研究论文

大熊猫进入自然环境后适应性研究

  • 余翔 ,
  • 毕温磊 ,
  • 侯蓉 ,
  • 刘家斌 ,
  • 李祖胜 ,
  • 付明霞 ,
  • 吴蔚 ,
  • 马锐 ,
  • 陈超 ,
  • 莫利 ,
  • 宋心强 ,
  • 王伟 ,
  • 杨洪 ,
  • 张倩 ,
  • 齐敦武
展开
  • 1 成都大熊猫繁育研究基地, 珍稀濒危野生动物保护四川省重点实验室, 成都 610081;
    2 荥经县大相岭自然保护区管护中心, 雅安 625200;
    3 四川林业和草原局, 成都 610081
余翔(1992-),男,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事动物生态学研究.E-mail:yuxiang9212@163.com

收稿日期: 2024-08-28

  录用日期: 2025-02-13

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(U21A20193,32570615,32400405);成都大熊猫繁育研究基地(2024CPB-B06,CAZG2025A25,2024CPBA23,2024CPB-Y05,CAZG2025C13);四川省科技计划资助(2024NSFSC0032,2025ZNSFSC0278);成都市科技计划资助(2023-YF09-00017-SN)

Research on the adaptation of reintroduced giant pandas to the natural environment

  • YU Xiang ,
  • BI Wenlei ,
  • HOU Rong ,
  • LIU Jiabin ,
  • LI Zusheng ,
  • FU Mingxia ,
  • WU Wei ,
  • MA Rui ,
  • CHEN Chao ,
  • MO Li ,
  • SONG Xinqiang ,
  • WANG Wei ,
  • YANG Hong ,
  • ZHANG Qian ,
  • QI Dunwu
Expand
  • (1 Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, The Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610081, China;
    2 Daxiangling Nature Reserve Management and Protection Center of Yingjing County, Ya'an 625200, China;
    3 Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Chengdu 610081, China

Received date: 2024-08-28

  Accepted date: 2025-02-13

  Online published: 2025-09-26

摘要

野化放归是维持濒危野生动物种群长期续存的重要手段,而对于圈养动物放归自然来说,如何较快地适应复杂的野外环境,是能够成功放归的重要保障。因此,深入研究动物放归后的栖息地偏好、活动模式及环境因子利用等特征,有助于掌握其环境适应的过程。本研究对大熊猫 (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) 进入自然环境后 6 个月内的栖息地偏好,12 个月内的家域、日移动距离和环境因子利用等特征进行了分析,以了解其野外适应过程。研究发现大熊猫个体很好地适应了野外环境,家域稳定后其栖息地偏好与野生大熊猫相似,偏好栖息地重合比例最高达 66%;第 12 个月活动家域面积为 4.5 km2;平均日移动距离为 (293.2 ± 420.2) m;月平均利用海拔为 (2 721.3 ± 66.9) m;活动区域平均坡度中位数小于 20.0°;主要活动于阳坡及半阳坡区域。大熊猫适应过程分为探索期 (1 ~ 31 d)、初始稳定期 (32 ~ 61 d)、游荡期 (62 ~ 91 d) 和稳定期 (92 d 以后) 4 个阶段。本研究还发现对于放归成年雌性圈养个体,延长野化训练周期,可能会在一定程度上让其在较短的时间内进入稳定期,从而提升放归成功率。本研究结果可为进一步优化圈养大熊猫野化培训和监测等方案提供依据。

本文引用格式

余翔 , 毕温磊 , 侯蓉 , 刘家斌 , 李祖胜 , 付明霞 , 吴蔚 , 马锐 , 陈超 , 莫利 , 宋心强 , 王伟 , 杨洪 , 张倩 , 齐敦武 . 大熊猫进入自然环境后适应性研究[J]. 兽类学报, 2025 , 45(5) : 707 -716 . DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.151007

