东北虎豹国家公园虎豹及其有蹄类猎物对人类干扰的时空响应

李梓琛; 周雨瞳; 曹冉星; 贾康宁; 麦晓烔; 冯佳伟; 王天明

doi:10.16829/j.slxb.150992

兽类学报 >

2024 , Vol. 44 >Issue 6: 665 - 680

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16829/j.slxb.150992

研究论文

东北虎豹国家公园虎豹及其有蹄类猎物对人类干扰的时空响应

李梓琛 ,
周雨瞳 ,
曹冉星 ,
贾康宁 ,
麦晓烔 ,
冯佳伟 ,
王天明

展开

1 东北虎豹国家公园保护生态学国家林草局重点实验室, 北京 100875;
2 生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室, 北京 100875;
3 北京师范大学生命科学学院, 北京 100875

李梓琛(2002-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事动物生态学研究.

收稿日期: 2024-08-09

修回日期: 2024-10-16

网络出版日期: 2024-12-02

基金资助

科技基础资源调查专项(2019FY101700,2021FY100700)

收起

Amur tiger and leopard and their ungulate prey show differentiated spatiotemporal responses to human disturbances in the Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park

LI Zichen ,
ZHOU Yutong ,
CAO Ranxing ,
JIA Kangning ,
MAI Xiaotong ,
FENG Jiawei ,
WANG Tianming

Expand

1 NFGA Key Laboratory for Conservation Ecology of Northeast Tiger and Leopard, Beijing 100875, China;
2 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Engineering, Beijing 100875, China;
3 College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2024-08-09

Revised date: 2024-10-16

Online published: 2024-12-02

Fold

摘要

人类作为超级捕食者所产生的直接捕杀或间接恐惧效应，会引起野生动物时间或空间上的行为响应。在人和野生动物共存景观中，探究捕食者和猎物响应人类干扰的时空策略对生物多样性保护至关重要。本研究于2018年1—12月，在东北虎豹国家公园利用红外相机陷阱技术获取107个位点、23 831个相机工作日的5种大型野生动物和人类9 409次活动数据，采用广义线性混合效应模型、核密度估计和多元逻辑回归混合效应模型等方法，评价不同强度的人类活动(人、车辆和家畜)对我国东北温带森林野生动物行为的影响，及其捕食者和猎物的时空相互作用。结果显示人类干扰事件占所有独立事件的49%(在高干扰点占66%，低干扰点占5%)。空间上，在高干扰森林，虎东北亚种(Panthera tigris altaica)的活动显著增加，而豹东北亚种(P.pardus orientalis)、狍(Capreolus pygargus)和野猪(Sus scrofa)呈相反趋势，梅花鹿(Cervus nippon)不受人类干扰的影响。时间上，核密度估计结果显示干扰导致大型食肉目动物类群和梅花鹿的日活动节律显著改变，多元逻辑回归混合效应模型结果发现干扰导致大型食肉目动物(特别是虎)的夜行性显著增加，狍和野猪白天的活动增加；更高的人类干扰明显降低顶级捕食者虎和豹与其有蹄类猎物的时间生态位重叠，尤其是梅花鹿、野猪与虎、豹之间的时间重叠。本研究为东北虎豹国家公园濒危物种保护提供了新见解，强调了使用红外相机直接监测人类活动，并量化人类活动对物种生存影响的重要性。受威胁的大型食肉目动物与其主要猎物对人类干扰的不同行为响应结果强调了动物在干扰环境中生存的时空行为可塑性，有助于预测物种如何根据其当前的时空行为策略对未来的环境变化做出响应。

关键词： 红外相机; 活动节律; 人-野生动物共存; 捕食者-猎物相互作用; 人类干扰

本文引用格式

李梓琛 , 周雨瞳 , 曹冉星 , 贾康宁 , 麦晓烔 , 冯佳伟 , 王天明 . 东北虎豹国家公园虎豹及其有蹄类猎物对人类干扰的时空响应[J]. 兽类学报, 2024 , 44(6) : 665 -680 . DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150992

