人与自然和谐共生是中国式现代化的本质要求，只有生态-经济-社会(EES)系统之间协调发展，才能建成符合人与自然协调发展的高质量野生动物栖息地。本研究以北京周边各区2009-2017年数据为依据，从EES系统角度选取指标并采用客观-AHP法(客观层次分析法)对各指标进行赋权后，根据变异系数协调发展模型得到各区野生动物栖息地EES系统之间的协调发展度，最后以怀柔区为例探究协调发展度对野生动物栖息地质量的实际影响。结果表明：(1)采用客观-AHP进行赋权，根据AIC值最小原则选择AIC值为505.707 6的SpeAHP判断矩阵，生态系统权重最大为0.460 9，社会系统权重为0.281 7，经济系统权重为0.257 4；(2)各区协调度较高，除由于生态系统得分增幅过大而引起的失调外，其余均处于协调状态，但发展度较低，属于低发展的协调；(3) EES系统协调发展度呈现随时间逐渐增大的态势，在6个区中，房山区、怀柔区、门头沟区EES系统协调发展度在2016年和2017年达到初级协调，其野生动物栖息地质量要高于其他各区；(4)栖息地内EES系统之间的协调度，对区域内人兽冲突的发生频率存在负向影响。
Harmonious coexistence between man and nature is the essential requirement of Chinese modernization, and only through the coordinated development of the ecological-economic-social (EES) systems can a high-quality wildlife habitat, conducive to the harmonious development between humans and nature, be built. Based on the data from various districts around Beijing from 2009 to 2017, we select indicators from the EES system perspective and adopts the objec tive-AHP method (Objective Analytic Hierarchy Process) to assign weights to each indicator. Based on the coefficient of variation coordination development model, we obtain the degree of coordinated development between the EES systems of wild animal habitats in each district. Finally, using Huairou District as an example, we explore the actual impact of the degree of coordinated development on the quality of wild animal habitats. The results show that using objective-AHP for weighting, the Spe-AHP judgment matrix with an AIC value of 505.707 6 is selected based on the principle of mini mum AIC value. The maximum weight of the ecological system is 0.460 9, the weight of the social system is 0.281 7, and the weight of the economic system is 0.257 4. The coordination degree of each district is relatively high, except for the imbalance caused by the significant increase in the ecological system score, the others are in a coordinated state, but with low development, belonging to low development coordination. The degree of coordinated development of EES sys tems shows a gradual increase over time. Among the six districts, Fangshan, Huairou, and Mentougou reached primary coordination in 2016 and 2017, with the quality of wild animal habitats being higher than in other districts. The coordina tion between EES systems within habitats has a negative impact on the frequency of human-wildlife conflicts in the re gion.
An B W, Hou Z M. 2021. Research on the construction method of ob jective AHP judgment matrix. Quantitative Economy Technical Economy Research, 38 (12):164-182. (in Chinese)
Chen L D, Liu X H, Fu B J. 1999. Evaluation on giant panda habitat fragmentation in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 3:3-9. (in Chinese)
Dai X A. 2010. The research on economic value of regulation of eco system of Changsha Wetlands. Ph. D thesis. Changsha:Central South University of Forestry and Technology. (in Chinese)
Dang J J. 2014. Study on coordinate development evaluation of ecological-economy-society in the loess hill region. Ph. D thesis. Yangling:Northwest A&F University. (in Chinese)
Han Z. 2020. The impact of Xiong'an New Area on the evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of landuse in Beijing. Ph. D thesis. Beijing:China University of Geosciences. (in Chinese)
Huang S L, He Y X, Yang Z, Ju P J, Yang X C, Wang K L, Feng Y,Chen H, Wu N. 2022. Construction of an ecosystem service value evaluation system for the Longquan Mountain urban forest park in Chengdu City based on the analytic hierarchy process. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 28 (6):1635-1645. (in Chinese)
Jacques O, Prosser R S. 2021. A probabilistic risk assessment of mi croplastics in soil ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 757:143987.
Li Z R, Tang G L, Chen L T. 2023. Establishment and application of the evaluation system for wildlife habitat restoration in Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 44 (2):409-417. (in Chinese)
Liu H B. 2016. Marine ecosystem in Guangdong Province based on EES collaborative model safety evaluation. Marine Economy, 6(4):20-27. (in Chinese)
Liu T. 2011. Study on coordinated development pattern of county economy and society in Shandong Province and the countermea sure. China Population·Resources and Environment, 21 (11):169-174. (in Chinese)
Lv H X, Xia S X, Gu J J, Su C H, Wang C X, Cui P. 2023. Habitat suitability assessment of large mammals and rare birds in Xianju County based on MaxEnt modeling. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 42 (11):2797-2805. (in Chinese)
Ma J Z, Zhou H F, Zheng G G, 2003. The status and development trend of wildlife and habitat conservation in China. Review of China Agricultural Science and Technology, 5 (4):3-6. (in Chinese)
Ma S J, Wang R S. 1984. The social-economic-natural complex eco system. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 4 (1):1-9. (in Chinese)
Rong L L, Peng L X, Tang H M, Deng C J. 2022. Review on ecosys tem service function and evaluation index of forest parks in Guangzhou. Value Engineering, 41 (36):163-165. (in Chinese)
Saaty T L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process:Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Saaty T L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical struc tures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15 (3):234-281.