Abstract

Animal rewilding is an important means to maintain the long-term survival of endangered wildlife populations. For captive animals, how to quickly adapt to the complex wild environment is an important guarantee for successful survival. Therefore, knowing habitat preference, activity patterns, and utilization of environmental factors is helpful to clarify the process of ecological adaptation of reintroduced animals. In this study, we focused on the preferred habitat within 6 months, home range size, daily movement distance, and use of environmental factors within 12 months of a reintroduced giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). After 6 months later, the reintroduced giant panda showed the similar habitat preference as wild giant pandas in the same area (the coincidence ratio up to 66%), with a utilization (2 721. 3 ± 66. 9) m altitude in the end of one year. Also, the reintroduced giant panda exhibited a 4. 5 km2 home range, moved (293. 2 ± 420. 2) m average distance daily, used a 20. 0° median average slope of the active area in sunny slope and semisunny slope areas. Based on the results, we divide the adaptation process in 4 stages: exploratory period (1 - 31 d), initial stable period (32 - 61 d), wandering period (62 - 91 d), and stable period (after 92 d), after which the reintroduced individual was well adapted to the wild environment. Our study indicates that releasing adult captive females and extending the rewilding training period may benefit reintroduced giant pandas to enter a stable stage in a relatively short period, thereby improving the success rate of reintroduction. The results of this study can provide a basis for further optimization of captive giant panda rewilding training and monitoring programs.