Abstract

Human disturbances may disrupt carnivores coexistence in work landscapes, potentially triggering cascading influences in ecological communities. Responses in spatial and temporal behaviors to human activities can highlight species’survival strategies to maximize fitness. This study aims to quantify how human influences (e. g., peoples, vehicles, domestic dogs and livestock) may reshape Northeast China wildlife behaviour and their consequences for temporal interactions of predate-prey. We used a large dataset of 9 409 independent animals (tiger Panthera tigris, leopard P. pardus and their major ungulate prey) and human records from 23 831 camera nights at 107 camera trap sites in the Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park, from which we assessed the role of human in structuring community, guildand species-level diel activity. We assessed the effects of human disturbances on wildlife behavior and compared temporal overlap among tigers, leopards and their ungulate prey, at sites of high and low disturbance, as determined by the human relative abundance index. Human detections corresponded to 66% of all detections at high-disturbance sites and 5% of all detections at low-disturbance sites. Tigers, leopards, and their main ungulate prey use different spatial and temporal strategies in response to human disturbances. At sites of high disturbance, nocturnal and crepuscular tigers significantly increased their activity, but significantly decreased overlap with the human’s temporal niche to release from interference competition. For all species and large carnivores, there is a significant net effect of disturbance increasing nocturnality. There is also high variation among species; specifically, disturbances drive significant shifts away from diurnality for tigers, while roe deer Capreolus pygargus, and wild boars Sus scrofa become more diurnal. Compared to less disturbed forests, temporal overlap of top-predators and prey decreases in higher disturbed forests, notably among sika deer, wild boar and top-predators. This study provides insights into the responses of threatened large carnivores (tiger and leopard) to humans in a newly established national park. These differences in response to human disturbances among large carnivores and major prey highlighted the variation in temporal behaviors animals can use to exist in anthropogenic environments. Our findings can help in predicting how a species will respond to future change based on their current temporal behavior.

Key words： Camera trapping; Activity pattern; Human-wildlife coexistence; Predator-prey interactions; Human disturbance

