nonlethal strategies for minimizing wolf-sheep conflict in Idaho. Journal of Mammalogy, 98 (1): 33-44.
Stricker H K, Gehring T M, Donner D, Petroelje T. 2019. Mult-scale habitat selection model assessing potential gray wolf den habitat and dispersal corridors in Michigan, USA. Ecological Modelling, 397 (7): 84-94.
Tehrany M S, Kumar L, Jebur M N, Shabani F. 2019. Evaluating the application of the statistical index method in flood susceptibility mapping and its comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10 (1):79-101.
Theuerkauf J, Rouys S, Jedrzejewski W. 2003. Selection of den, rendezvous, and resting sites by wolves in the Bialowieza Forest, Poland. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81 (1): 163-167.
Tian T, Chen X, Pan H, Jin Y, Zhang X, Xiang Y, Song D, Yang B, Zhang L. 2023. Habitat selection differences of two sympatric large carnivores in the Southwestern Mountains of China. Diversity, 15 (9). DOI: 10. 3390/d15090968.
Trapp J R, Beier P, Mack C, Parsons D R, Paquet P C. 2008. Wolf, Canis lupus, den site selection in the Rocky Mountains. Canadian Field Naturalist, 122 (1): 49-56.
Uboni A, Smith D W, Mao J S, Stahler D R, Vucetich J A. 2015.Long- and short-term temporal variability in habitat selection of a top predator. Ecosphere, 6 (4). DOI: 10. 1890/ES14-00419. 1.
van Beeck Calkoen S T S, Kuijper D P J, Apollonio M, Blondel L, Dormann C F, Storch I, Heurich M. 2023. Numerical top-down effects on red deer (Cervus elaphus) are mainly shaped by humans rather than large carnivores across Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology, 60 (12): 2625-2635.
van den Bosch M, Kellner K F, Gantchoff M G, Patterson B R, BarberMeyer S M, Beyer D E, Erb J D, Isaac E J, MacFarland D M, Moore S A, Norton D C, Petroelje T R, Price Tack J L, Roell B J, Schrage M, Belant J L. 2023. Habitat selection of resident and non-resident gray wolves: implications for habitat connectivity.Scientific Reports, 13 (1). DOI: 10. 1038/s41598-023-47815-0.
White S, Briers R A, Bouyer Y, Odden J, Linnell J D C. 2015. Eurasian lynx natal den site and maternal home-range selection in multi-use landscapes of Norway. Journal of Zoology, 297 (2):87-98.
Xu L, Yu L, Bai J, Zhang T X, Cao Y Z, Ma C J, Zhou Z Q, Ran J H. 2024. Nest characteristics and nest site selection of tetraophasis obscurus in the Wanglang National Nature Reserve, Sichuan. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 43 (2): 134-142. (in Chinese)
Zhang H H, Dou H S, Zhai H C, Wu M R. 2006. Characteristics of dens in spring of three species of cands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(12): 3980-3988. (in Chinese)
Zhang H H, Li F, Gao Z X. 1999. Analysis of spatial patterns and habitat selection in wolf caves. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 19 (2):21-26. (in Chinese)
Zhang H T, Wang J H, Zhang Y C, Qian H Y, Xie Z Y, Hu Y F, Huang Y J, Zhao C, Cheng W L, Feng X X, Qi H R, Du S Q. 2023. Soil organic carbon dynamics and influencing factors in the zoige alpine wetland from the 1980s to 2020 based on a random forest model. Land, 12 (10): 1923.
Zhao Y, Tzedakis P C, Li Q, Qin F, Cui Q Y, Liang C, Birks H J B, Liu Y L, Zhang Z Y, Ge J Y, Zhao H, Felde V A, Deng C L, Cai M T, Li H, Ren W H, Wei H C, Yang H F, Zhang J W, Yu Z C, Guo Z T. 2020. Evolution of vegetation and climate variability on the Tibetan Plateau over the past 1. 74 million years. Science Advances, 6 (19). DOI: 101126/sciadv. aay6193.
方宇,张学霞,郭长庆.2020.若尔盖湿地黑颈鹤生境适宜性.生态学杂志,39(9):3021-3031.
刘振生,王小明,李志刚,崔多英,李新庆.2005.贺兰山岩羊冬春季取食生境的比较.动物学研究,26(6):580-589.
许路,余鳞,白俊,张塔星,曹亚珍,马朝娟,周智强,冉江洪.2024.四川王朗国家级自然保护区红喉雉鹑的巢特征和巢址选择.四川动物,43(2):134-142.
张洪海,李枫,高中信.1999.狼洞穴空间格局及生境选择的分析.兽类学报,19(2):21-26.
张洪海,窦华山,翟红昌,吴牧仁.2006.三种犬科动物春季洞穴特征.生态学报,26(12):3980-3988.
何雪李,陆施毅,黄中豪,李友邦.2021.广西扶绥白头叶猴对栖息地的选择与利用.生态学报,41(21):8664-8672.
杜聪聪,初雯雯,甄荣,端肖楠,陈刚,初红军.2017.新疆乌伦古河流域蒙新河狸巢穴特征和巢址生境选择.生态学报,37(15):5167-5178.
柴岫,金树仁.1963.若尔盖高原沼泽的类型及其发生与发展.地理学报,29(3):219-240.
文章导航

/

〈 〉