The research on restoration priority assessment of damaged giant panda habitats based on multi-criteria decision analysis of AHP-OWA

doi:10.16829/j.slxb.150878

ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 395-410.DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150878

• ORIGINAL PAPERS • Next Articles

The research on restoration priority assessment of damaged giant panda habitats based on multi-criteria decision analysis of AHP-OWA

HE Hui^1,3, JIANG Min², XIE Wenwen², HUANG Yu², ZHANG Yueming², WU Sujuan², ZHANG Pan³, QI Cheng³, LUO Chuan⁴, LI Junlin⁵, LUO Peng², YANG Hao²

1 Yingjing County Daxiangling Nature Reserve Management and Protection Center, Ya'an 625201, China;
2 Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China;
3 Ya'an Management Bureau of Giant Panda National Park, Ya'an 610036, China;
4 Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Survey and Planning Institute, National Park Institute, Chengdu 610084, China;
5 Forestry Science and Technology Promotion Center in Shizhong District of Neijiang, Neijiang 641000, China

Received:2023-11-15 Revised:2024-03-12 Online:2024-07-30 Published:2024-08-03

基于多准则决策分析评价大熊猫受损栖息地恢复优先级

何珲^1,3, 蒋敏², 谢文文², 黄瑜², 张月明², 吴素娟², 张攀³, 齐程³, 罗川⁴, 李俊霖⁵, 罗鹏², 杨浩²

1 荥经县大相岭自然保护区管护中心, 雅安 625201;
2 中国科学院成都生物研究所, 中国科学院山地生态恢复与生物资源利用重点实验室, 生态恢复与生物多样性保育四川省重点实验室, 成都 610041;
3 大熊猫国家公园雅安管理分局, 雅安 610036;
4 四川省林业和草原调查规划院, 国家公园研究所, 成都 610084;
5 内江市市中区林业科技推广中心, 内江 641000

通讯作者: 杨浩，E-mail:yanghao@cib.ac.cn
作者简介:何珲(1988-），男，硕士，林业工程师，主要从事生态保护与修复等相关工作.E-mail:yaxmgyxxbs@163.com
基金资助:
四川省自然科学基金面上项目(24NSFSC0949)；环保部生物多样性调查项目大雪山-小相岭山系-凉山山系地区生物多样性相关传统知识调查与评估(2019HJ2096001006)

Abstract

Abstract: Identifying and prioritizing the restoration of impaired giant panda habitats is a crucial prerequisite for habitat restoration initiatives within the Giant Panda National Park. When park managers decide to undertake habitat restoration work, it becomes imperative to determine the priority areas. The study considers habitat protection and restoration difficulty comprehensively, to establish a multi-criteria decision analysis for evaluating the priority areas of habitat restoration. This method is based on the analytic hierarchy process and ordered weighted averaging (AHP-OWA), and the Yingjing area of the Giant Panda National Park was selected as a case study to assess the adaptability of the method within the National Park. The results indicate that the damaged or impaired habitat covers an area of 4 273. 97 hm², comprising nine types and accounting for 5. 11% of the total area of the Giant Panda National Park in Yingjing County. Notably,low-quality secondary forests, artificial pure forests and mine area constitute the largest types of damaged habitat. The AHP-OWA decision analysis method quantitatively reveals the trade-off in the‘protection-cost’relationship. This method offers a range of priority strategies for restoring damaged habitats under different decision-making scenarios. Ultimately, it provides crucial decision-making support for habitat protection and restoration efforts within the Giant Panda National Park. Irrespective of the various scenarios considered, the study identifies the low-quality secondary forests in the high-density distribution area of giant pandas in the northern region of the Toudao watershed along G108 highway as the habitat restoration areas with the highest priority. Given the diverse types of damaged giant panda habitat with varying vegetation and soil characteristics, future habitat restoration efforts should employ measures such as soil restoration, planting, thinning, or striped clear-cutting, tailored to the specific needs of each habitat type.