参考文献

Angilletta M J.2009.Thermal Adaptation:A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Bender A, Groll A, Scheipl F.2018.A generalized additive model approach to time-to-event analysis.Statistical Modelling, 18:299-321.
Bennie J J, Duffy J P, Inger R, Gaston K J.2014.Biogeography oftime partitioning in mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111:13727-13732.
Berger J.2007.Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey andpredators in protected areas.Biology Letters, 3:620-623.
Bonnot N, Couriot O, Berger A, Cagnacci F, Ciuti S, De Groeve J, Gehr B, Heurich M, Kjellander P, Kröschel M, Morellet N, Sönnichsen L, Hewison A J M.2020.Fear of the dark? Contrasting impacts of humans versus lynx on diel activity of roe deeracross Europe.Journal of Animal Ecology, 89:132-145.
Burton A C, Beirne C, Gayno K M, Sun C, Granados A, Allen M L, Alston J M, Alvarenga G C, Calderón F S A, Amir Z, et al.2024.Mammal responses to global changes in human activity vary by trophic group and landscape.Nature Ecology&Evolution, 8:924-935.
Brooks M E, Kristensen K, van Benthem K J, Magnusson A, Berg C W, Nielsen A, Skaug H J, Mächler M, Bolker B M.2017.glm mTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zeroinflated generalized linear mixed modeling.The R Journal, 9:378-400.
Carothers J H, Jaksic F M.1984.Time as a niche difference-the role of interference competition.Oikos, 42:403-406.
Carter N, Jasny M, Gurung B, Liu J.2015.Impacts of people and ti gers on leopard spatiotemporal activity patterns in a global biodi versity hotspot.Global Ecology and Conservation, 3:149-162.
Carter N H, Shrestha B K, Karki J B, Pradhan N M B, Liu J G.2012.
Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109:15360-15365.
Cox D T C, Gardner A S, Gaston K J.2022.Global and regional erosion of mammalian functional diversity across the diel cycle.Science Advances, 8.DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abn6008.
Estes J A, Terborgh J, Brashares J S, Power M E, Berger J, Bond W J, Carpenter S R, Essington T E, Holt R D, Jackson J B, et al.2011.Trophic downgrading of planet Earth.Science, 333:301-306.
Feng J W, Sun Y F, Li H L, Xiao Y Q, Zhang D D, Smith J L D, Ge J P, Wang T M.2021.Assessing mammal species richness and occu pancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle.Di versity and Distributions, 27:857-872.
Ferry N.2014.Ctrecurrent:Convert Camera Trap Data Structure Into Recurrent Event Format.https://adibender.github.io/ctrecurrent/.
Ferry N, Dupont P, Bender A, Heurich M.2024.Introducing recurrent event analyses to assess species interactions based on camera-trap data:a comparison with time-to-first-event approaches.Meth ods in Ecology and Evolution, 15:1233-1246.
Frey S, Volpe J P, Heim N A, Paczkowski J, Fisher J T.2020.Move to nocturnality not a universal trend in carnivore species on dis turbed landscapes.Oikos, 129:1128-1140.
Frid A, Dill L.2002.Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk.Conservation Ecology, 6:11.
Gámez S, Harris N C.2021.Living in the concrete jungle:carnivore spatial ecology in urban parks.Ecological Applications, 31.DOI:10.1002/eap.2393.
Gaynor K M, Hojnowski C E, Carter N H, Brashares J S.2018.The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality.Science, 360:1232-1235.
Harris N C, Mills K L, Harissou Y, Hema E M, Gnoumou I T, Van Zo eren J, Abdel-Nasser Y I, Doamba B.2019.First camera survey in Burkina Faso and Niger reveals human pressures on mammal communities within the largest protected area complex in West Af rica.Conservation Letters, 12.DOI:10.1111/conl.12667.
Hill J E, DeVault T L, Belant J L.2019.Cause-specific mortality of the world’s terrestrial vertebrates.Global Ecology and Biogeog raphy, 28:680-689.
Kautz T M, Fowler N L, Petroelje T R, Beyer D E, Duquette J F, Bel ant J L.2022.White-tailed deer exploit temporal refuge from multi-predator and human risks on roads.Ecology and Evolu tion, 12.DOI:10.1002/ece3.9.125.
Kerley L L, Mukhacheva A S, Matyukhina D S, Salmanova E, Salkina G P, Miquelle D G.2015.A comparison of food habits and prey preference of Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) at three sites in the Russian Far East.Integrative Zoology, 10:354-364.
Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T.2003.Partitioning of time as an ecologi cal resource.Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systemat ics, 34:153-181.
Lawson R R, Fogarty D T, Loss S R.2019.Use of visual and olfac tory sensory cues by an apex predator in deciduous forests.Cana dian Journal of Zoology, 97:488-494.
Lendrum P E, Northrup J M, Anderson C R, Liston G E, Aldridge C L, Crooks K R, Wittemyer G.2018.Predation risk across a dy namic landscape:effects of anthropogenic land use, natural land scape features, and prey distribution.Landscape Ecology, 33:157-170.
Li Z L, Wang T M, Smith J L D, Feng R N, Feng L M, Mou P, Ge J P.2019.Coexistence of two sympatric flagship carnivores in the human-dominated forest landscapes of Northeast Asia.Land scape Ecology, 34:291-305.
Ngoprasert D, Lynam A J, Gale G A.2007.Human disturbance af fects habitat use and behaviour of Asiatic leopard Panthera par dus in Kaeng Krachan National Park, Thailand.Oryx, 41:343-351.
Nickel B A, Suraci J P, Allen M L, Wilmers C C.2020.Human pres ence and human footprint have non-equivalent effects on wildlife spatiotemporal habitat use.Biological Conservation, 241.DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108383.
O’Brien T G, Kinnaird M F, Wibisono H T.2003.Crouching tigers, hidden prey:Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical for est landscape.Animal Conservation, 6:131-139.
Ridout M S, Linkie M.2009.Estimating overlap of daily activity pat terns from camera trap data.Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 14:322-337.