Sun L, Zhang J L, He N J, Peng A L, Tang L B. 2022. Evaluation on giant panda habitat suitability with Foping National Nature Re serve. Shaanxi Forestry Science and Technology, 50 (2):37-43.(in Chinese)
Zhang T Z, Jiang F, Zhang J J, Cai Z Y, Gao H M, Gu H F, Song P F. 2023. A review of wildlife conservation and management strate gies of Sanjiangyuan National Park. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 43(2):193-205. (in Chinese)
Zhang Y, Du C L, Su Y. 2022. International experience of adaptive management of wildlife habitat conservation and its enlighten ments to the national park construction in China. Chinese Land scape Architecture, 38 (9):63-68. (in Chinese)
马小雯, 郭精军. 2023. 黄河流域生态安全评价及障碍因素研究.统计与决策, 39 (8):63-68.
马建章, 邹红菲, 郑国光. 2003. 中国野生动物与栖息地保护现状及发展趋势. 中国农业科技导报, 5 (4):3-6.
马世骏, 王如松. 1984. 社会-经济-自然复合生态系统. 生态学报, 4 (1):1-9.
包宗芳. 2022. 浅析野生动物保护现状与自然保护区管理策略. 农家参谋, (22):121-123.
吕环鑫, 夏少霞, 顾婧婧, 苏常红, 王春晓, 崔鹏. 2023. 基于 MaxEnt模型的仙居县大型兽类和珍稀鸟类栖息地适宜性评价. 生态学杂志, 42 (11):2797-2805.
刘汉斌. 2016. 基于 EES 协同模型的广东省海洋生态系统安全评价. 海洋经济, 6 (4):20-27.
刘涛. 2011. 山东县域社会经济协调发展格局及对策研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 21 (11):169-174.
安博文, 侯震梅. 2021. 客观 AHP 判断矩阵的构造方法研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, 38 (12):164-182.
孙亮, 张加龙, 何念军, 彭阿柳, 唐流斌. 2022. 陕西佛坪国家级自然保护区大熊猫栖息地适宜性评价. 陕西林业科技, 50 (2):37-43.
李梓榕, 唐国良, 陈丽婷. 2023. 上海市野生动物栖息地修复成效评价体系建立及应用. 野生动物学报, 44 (2):409-417.
邹颖. 2017. 区域协调发展评价指标体系及测度方法研究. 商讯, 27:113-114, 138.
张引, 杜春兰, 苏杨. 2022. 野生动物栖息地适应性管理的国际经验及对中国国家公园的启示. 中国园林, 38 (9):63-68.
张同作, 江峰, 张婧捷, 蔡振媛, 高红梅, 顾海峰, 宋鹏飞. 2023. 三江源国家公园野生动物保护与管理对策. 兽类学报, 43 (2):193-205.
陈利顶, 刘雪华, 傅伯杰. 1999. 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫生境破碎化研究. 生态学报, 3:3-9.
荣亮亮, 彭莉霞, 唐晗梅, 邓承军. 2022. 广州市森林公园生态系统服务功能及其评价指标研究综述. 价值工程, 41 (36):163-165.
党晶晶. 2014. 黄土丘陵区生态修复的生态-经济-社会协调发展评价研究. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学博士学位论文.
黄硕磊, 何奕忻, 杨早, 鞠佩君, 阳小成, 王凯伦, 冯毅, 陈槐, 吴宁. 2022. 成都市龙泉山城市森林公园生态系统服务价值评估体系的构建:基于层次分析法. 应用与环境生物学报, 28 (6):1635-1645.
阎济华. 2015. 中国野生动物栖息地破碎化严重. 生态经济, 31(10):10-13.
韩赜. 2020. 雄安新区建设对北京市土地利用时空格局演变的影响. 北京:中国地质大学 (北京) 博士学位论文.
燕芳敏, 王淑娜. 2023. 刍议习近平人与自然和谐共生理念. 江南论坛, 399 (4):18-22.
戴兴安. 2010. 长沙市湿地生态服务功能评估研究. 长沙:中南林业科技大学博士学位论文.
青公网安备 63010402000199号 青ICP备05000010号-2