Key words: Giant Panda National Park, Damaged habitats, Habitat restoration, Restoration priority

摘要： 栖息地恢复是大熊猫国家公园建设的一项关键性工作，明确大熊猫受损栖息地恢复优先级是大熊猫国家公园实施栖息地修复的前提和基础。本研究综合考虑栖息地保护和恢复难易程度，采用层次分析-有序加权平均(AHP-OWA)的多准则决策分析法构建大熊猫受损栖息地恢复优先级评价方法，并以大熊猫国家公园荥经片区为研究区开展试验评价。结果表明：大熊猫国家公园荥经片区9种类型受损栖息地总面积4 273.97 hm²，占大熊猫国家公园荥经片区总面积的5.11%，其中连片人工纯林、低质次生天然林和矿山受损面积较大；AHP-OWA多准则决策分析法可以定量揭示“保护-成本”权衡关系，能够提供不同决策情境下的受损栖息地恢复优先级方案，为大熊猫国家公园栖息地保护与恢复提供了充足的决策支持；无论何种情景，国道108沿线头道水流域北侧大熊猫高密度分布区域的低质次生天然林是大熊猫国家公园荥经片区最优先恢复地段。考虑到多种受损类型，未来大熊猫国家公园栖息地恢复应因地制宜，根据植被和土壤特征情况，适当采取如整地、人工植苗、带状皆伐或疏伐等人工恢复措施促进栖息地恢复。

关键词: 大熊猫国家公园, 受损栖息地, 栖息地修复, 恢复优先级

CLC Number:

Q958.1

HE Hui, JIANG Min, XIE Wenwen, HUANG Yu, ZHANG Yueming, WU Sujuan, ZHANG Pan, QI Cheng, LUO Chuan, LI Junlin, LUO Peng, YANG Hao. The research on restoration priority assessment of damaged giant panda habitats based on multi-criteria decision analysis of AHP-OWA[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 44(4): 395-410.

何珲, 蒋敏, 谢文文, 黄瑜, 张月明, 吴素娟, 张攀, 齐程, 罗川, 李俊霖, 罗鹏, 杨浩. 基于多准则决策分析评价大熊猫受损栖息地恢复优先级[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(4): 395-410.