Ripple W J, Estes J A, Beschta R L, Wilmers C C, Ritchie E G, Hebble white M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson M P, Schmitz O J, Smith D W, Wallach A D, Wirsing A J.2014.Status and eco logical effects of the world’s largest carnivores.Science, 343.DOI:10.1126/science.1241484.
Rowcliffe J M.2016.Activity:Animal Activity Statistics.https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=activity.
Rowcliffe J M, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Carbone C, Jansen P A.2014.Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data.Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5:1170-1179.
Sih A.2005.Predator-prey space use as an emergent outcome a be havioral response race.In:Barbosa P, Castellanos I eds.Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions.NewYork:Oxford University Press, 240-255.
Sills E O, Kramer R A.2023.Tiger protection brings carbon benefits.Nature Ecology&Evolution, 7:969-970.
Smith J A, Donadio E, Bidder O R, Pauli J N, Sheriff M J, Perrig P L, Middleton A D.2020.Where and when to hunt?Decomposing predation success of an ambush carnivore.Ecology, 101.DOI:10.1002/ecy.3172.
Smith J A, Donadio E, Pauli J N, Sheriff M J, Middleton A D.2019.Integrating temporal refugia into landscapes of fear:prey exploit predator downtimes to forage in risky places.Oecologia, 189:883-890.
Stankowich T.2008.Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance:A review and meta-analysis.Biological Conservation, 141:2159-2173.
Sugimoto T, Aramilev V V, Nagata J, McCullough D R.2016.Winter food habits of sympatric carnivores, Amur tigers and Far Eastern leopards, in the Russian Far East.Mammalian Biology, 81:214-218.
Suraci J P, Gaynor K M, Allen M L, Alexander P, Brashares J S, Cendejas-Zarelli S, Crooks K, Elbroch L M, Forrester T, Green A M, et al.2021.Disturbance type and species life history predict mammal responses to humans.Global Change Biology, 27:3718-
3731.
Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nunez P, Rao M, Shahabuddin G, Orihuela G, Riveros M, Ascanio R, Adler G H, Lambert T D, Balbas L.2001.Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments.Science, 294:1923-1926.
Tucker M A, Böhning-Gaese K, Fagan W F, Fryxell J M, Van Moorter B, Alberts S C, Ali A H, Allen A M, Attias N, Avgar T, et al.2018.Moving in the Anthropocene:global reductions in terres trial mammalian movements.Science, 359:466-469.
Van Scoyoc A, Smith J A, Gaynor K M, Barker K, Brashares J S.2023.The influence of human activity on predator-prey spatio temporal overlap.Journal of Animal Ecology, 92:1124-1134.
Venter O, Sanderson E W, Magrach A, Allan J R, Beher J, Jones K R, Possingham H P, Laurance W F, Wood P, Fekete B M, Levy M A, Watson J E M.2016.Sixteen years of change in the global terres trial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conserva tion.Nature Communications, 7.DOI:10.1038/ncomms12558.
Wang L, Feng J W, Mou P, Wang T M.2023.Relative abundance of roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) related to overstory structure and understory food resources in Northeast China.Global Ecology and Conservation, 46.DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02542.
Wang L, Feng J W, Tseveen A, Yang L M, Huang C M, Li D, Zhu X M, Feng L M, Wang T M, Ge J P, Mou P.2019.Forest cattle grazing affects understory food resource of ungulates in the east ern part of the Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park.Acta Theriologica Sinica, 39(4):386-396.(in Chinese)
Wang T M, Feng L M, Mou P, Wu J G, Smith J L D, Xiao W H, Yang H T, Dou H L, Zhao X D, Cheng Y C, Zhou B, Wu H Y, Zhang L, Tian Y, Guo Q X, Kou X J, Han X M, Miquelle D G, Oliver C D, Xu R M, Ge J P.2016.Amur tigers and leopards returning to China:direct evidence and a landscape conservation plan.Land scape Ecology, 31:491-503.
Wang T M, Feng L M, Yang H T, Bao L, Wang H F, Ge J P.2020.An introduction to Long-term Tiger-Leopard Observation Network based on camera traps in Northeast China.Biodiversity Science, 28(9):1059-1066.(in Chinese)
Wang T M, Feng L M, Yang H T, Han B Y, Zhao Y H, Juan L, Lu X Y, Zou L, Li T, Xiao W H, Mou P, Smith J L D, Ge J P.2017.A science-based approach to guide Amur leopard recovery in China.Biological Conservation, 210:47-55.
Wang T M, Royle J A, Smith J L D, Zou L, Lu X Y, Li T, Yang H T, Li Z L, Feng R N, Bian Y J, Feng L M, Ge J P.2018.Living on the edge:opportunities for Amur tiger recovery in China.Biological Conservation, 217:269-279.
Wilson M W, Ridlon A D, Gaynor K M, Gaines S D, Stier A C, Halp ern B S.2020.Ecological impacts of human-induced animal be haviour change.Ecology Letters, 23:1522-1536.
Wolf C, Ripple W J.2017.Range contractions of the world’s large carnivores.Royal Society Open Science, 4.DOI:10.1098/rsos.170052.
Xiao W H, Hebblewhite M, Robinson H, Feng L M, Zhou B, Mou P, Wang T M, Ge J P.2018.Relationships between humans and un gulate prey shape Amur tiger occurrence in a core protected area along the Sino-Russian border.Ecology and Evolution, 8:11677-11693.
Yang H T, Dou H L, Baniya R K, Han S Y, Guan Y, Xie B, Zhao G J, Wang T M, Mou P, Feng L M, Ge J P.2018.Seasonal food habits and prey selection of Amur tigers and Amur leopards in Northeast China.Scientific Report, 8.DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25275-1.
Zhu Y X, Wang D W, Li Z L, Feng J W, Wan T M.2022.Restoring ti ger population in Asia:Challenges, opportunities, and future pros pects.Biodiversity Science, 30(9).DOI:10.17520/biod.2022421.(in Chinese)
王天明, 冯利民, 杨海涛, 鲍蕾, 王红芳, 葛剑平.2020.东北虎豹生物多样性红外相机监测平台概述.生物多样性, 28(9):1059-1066.
王乐, 冯佳伟, Tseveen A, 杨丽萌, 黄春明, 李栋, 朱新亮, 冯利民, 王天明, 葛剑平, 牟溥.2019.森林放牧对东北虎豹国家公园东部有蹄类动物灌草层食物资源的影响.兽类学报, 39(4):386-396.
朱逸晓, 王大伟, 李治霖, 冯佳伟, 王天明.2022.亚洲虎种群恢复的机遇与挑战.生物多样性, 30(9).DOI:10.17520/biods.22421.
麦晓烔, 康佳, 李梓琛, 王天明.2024.东北虎豹国家公园梅花鹿活动节律及其对道路的响应.生物多样性.DOI:10.17520/biods.2024178.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献