研究论文

个体亲近程度对藏酋猴攻击行为的影响

  • 张通 ,
  • 王希 ,
  • 张启信 ,
  • 李进华
展开
  • 1.安徽大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230601
    2.黄山生物多样性与短尾猴行为生态学国际联合研究中心,合肥 230601
    3.合肥师范学院生命科学学院,合肥 230601
张通 (1995- ),男,硕士研究生,主要从事灵长类行为生态研究.
Corresponding author, E-mail: jhli@ahu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2021-11-26

  录用日期: 2022-03-29

  网络出版日期: 2022-07-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(31672307);安徽省中央引导地方科技发展专项(2019b11030018)

The effects of affiliative relationship on aggressive behavior in Tibetan macaques

  • Tong ZHANG ,
  • Xi WANG ,
  • Qixin ZHANG ,
  • Jinhua LI
Expand
  • 1.School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
    2.International Collaborative Research Center for Huangshan Biodiversity and Tibetan Macaque Behavioral Ecology, Hefei 230601, China
    3.School of Life Sciences, Hefei Normal University, Hefei 230601, China

Received date: 2021-11-26

  Accepted date: 2022-03-29

  Online published: 2022-07-22

摘要

友好和冲突行为决定了群居动物的社会结构及其表现形式,表现为个体间近距差异。但目前尚不清楚藏酋猴个体间亲近关系的差异性是否会影响冲突和攻击的强度。本研究于2020年9月至2021年5月对栖息于安徽黄山的藏酋猴鱼鳞坑YA1群进行跟踪观察,采用目标动物取样法采集行为数据,全事件记录法用于攻击行为数据的补充,分析个体间近距、理毛和攻击行为矩阵的关系,并采用GLMM模型探讨攻击行为的影响因素。结果显示:藏酋猴个体间近距指数越大,理毛时间越长;个体间近距指数矩阵与攻击总次数、轻度攻击和重度攻击次数矩阵均呈显著正相关;个体间亲近关系越紧密,攻击次数和强度越大,但相较雄性间和异性间,雌性间攻击次数和强度最小。这些结果表明,个体间近距持续时间会增加理毛和攻击行为的可能性,雌性个体间社会关系更稳定,但并未发现藏酋猴根据个体间亲近关系调整攻击强度。本研究为进一步了解多雌多雄的藏酋猴群体的社会关系和社会结构提供了数据支持。

本文引用格式

张通 , 王希 , 张启信 , 李进华 . 个体亲近程度对藏酋猴攻击行为的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2022 , 42(4) : 370 -378 . DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150644

Abstract

Affiliative and agonistic behaviors determine the social structure and its systems in animal groups, which are manifested as differences in proximity between individuals. However, it is unclear whether differences in affinity affect the intensity of conflict and aggression. Thus, we conducted a study on one group of Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana, Yulinkeng, YA1) from September 2020 to May 2021 in Anhui, China. We used focal animal and behavioral sampling methods to record the proximity, grooming, and aggressive behavior of macaques. We correlated the proximity and grooming with aggressive behavior of those matrices, and ran GLMM models to explore the factors that might affect aggressive interaction among individuals. The results showed that the greater the proximity index was, the longer the grooming duration between group individuals had. The matrix based on the proximity index was positively correlated with the total number of aggression, the number of mild aggression, and the number of intense aggression. Individuals with closer affiliative relationships had more often and more heavily aggression towards each other. When comparing differences between sex, we found the frequency and intensity of aggression among females were less than among males. These results suggest that the close proximity could increase the likelihood of grooming and aggression between macaques and that the social relationship between females is more stable. We did not find that the macaques adjust the intensity of aggression according to their affinity. This study provided theoretical support for understanding the social relationship and social structure of multi-male and multi-female Tibetan macaques.