References

Bai W K, Zhang J D, Dong X, Li C, Gu X D, Zhou C Q. 2017. Dy namics of the space use patterns of giant pandas in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 37 (4):327-335. (in Chinese)
Chen H, Wang G, Wang C, Xue F, Cheng H, Zhang Y N. 2024. Activ ity rhythms, home range characteristics, and habitat selection of reintroduced red-crowned crane. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44 (4):1526-1538. (in Chinese)
Chen W, Zheng B C, Zhang J D, Xu L M, Hou J, Hull V. 2023. Giant panda face recognition based on PandaFaceNet. Ecological Infor matics, 77:102225.
Dong B N. 2018. Spatio-temporal variations of habitat selection by giant pandas and its habitat disturbance in Qionglai Mountains, China. Master thesis. Nanchong:China West Normal Univer sity. (in Chinese)
Etter A, Andrade A, Nelson C R, Cortés J, Saavedra K. 2020. Assess ing restoration priorities for high-risk ecosystems:an application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. Land Use Policy, 99:104874.
Fan F, Bu H L, McShea W J, Shen X L, Li S. 2023. Free-ranging live stock cause forest understory degradation in giant panda (Ailu ropoda melanoleuca) habitat. Forest Ecology and Management, 538 (6):120990.
Fu J R, Sun Z Y, Liu S Y, Fu Z H, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhao J, Cai G. 2008. A survey of bird resources in Daxiangling Nature Reserve in Sichuan Province. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, (3):31-37. (in Chinese)
Guan J H, Cao Y, Wu T Y, Dong L. 2017. An investigation of reveg etation in Shouyun Iron Mine Wasteland in Beijing. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 33 (11):13-18. (in Chinese)
Guo Z S. 2022. Temporal and spatial characteristics of vegetation re covery after earthquake in damaged giant panda habitat. Master thesis. Nanchong:China West Normal University. (in Chinese)
Hu J P, Yang X, Jiang X G, Ruan X D. 2022. A system of ecological impact assessment of wildlife and its habitat based on AHP. Jour nal of West China Forestry Science, 51 (3):24-31.
Hu R H, Zhang L M, He X A, He S S, Hu Y. 2023. Giant Panda Na tional Park, national treasure habitats connected into a large area.
Forest & Humankind, (1):36-49. (in Chinese)
Jia W. 2023. Giant panda microhabitat study in the Daxiangling Niba Mountain corridor, Sichuan Province. Master thesis. Guiyang:Guizhou Normal University. (in Chinese)
Jian Y D. 2017. A habitat selection of giant panda in Laoxiancheng Na tional Nature Reserve, Shaanxi Province. Master thesis. Xi'an:Northwest University. (in Chinese)
Jiang H, Eastman J R. 2000. Application of fuzzy measures in multicriteria evaluation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (2):173-184.
Jiang W C, Yang J Q, Peng E R, Wang H Y, Sun X N, Dong H W, Li R L. 2022. Research progress of mine ecological restoration. Min ing Research and Development, 42 (4):127-132. (in Chinese)
Laurian L. 2008. Designing greenways:Sustainable landscapes for na ture and people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74 (1):145.
Li B V, Pimm S L. 2016. China's endemic vertebrates sheltering un der the protective umbrella of the giant panda. Conservation Biol ogy, 30 (2):329-339.
Li C, Yu J J, Wu W, Hou R, Yang Z S, Owens J R, Gu X D, Xiang Z F, Qi D W. 2021. Evaluating the efficacy of zoning designations for national park management. Global Ecology and Conservation, 27:e01562.
Li C. 2019. Dynamics of the giant panda habitat suitability in re sponse to changing anthropogenic disturbance in the Liangshan Mountains, China. Master thesis. Nanchong:China West Normal University. (in Chinese)