参考文献

Bai W K, Huang Q Y, Zhang J D, Stabach J, Huang J Y, Yang H B, Songer M, Connor T, Liu J G, Zhou S Q, Zhang H M, Zhou C Q, Hull V. 2020. Microhabitat selection by giant pandas[J]. Biological Conservation, 247:108615. DOI:10. 1016/j. biocon. 2020. 108615.
Chen Z J. 2016. The effectiveness of the reintroduction of giant pandas from the perspective of spatial distribution and genetic structure[D]. Master thesis. Nanchong:China West Normal University. (in Chinese)
Gu X D, Wang H J, Zhang X N, Dai Q, Zhu L F, Gu H J, Wang Y Z, Wei F W. 2011. Home range and activity rhythm of the reintroduced giant panda'ShenglinYihao'in Dujiangyan, Sichuan Province[J]. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 30 (4):493-496. (in Chinese)
Hu J C, Schaller J. 1985. Wolong's Giant Panda[M]. Chengdu:Sichuan Publishing House of Science & Technology Press. (in Chinese)
Hou N, Dai Q, Ran J H, Jiao Y Y, Chen Y, Zhao C. 2014. A corridor design for the giant panda in the Niba Mountain of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 20 (6):1039-1045. (in Chinese)
Hong M S, Wei W, Zhou H, Tang J F, Han H, Zhang Z J. 2019. Creative conservation in China:releasing captive giant pandas into the wild[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(30):31548-31549.
Hull V, Zhang J D, Zhou S Q, Huang J Y, Li R G, Liu D, Xu W J, Huang Y, Ouyang Z Y, Zhang H M, Liu J G. 2015. Space use by endangered giant pandas[J]. Journal of Mammalogy, 96 (1):230-236.
Hull V, Zhang J D, Huang J Y, Zhou S Q, Viña A, Shortridge A, Li R G, Liu D, Xu W H, Ouyang Z Y, Zhang H M, Liu J G. 2016. Habitat use and selection by giant pandas[J]. PLoS ONE, 11 (9):e0162266. DOI:10. 1371/journal. pone. 0162266.
He L Y, Dai Q, Yang Z S, He K, Qing J, Huang F, Gu X D, Yang X Y, Huang Y, Li D S, Zhang H M, Zhou X. 2019. Assessing the health status of released, captive-bred giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) through activity patterns[J]. Folia Zoologica, 68(2):72-78.
He L Y. 2019. Study on the activity pattern of giant panda after released into Xiaoxiangling Mountains[D]. Master thesis. Nanchong:China West Normal University. (in Chinese)
Laver P N, Kelly M J. 2008. A critical review of home range studies[J]. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72 (1):290-298.
Liu Z S, Gao H, Teng L W, Su Y, Wang X Q. 2013. Habitat suitability assessment of blue sheep in Helan Mountain based on MAXENT modeling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33 (22):7243-7249. (in Chinese)
Lei M W, Yuan S B, Yang Z S, Hong M S, Yang X Y, Gu X, D Huang F, Zhang Z J. 2015. Comparison of microhabitats and foraging strategies between the captive-born Zhangxiang and wild giant pandas:implications for future reintroduction[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22:15089-15096.
Qi D W, Hu Y B, Gu X D, Li M, Wei F W. 2009. Ecological Niche modeling of the sympatric giant and red pandas on a mountain-range scale[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18:2127-2141.
Ran J H, Zeng Z Y, Liu S C, Wang H J. 2006. A survey of the giant panda population and habitats in the Daxiangling Mountains[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition), 43 (4):889-893. (in Chinese)
Ren J. 2019. Migration behaviors of reintroducted Pere David's deer(Elaphurus davidianus) in Dongting Lake District based on GPS technology[D]. Master thesis. Changsha:Central South University of Forestry & Technology. (in Chinese)
Wang J L, Wang H J. 2016. Research on suitable habitat distribution for Chrysolophus pictus based on the Maxent model[J]. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 42 (1-2):12-15. (in Chinese)
Wei F W, Feng Z J, Wang Z, Li M Y. 1999. Feeding strategy and resource partitioning between giant and red pandas[J]. Mammalia, 63:417-430.
Wei F W, Zhang Z J, Hu J C. 2011. Research advances and perspectives on the ecology of wild giant pandas[J]. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 31 (4):412-421. (in Chinese)
Wu D F, Lin S W L, He S S, Li D S, Liu X Q, Zhang G Q, Chen J D, Feng G Z, Tang H, Mu S J, Yan X, Huang Y, Zhao K, Duan Z G, Zou L K. 2023. Study on the movement of field-introduced giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) during estrus[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 41 (3):495-508. (in Chinese)
Yang Z S, Gu X D, Nie Y G, Huang F, Huang Y, Dai Q, Hu Y B, Yang Y, Zhou X, Zhang H M, Yang X Y, Wei F W. 2018. Reintroduction of the giant panda into the wild:a good start suggests a bright future[J]. Biological Conservation, 217:181-186.