参考文献

null Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49 (3): 227-267.
null Arseneau?Robar T J M, Joyce M M, Stead S M, Teichroeb J A. 2018. Proximity and grooming patterns reveal opposite-sex bonding in Rwenzori Angolan colobus monkeys (Colobus angolensis ruwenzorii). Primates, 59 (3): 267-279.
null Berman C M, Ionica C S, Li J H. 2004. Dominance style among Macaca thibetana on Mt. Huangshan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 25 (6): 1283-1312.
null Berman C M, Ogawa H, Ionica C, Yin H B, Li J H. 2008. Variation in kin bias over time in a group of Tibetan macaques at Huangshan, China: contest competition, time constraints or risk response? Behaviour, 145: 863-896.
null Chalian V G, Meishvili N B. 2006. Aggression and composition of conflicting pairs in green monkeys. Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal Imeni IM Sechenova, 92 (8): 984-989.
null Cowl V B, Walker S L, Shultz S. 2021. Reproductive males are effective at managing conflict in captive Sulawesi crested macaques (Macaca nigra). American Journal of Primatology, 83 (7): e23266.
null Crofoot M C, Rubenstein D I, Maiya A S, Berger?Wolf T Y. 2011. Aggression, grooming and group?level cooperation in white?faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus): insights from social networks. American Journal of Primatology, 73 (8): 821-833.
null De Filippis B, Chiarotti F, Vitale A. 2009. Severe intragroup aggressions in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12 (3): 214-222.
null Duboscq J, Agil M, Engelhardt A, Thierry B. 2014. The function of postconflict interactions: new prospects from the study of a tolerant species of primate. Animal Behaviour, 87: 107-120.
null Duboscq J, Neumann C, Agil M, Perwitasari?Farajallah D, Engelhardt A. 2017. Degrees of freedom in social bonds of crested macaque females. Animal Behaviour, 123: 411-426.
null Edenbrow M, Croft D P. 2012. Kin and familiarity influence association preferences and aggression in the mangrove killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus . Journal of Fish Biology, 80 (3): 503-518.
null Feder J A, Lu A, Koenig A, Borries C. 2019. The costs of competition: injury patterns in 2 Asian colobine monkeys. Behavioral Ecology, 30 (5): 1242-1253.
null Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H. 2011. Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65 (1): 47-55.
null Gammell M P, Vries H D, Jennings D J, Carlin C M, Hayden T J. 2003. David’s score: a more appropriate dominance ranking method than Clutton?Brocket al.’s index. Animal Behaviour, 66 (Part 3): 601-605.
null Gill T. 2017. Grooming and aggression: a comparative study of Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) and Hanuman langurs (Prebystis entellus). Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India, 66 (1-2): 247-260.
null Guan Z H, Huang B, Ning W H, Ni Q Y, Jiang X L. 2013. Proximity association in polygynous western black crested gibbons (Nomascus concolor jingdongensis): network structure and seasonality. Zoological Research, 34 (E1): E1-8.
null Hashimoto C, Takenaka O, Furuichi T. 1996. Matrilineal kin relationship and social behavior of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus): Sequencing the D-loop region of mitochondrial DNA. Primates, 37 (3): 305-318.
null Healy K. 2005. An R and S-PLUS companion to applied regression. Sociological Methods & Research, 34 (1): 137-140.
null Innocent T M, West S A, Sanderson J L, Hyrkkanen N, Reece S E. 2011. Lethal combat over limited resources: testing the importance of competitors and kin. Behavioral Ecology, 22 (5): 923-931.
null Kalbitz J, Ostner J, Schuelke O. 2016. Strong, equitable and long?term social bonds in the dispersing sex in Assamese macaques. Animal Behaviour, 113: 13-22.
null Kawazoe T. 2021. Male-male social bonds predict tolerance but not coalition formation in wild Japanese macaques. Primates, 62 (1): 91-101.
null Krawczak M, Peter N, Bercovitch F, Streich W J, Widdig A. 2002. Affiliation and aggression among adult female rhesus macaques: A genetic analysis of paternal cohorts. Behaviour, 139 (2): 371-391.
null Kummer H. 1978. On the value of social relationships to nonhuman primates: a heuristic scheme. Social Science Information, 17 (4-5): 687-705.
null Li J H, Sun L X, Kappeler P M. 2020. The Behavioral Ecology of the Tibetan Macaque. Springer Nature.
null Lu A, Koenig A, Borries C. 2008. Formal submission, tolerance and socioecological models: a test with female Hanuman langurs. Animal Behaviour, 76 (2): 415-428.
null Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed?effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (2): 133-142.
null Nishida T. 1968. The social group of wild chimpanzees in the Mahali Mountains. Primates, 9 (3): 167-224.
null Noe R. 2006. Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together. Animal Behaviour, 71: 1-18.
null Perry S. 1996. Female‐female social relationships in wild white‐faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus .American Journal of Primatology, 40 (2): 167-182.
null Reddy R B, Mitani J C. 2020. Adolescent and young adult male chimpanzees form affiliative, yet aggressive, relationships with females. Journal of Human Evolution, 144.DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102813 .
null Rowell T E, Wilson C, Cords M. 1991. Reciprocity and partner preference in grooming of female blue monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 12 (4): 319-336.
null Samuni L, Mielke A, Preis A, Crockford C, Wittig R M. 2020. Intergroup competition enhances chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) in-group cohesion. International Journal of Primatology, 41 (2): 342-362.
null Schino G, Alessandrini A. 2015. Short-term costs and benefits of grooming in Japanese macaques. Primates, 56 (3): 253-257.
null Schuelke O, Dumdey N, Ostner J. 2020. Selective attention for affiliative and agonistic interactions of dominants and close affiliates in macaques. Scientific Reports, 10 (1): 1-8.
null Seyfarth R M, Cheney D L. 2012. The evolutionary origins of friendship. Annual Review of Psychology, 63: 153-177.
null Shanee S. 2014. Yellow-tailed woolly monkey (Lagothrix flavicauda) proximal spacing and forest strata use in La Esperanza, Peru. Primates, 55 (4): 515-523.
null Silk J B, Beehner J C, Bergman T J, Crockford C, Engh A L, Moscovice L R, Wittig R M, Seyfarth R M, Cheney D L. 2010. Female chacma baboons form strong, equitable, and enduring social bonds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64 (11): 1733-1747.
null Wang X, Li J H, Xia D P, Chen R, Zhu Y, Zhang M, Wang S. 2009. Comparisons on reproductive and aggressive behaviors in male Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana) of two different operational sex ratio troops at Huangshan, China. Zoological Research, 30 (1): 83-89.
null Wells K D, Clutton?Brock T H, Haarvey P H, Krebs J R, Davies N B. 1991. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, 29 (4): 341-346.
null Wey T W, Blumstein D T. 2010. Social cohesion in yellow?bellied marmots is established through age and kin structuring. Animal Behaviour, 79 (6): 1343-1352.
null Xia D P, Li J H, Garber P A, Sun L X, Zhu Y, Sun B H. 2012. Grooming reciprocity in female Tibetan macaques Macaca thibetana . American Journal of Primatology, 74 (6): 569-579.
null Zhang H, Lu N J, Feng C Y, Thurston S W, Xia Y L, Zhu L, Tu X M. 2011. On fitting generalized linear mixed?effects models for binary responses using different statistical packages. Statistics in Medicine, 30 (20): 2562-2572.
文章导航

/

〈 〉