Li F, Cheng C N, Yang R. 2022. A review of ecosystem restoration:progress and prospects of domestic and abroad. Biodiversity Sci ence, 30 (10):312-323. (in Chinese)
Li H, Ma Z C, Zhu Y J, Liu Y S, Yang X H. 2020b. Planning and pri oritizing forest landscape restoration within megacities using the ordered weighted averaging operator. Ecological Indicators, 116:106499.
Li H, Zhai Y P, Yang X L, Dong X T, Yang J, Ma Z C, Liu J Z. 2022.Simulating ecological security patterns in the Xiong'an New Area based on the multicriteria evaluation of AHP-OWA. Acta Eco logica Sinica, 42 (1):150-160. (in Chinese)
Li S J, Zhou X Y, Gao W L, Hu Y. 2022. Analysis of precipitation characteristics in Ya'an from 1991 to 2020. Plateau and Moun tain Meteorology Research, 42 (S2):8-13. (in Chinese)
Li S, Feng J, Li B B, Li S. 2021. The Giant Panda National Park:Ex periences and lessons learned from the pilot. Biodiversity Sci ence, 29 (3):307-311. (in Chinese)
Li S, Kang D W, Song G H, Li J Q. 2017. Comparative the habitat used by giant pandas and man-made forest. Journal of Biology, 34 (2):55-57. (in Chinese)
Li T, Luo P, Luo C, Yang H, Li Y J, Zuo D D, Xiong Q L, Mo L, Mu C X, Gu X D, Zhou S Q, Huang J Y, Li H L, Wu S J, Cao W Q, Zhang Y B, Wang M J, Li J L, Liu Y, Gou P J, Zhu Z F, Wang D Y, Liang Y, Bai S, Zou Y. 2020a. Long-term empirical monitor ing indicates the tolerance of the giant panda habitat to climate change under contemporary conservation policies. Ecological In dicators, 110:105886.
Li Y H, Rao T, Gai L, Price M L, Liu Y X, Ran J H. 2023. Giant pan das are losing their edge:population trend and distribution dy namic drivers of the giant panda. Global Change Biology, 1 (30):4480-4495.
Li Z, He S S, Luo Y, Zhou S Q, Sun M M, Qu Y Y, Zhou X P, Zhang H M. 2018. Habitat selection of giant pandas in wildness training program. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 39 (6):20-24, 39. (in Chinese)
Lin L, Wang W H, Ran M Y, Geng S H, Yang Y J. 2022. Discussion on giant panda habitat suitability and potential habitat in Wang lang Nature Reserve. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 50 (1):87-92. (in Chinese)
Liu J G, Ouyang Z Y, Taylor W W, Groop R, Tan Y C, Zhang H M. 1999. A framework for evaluating the effects of human factors on wildlife habitat:the case of giant pandas. Conservation Biology, 6(13):1360-1370.
Liu Y X, Peng J, Han Y N, Wei H, Du Y Y. 2014. Suitability assess ment for building land consolidation on gentle hillside based on OWA operator:a case in Dali Bai Nationality Borough in Yunnan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34 (12):3188-3197. (in Chinese)
Ma K P, Liu C R, Liu Y M. 1995. Measurement of biotic community diversity:Ⅱ β diversity. Biodiversity Science, 3 (1):38-43. (in Chinese)
Ma Y S, Ma Q Q, Sun L, Li S, Zhou G, Li T, Dong L L, Cao L H, Zhu D P. 2020. The seasonal spatial distribution and activity pattern of giant panda distribution in Foping National Nature Reserve based on camera-trapping data. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 55(1):20-28. (in Chinese)
Nan X N, Wang R X, Zhang X B. 2021. The status quo and conserva tion management planning of giant panda (Ailuropoda melano leuca) population and habitat in Qinling Mountains, Shaanxi Prov ince. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 42 (3):663-674. (in Chinese)
Ouyang Z Y, Li Z X, Liu J G, An L, Zhang H M, Tan Y C, Zhou S Q. 2002. The recovery processes of giant panda habitat in Wolong Nature Reserve, Sichuan China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, (11):1840-1849. (in Chinese)