Xu W H, Ouyang Z Y, Jiang Z Y, Zhen H, Liu J G. 2006. Assessment of giant panda habitat in the Daxiangling Mountain range, Sichuan, China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 14 (3):223-231. (in Chinese)
Ye X, Skidmore A, Toxopeus A. 2010. Characterizing the spatial distribution of giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in fragmented forest landscapes[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 37:865-878.
Yu X, Chen J C, Wang B, Yan Y, Ran J H, He F, Peng B. 2017. Population density estimation and habitat suitability assessment of Lophophorus lhuysii during breeding season in Xiaozhaizigou National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province[J]. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 36 (4):361-367. (in Chinese)
Yu X, Luo X H, Zhou Y S, Lan G W, Chen C, Hou R, Jiang Z Y, Hu D M, Qi D W, Zhang Z H. 2020. Analysis of giant panda habitat at the southern of Minshan Mountains[J]. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 39 (2):177-182. (in Chinese)
Zhang Z J, Zhang S N, Wei F W, Wang H J, Li M, Hu J C. 2006. Translocation and discussion on reintroduction of captive giant panda[J]. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 26 (3):292-299. (in Chinese)
Zhang J D, Hull V, Huang J Y, Zhou S Q, Xu W H, Yang H B, McConnell W J, Li R G, Liu D, Huang Y, Ouyang Z Y, Zhang H M, Liu J G. 2015. Activity patterns of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)[J]. Journal of Mammalogy, 96 (6):1116-1127.
Zhang J D, Hull V, Ouyang Z Y. 2013. A review of home range studies[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33 (11):3269-3279. (in Chinese)
Zhang J D, Huang J Y, Zhou S Q, Hull V, Zhang H M, Ouyang Z Y. 2019. Spatial utilization and activity pattern characteristics of a giant panda during the reproduction-rearing period[J]. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 39 (4):421-430. (in Chinese)
Zhou Y S, Hou R, Liu J B, Bi W L, Owens J R, Zhang Z H, Huang F, Luo W, Qi D W. 2021. Habitat utilization and spatial patterns of pre-released giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)[J]. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 41 (6):641-648. (in Chinese)
Zhu H M. 2019. The response of captive-bred giant pandas to the natural environment after release[D]. Master thesis. Nanchong:China West Normal University. (in Chinese)
Zhu H M, Yang B, He K, Qing J, Zhang Z J, Zhang K, Tang B, Yang Z S, Dai Q, Gu X D, Yang X Y, Huang Y, Li D S, Zhang H M. 2019. Habitat utilization and release-site fidelity of translocated captive-bred giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)[J]. Folia Zoologica, 68 (2):86-94.
王健龙, 王红娟. 2016. 基于 Maxent 模型的红腹锦鸡适宜生境分布研究[J]. 安徽林业科技, 42 (1-2):12-15.
古晓东, 王鸿加, 张陕宁, 戴强, 朱立峰, 顾海军, 王跃招, 魏辅文. 2011. 放归大熊猫'盛林 1 号'的活动范围和活动节律监测[J]. 四川动物, 30 (4):493-497.
冉江洪, 曾宗永, 刘世昌, 王鸿加. 2006. 四川大相岭大熊猫种群及栖息地调查[J]. 四川大学学报:自然科学版, 43 (4):889-893.
朱洪民. 2019. 人工繁育大熊猫放归后对自然环境的响应[D]. 南充:西华师范大学硕士学位论文.
任静. 2019. 基于 GPS 技术的洞庭湖区野外放归麋鹿种群迁移行为研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学硕士学位论文.
刘振生, 高惠, 滕丽微, 苏云, 王晓勤, 孔芳毅. 2013. 基于 MAXENT 模型的贺兰山岩羊生境适宜性评价[J]. 生态学报, 33 (22):7243-7249.
吴代福, 林邵雯澜, 何胜山, 李德生, 刘晓强, 张贵权, 陈加东, 冯高志, 唐华, 牟仕杰. 2023. 野外引种大熊猫 (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) 发情期移动模式研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 41 (3):495-508.
何流洋. 2019. 小相岭山系放归大熊猫活动模式研究[D]. 南充:西华师范大学硕士学位论文.
余翔, 陈俊橙, 王彬, 严勇, 冉江洪, 贺飞, 彭波. 2017. 四川小寨子沟国家级自然保护区绿尾虹雉种群密度调查与栖息地评价[J]. 四川动物, 36 (4):361-367.
余翔, 罗秀海, 周延山, 兰官伟, 陈超, 侯蓉, 蒋泽银, 胡大明, 齐敦武, 张志和. 2020. 岷山山系南端大熊猫栖息地分布分析[J]. 四川动物, 39 (2):177-182.
张泽钧, 张陕宁, 魏辅文, 王鸿加, 李明, 胡锦矗. 2006. 移地与圈养大熊猫野外放归的探讨[J]. 兽类学报, 26 (3):292-299.
张晋东, Hull V, 欧阳志云. 2013. 家域研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 33(11):3269-3279.
张晋东, 黄金燕, 周世强, Hull V, 张和民, 欧阳志云. 2019. 繁殖-育幼期雌性大熊猫的空间利用与活动模式特征[J]. 兽类学报, 39(4):421-430.
陈子君. 2016. 从空间分布和遗传结构角度评估大熊猫放归成效[D]. 南充:西华师范大学硕士学位论文.
国家林业和草原局. 2021. 全国第四次大熊猫调查报告[M]. 北京:科学出版社.
周延山, 侯蓉, 刘家斌, 毕温磊, Owens J R, 张志和, 黄蜂, 骆伟, 齐敦武. 2021. 野化培训大熊猫的生境利用和空间格局[J]. 兽类学报, 41 (6):641-648.
胡锦矗, 乔治·夏勒. 1985. 卧龙的大熊猫[M]. 成都:四川科学技术出版社.
侯宁, 戴强, 冉江洪, 焦迎迎, 程勇, 赵成. 2014. 大相岭山系泥巴山大熊猫生境廊道设计[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 20 (6):1039-1045.
徐卫华, 欧阳志云, 蒋泽银, 郑华, 刘建国. 2006. 大相岭山系大熊猫生境评价与保护对策研究[J]. 生物多样性, 14 (3):223-231.
魏辅文, 张泽钧, 胡锦矗. 2011. 野生大熊猫生态学研究进展与前瞻[J]. 兽类学报, 31 (4):412-421.
文章导航

/

〈 〉