Qi D W, Hu Y B, Gu X D, Yang X Y, Yang G, Wei F W. 2012. Quanti fying landscape linkages among giant panda subpopulations in re gional scale conservation. Integrative Zoology, 7 (2):165-174.
Qin W R, Pan H, Cheng Y, Song X Q, Fu M X, Liu J Y, Zhang Y B, Zhou C Q, Yang B. 2023. Relationship between tree layer and understory Bashania faberi of forest community in giant panda habitat. Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Sci ences), 44 (1):13-18. (in Chinese)
Raziyeh D Z, Sima F, Alireza S, Reza H M. 2016. Identifying re quired criteria for prioritization of ecological restoration (case study:Khojir National Park). Journal of Animal Environment, 8:9-16.
Saaty R W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9 (3-5):161-176.
Shao W J, Song X Q, Chen C, Zhao L, Jin L, Liao W B. 2022. Diver sity and distribution pattern of amphibians and reptiles in Yingjing Area of the Giant Panda National Park. Chinese Journal of Zool ogy, 57 (5):707-721. (in Chinese)
Shen G Z, Lan T Y, Deng S Y, Wang Y, Xu W T, Xie Z Q. 2023. Giant panda-focused conservation has limited value in maintaining bio diversity and carbon sequestration. Science of the Total Environ ment, 880 (2):163186.
Strassburg B B N, Iribarrem A, Beyer H L, Cordeiro C L, Crouzeilles R, Jakovac C C, Junqueira A B, Lacerda E, Latawiec A E, Balm ford A, Brooks T M, Butchart S H M, Robin L, Chazdon R L, Erb K H, Brancalion P, Buchanan G, Cooper D, Díaz S, Donald P F, Kapos V, Leclère D, Miles L, Obersteiner M, Plutzar C, Scar amuzza C A D M, Scarano F R, Visconti P. 2020. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature, 586 (7831):724-729.
Sun X, Long Z X, Jia J B. 2022. Identifying core habitats and corri dors for giant pandas by combining multiscale random forest and connectivity analysis. Ecology and Evolution, 12 (2):1-17.
Tan Z. 2005. The study on the normal intestinal microflora of the gi ant panda returned to wild and the giant panda in captivity. Mas ter thesis. Chengdu:Sichuan University. (in Chinese)
Teng J R, Huang H L, Wang J H, Li H F, Han B. 2010. Preliminary analysis on the habitat characteristics of the giant panda in Bai shuijiang Nature Reserve, Gansu Province. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 29 (4):653-656. (in Chinese)
Tian J, Zhu S Y, Zhang X F, He L W, Gu X D, Guan T P, Li S. 2021.The diversity of large- and medium-sized terrestrial mammals and birds in the Giant Panda National Park:a meta-analysis based on camera-trapping data. Biodiversity Science, 29 (11):1490-1504.(in Chinese)
Wang H L, Zhong J S, Xu Y F, Luo G, Jiang B Y, Hu Q, Lin Y C, Ran J H. 2022. Automatically detecting the wild giant panda using deep learning with context and species distribution model. Eco logical Informatics, 72:101868.
Wang X Y, Zhen J, Meng Q K. 2023. Spatial Observation of Giant Panda Habitat:Techniques and Methods. Springer Nature.
Wang X, Huang J Y, Connor T A, Bai W K, Zhang J D, Wei W, Zhang Z J, Liu D, Zhou C Q. 2019. Impact of livestock grazing on bio diversity and giant panda habitat. The Journal of Wildlife Man agement, 83:1592-1597.
Wang Y, Zhao P X. 2012. Habitat assessment of giant panda in Qing muchuan Nature Reserve, Shaanxi Province of Northwest China.
Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 23 (1):206-212. (in Chi nese)
Wanghe K Y, Guo X L, Hu F X, Ahmad S, Jin X W, Khan T U, Xiao Y Q, Luan X F. 2020. Spatial coincidence between mining activi ties and protected areas of giant panda habitat:the geographic overlaps and implications for conservation. Biological Conserva tion, 247:108600.
Wu Z J, Li Y M. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on survival of animal populations. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23 (11):2424-2435.(in Chinese)
Xiu L N. 2011. Evaluating on regional land ecological security based on OWA-GIS. Ph. D thesis. Beijing:China University of Geosci ences (Beijing). (in Chinese)
Yager R R. 1998. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation opera tors in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 1 (8):183-190.
Yang H B, Huang Q Y, Zhang J D, Songer M, Liu J G. 2021.Range-wide assessment of the impact of China's nature reserves on giant panda habitat quality. The Science of the Total Environ ment, 769:145081.
Yang H B, Viña A, Tang Y, Zhang J D, Wang F, Zhao Z Q, Liu J G. 2017. Range-wide evaluation of wildlife habitat change:a demon stration using giant pandas. Biological Conservation, 213:203-209.
Yang M. 2022. Spatial analysis of ecological corridors in Giant Panda National Park based on GIS. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 4 (3):123-127.
Yang Z S, Gu X D, Nie Y G, Huang F, Huang Y, Dai Q, Hu Y B, Yang Y, Zhou X, Zhang H M, Yang X Y, Wei F W. 2018. Reintroduc tion of the giant panda into the wild:a good start suggests a bright future. Biological Conservation, 217:181-186.
Zeng Z. 2021. Research on the wild release targets of giant pandas in Sichuan Province based on the reality, climate change, and influ enced conditions of canine distemper. Ph. D thesis. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University. (in Chinese)
Zhang J D, Hull V, Huang J Y, Yang W, Zhou S Q, Xu W H, Huang Y, Ouyang Z Y, Zhang H M, Liu J G. 2014. Natural recovery and restoration in giant panda habitat after the Wenchuan earthquake.Forest Ecology and Management, 319:1-9.
Zhang J D, Hull V, Huang J Y, Zhou S Q, Li R G, Liu D, Huang Y, Li D S, Xu W H, Zhang H M, Liu J G, Ouyang Z Y. 2011. Circa dian activity pattern of giant pandas during the bamboo growing season. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31 (10):2655-2661. (in Chinese)
Zhang J D, Hull V, Ouyang Z Y. 2013. A review of home range stud ies. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33 (11):3269-3279. (in Chinese)
Zhang W W. 2014. The habitat quality evaluation of giant panda in Wanglang Nature Reserve. Master thesis. Beijing:Beijing For estry University. (in Chinese)
Zhang Z Y, Jin G, Guo B S, Dong Y, Chen K. 2020. Research on the spatial vulnerability and resilience of land in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on multi-criteria decision. Journal of Natu ral Resources, 35 (1):95-105. (in Chinese)
Zhou S J, Zhang H M, Li D S. 2010. Conservation and management strategies of habitats based on the foraging behavior of giant pan das. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 29 (3):340-345. (in Chinese)
Zhou X H, Yang X T, Tang J C, Zhang W. 2016. The progress and practice of consistency between in situ wildlife conservation strat egies and the economic development of local people. Acta Eco logica Sinica, 36 (21):6708-6718. (in Chinese)
马亦生, 马青青, 孙亮, 李帅, 周刚, 李涛, 董乐乐,曹李华, 朱大鹏. 2020. 基于红外相机技术对佛坪国家级自然保护区大熊猫季节性空间分布与活动模式的研究. 动物学杂志, 55 (1):20-28.
马克平, 刘灿然, 刘玉明. 1995. 生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅱ β 多样性的测度方法. 生物多样性, 3 (1):38-43.
王芸, 赵鹏祥. 2012. 青木川自然保护区大熊猫生境评价. 应用生态学报, 23 (1):206-212.
田佳, 朱淑怡, 张晓峰, 何礼文, 古晓东, 官天培, 李晟. 2021. 大熊猫国家公园的地栖大中型鸟兽多样性现状:基于红外相机数据的分析. 生物多样性, 29 (11):1490-1504.
白文科, 张晋东, 董鑫, 李程, 古晓东, 周材权. 2017. 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫空间利用格局动态变化特征. 兽类学报, 37 (4):327-335.
刘焱序, 彭建, 韩忆楠, 魏海, 杜悦悦. 2014. 基于 OWA 的低丘缓坡建设开发适宜性评价:以云南大理白族自治州为例. 生态学报, 34 (12):3188-3197.
关军洪, 曹钰, 吴天煜, 董丽. 2017. 北京首云铁矿山废弃地植被修复调查研究. 中国园林, 33 (11):13-18.
李尚锦, 周学云, 高文良, 胡瑶. 2022. 1991~2020 年雅安地区降水特征研究. 高原山地气象研究, 42 (S2):8-13.
李忠, 何胜山, 罗永, 周世强, 孙萌萌, 屈元元, 周小平, 张和民. 2018. 大熊猫野化培训的生境选择特性. 四川林业科技, 39(6):20-24, 39.
李晟, 冯杰, 李彬彬, 吕植. 2021. 大熊猫国家公园体制试点的经验与挑战. 生物多样性, 29 (3):307-311.
李爽, 康东伟, 宋国华, 李俊清. 2017. 大熊猫利用生境与人工林环境的比较研究. 生物学杂志, 34 (2):55-57.
李锋, 成超男, 杨锐. 2022. 生态系统修复国内外研究进展与展望.生物多样性, 30 (10):312-323.
李程. 2019. 人为干扰下凉山山系大熊猫栖息地适宜性时空动态变化特征. 南充:西华师范大学硕士学位论文.
李皓, 翟月鹏, 杨小龙, 董旭彤, 杨佳, 马子川, 刘敬泽. 2022. 基于层次分析-有序加权平均多准则评估的雄安新区生态安全格局模拟研究. 生态学报, 42 (1):150-160.
张正昱, 金贵, 郭柏枢, 董寅, 陈坤. 2020. 基于多准则决策的长江经济带国土空间脆弱性与恢复力研究. 自然资源学报, 35 (1):95-105.
张晋东, Hull V, 黄金燕, 周世强, 李仁贵, 刘巅, 黄炎, 李德生, 徐卫华, 张和民, 刘建国, 欧阳志云. 2011. 大熊猫取食竹笋期间的昼夜活动节律和强度. 生态学报, 31 (10):2655-2661.
张晋东, Hull V, 欧阳志云. 2013. 家域研究进展. 生态学报, 33 (11):3269-3279.
张巍巍. 2014. 王朗自然保护区大熊猫生境质量评价. 北京:北京林业大学硕士学位论文.
陈浩, 王刚, 王成, 薛菲, 成海, 张亚楠. 2024. 野化放归丹顶鹤活动节律、家域特征和栖息地选择研究. 生态学报, 44 (4):1526-1538.
邵威杰, 宋心强, 陈川, 赵丽, 金龙, 廖文波. 2022. 大熊猫国家公园荥经片区两栖爬行动物多样性及海拔分布格局. 动物学杂志, 57 (5):707-721.
武正军, 李义明. 2003. 生境破碎化对动物种群存活的影响. 生态学报, 23 (11):2424-2435.
林玲, 王卫红, 冉茂莹, 耿诗画, 杨元继. 2022. 王朗自然保护区大熊猫生境适宜性及潜在活动区域. 东北林业大学学报, 50 (1):87-92.
欧阳志云, 李振新, 刘建国, 安力, 张和民, 谭迎春, 周世强. 2002. 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫生境恢复过程研究. 生态学报, (11):1840-1849.
周世强, 张和民, 李德生. 2010. 大熊猫觅食行为的栖息地管理策略. 四川动物, 29 (3):340-345.
周学红, 杨锡涛, 唐谨成, 张伟. 2016. 野生动物就地保护与其分布地经济发展的相容性. 生态学报, 36 (21):6708-6718.
胡继平, 杨筱, 姜鑫贵, 阮向东. 2022. 基于层次分析法的野生动物及其栖息地生态影响评价研究. 西部林业科学, 51 (3):24-31.
胡瑞华, 张黎明, 何晓安, 何胜山, 胡宇. 2023. 大熊猫国家公园国宝栖息地连通成片. 森林与人类, (1):36-49.
南晓娜, 王茸仙, 张新兵. 2021. 陕西秦岭大熊猫种群和栖息地现状及保护管理规划. 野生动物学报, 42 (3):663-674.
修丽娜. 2011. 基于 OWA-GIS 的区域土地生态安全评价研究. 北京:中国地质大学 (北京) 博士学位论文.
秦炜锐, 潘翰, 程勇, 宋心强, 付明霞, 刘景怡, 张远彬, 周材权, 杨彪. 2023. 大熊猫栖息地森林群落乔木层与林下冷箭竹关系研究. 西华师范大学学报 (自然科学版), 44 (1):13-18.
贾伟. 2023. 四川省大相岭泥巴山廊道大熊猫微生境研究. 贵阳:贵州师范大学硕士学位论文.
郭桢杉. 2022. 地震后受损大熊猫栖息地植被恢复时空特征分析.南充:西华师范大学硕士学位论文.
菅亚丹. 2017. 陕西周至老县城国家级自然保护区大熊猫种群栖息地选择适应性研究. 西安:西北大学硕士学位论文.
符建荣, 孙治宇, 刘少英, 扶志宏, 刘洋, 王新, 赵杰, 蔡国. 2008. 四川大相岭自然保护区的鸟类资源. 四川林业科技, (3):31-37.
董冰楠. 2018. 邛崃山系大熊猫生境选择及栖息地干扰时空变化研究. 南充:西华师范大学硕士学位论文.
蒋文翠, 杨继清, 彭尔瑞, 王会云, 孙熙宁, 董恒文, 李荣亮. 2022. 矿山生态修复研究进展. 矿业研究与开发, 42 (4):127-132.
曾赞. 2021. 基于现实、气候变化和犬瘟热影响条件下的四川省大熊猫野化放归目标研究. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学博士学位论文.
谭志. 2004. 野外放归大熊猫和圈养大熊猫肠道正常菌群的研究.
成都:四川大学硕士学位论文.
滕继荣, 黄华梨, 王建宏, 李宏飞, 韩波. 2010. 甘肃白水江自然保护区大熊猫栖息地生境特征初步分析. 四川动物, 29 (4):653-656.

[1]	ZHANG Rumei, ZHANG Qing, YANG Xiao, ZHANG Farui, ZHAO Ding, PANG Dehong, YANG Kong, GUAN Tianpei. Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of mammal diversity in alpine ecosystems: a case study in Xuebaoding area of Giant Panda National Park [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(5): 533-543.
[2]	SU Xiaoyan, YANG Mei, YAN Xia, HOU Rong, XIAO Mei, WANG Jinsong, LIU Sheng, WANG Lucai, ZHANG Wenping, HUANG Hongxiu. Epidemiology and antibiotics resistance of Escherichia coli from wild animals and their environment in Guangyuan area of Giant Panda National Park [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(4): 430-442.
[3]	Conglei LI, Shurong TIAN, Yucheng SONG, Hong ZHANG, Dali GAO, Daode YANG, Xiaojie GUI. Population viability analysis of Père David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus) in Dongting Lake, Hunan Province [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(3): 280-292.

The research on restoration priority assessment of damaged giant panda habitats based on multi-criteria decision analysis of AHP-OWA

基于多准则决策分析评价大熊猫受损栖息地恢复优先级

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Recommended Articles

Metrics