研究论文

不同养殖场林麝肠道微生物组成和功能的差异

  • 江峰 ,
  • 宋鹏飞 ,
  • 张婧捷 ,
  • 高红梅 ,
  • 汪海静 ,
  • 蔡振媛 ,
  • 刘道鑫 ,
  • 张同作
展开
  • 1.中国科学院西北高原生物研究所,高原生物适应与进化重点实验室,西宁 810001
    2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
    3.青海省动物生态基因组学重点实验室,西宁 810001
江峰 (1992- ),男,博士,主要从事动物生态学、保护生物学研究. E-mail: jiangfeng@nwipb.cas.cn
Corresponding author, E-mail: zhangtz@nwipb.cas.cn

收稿日期: 2022-06-06

  录用日期: 2022-10-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-23

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA23060602);青海省重点研发与转化计划(2019-SF-150);中国科学院-青海省人民政府三江源国家公园联合研究专项(LHZX-2020-01)

Comparative analysis of gut microbial composition and functions of forest musk deer in different breeding centres

  • Feng JIANG ,
  • Pengfei SONG ,
  • Jingjie ZHANG ,
  • Hongmei GAO ,
  • Haijing WANG ,
  • Zhenyuan CAI ,
  • Daoxin LIU ,
  • Tongzuo ZHANG
Expand
  • 1.Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    3.Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Xining 810001, China

Received date: 2022-06-06

  Accepted date: 2022-10-20

  Online published: 2023-03-23

摘要

肠道疾病是养殖林麝 (Moschus berezovskii) 常见疾病。动物肠道微生物伴随宿主进化并与胃肠道构成了复杂的微生态系统。为探究不同饲养环境对圈养林麝肠道微生物组成和功能的影响,本研究对采自国内5个不同养殖场的215份粪便样品进行了16S rRNA基因高通量测序,对比分析不同养殖场林麝肠道微生物组成、多样性和功能的差异。结果显示,厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门是未喂食复合益生菌的祁连县养殖场林麝肠道菌群的绝对优势菌门,而喂食复合益生菌的甘肃两当县和陕西凤县的4家养殖场林麝肠道菌群的绝对优势菌门为厚壁菌门和变形菌门。不同养殖场林麝肠道菌群组成、优势菌门、优势菌属、潜在致病菌、代谢及疾病相关功能均有显著差异。祁连县养殖场林麝肠道微生物的α多样性和疾病相关功能表达量显著低于其他养殖场,并以肠型2为主,其主导菌为厚壁菌门、UCG-005和拟杆菌属;两当县和凤县的4家养殖场林麝肠道菌群潜在致病菌相对丰度较低。本研究推测食物组成差异可能是导致不同养殖场林麝肠道微生物差异的主要因素,复合益生菌的使用可能是导致α多样性和潜在致病菌下降的重要因素。该结果可为林麝的人工养殖和有效管理提供科学依据,也对人工饲养环境评估和未来的再引入计划具有一定指导意义。

本文引用格式

江峰 , 宋鹏飞 , 张婧捷 , 高红梅 , 汪海静 , 蔡振媛 , 刘道鑫 , 张同作 . 不同养殖场林麝肠道微生物组成和功能的差异[J]. 兽类学报, 2023 , 43(2) : 129 -140 . DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150701

Abstract

Intestinal diseases are common in the breeding of forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii, FMD). Gut microbiota has evolved with the host and formed a complex microecosystem with the gastrointestinal tract of animals. To compare the effects of different breeding environments on gut microbial composition and functions of captive FMD, a total of 215 fresh feces samples were collected from 5 different breeding centres in China, and a 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing was performed. The differences in gut microbial composition, diversity, and functions of FMD from different breeding centres were analyzed. The results showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroides were the absolute dominant bacteria phyla in the gut microbiota of FMD fed without compound probiotics from Qilian County, while Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the absolute dominant bacteria in the gut microbiota of FMD fed with compound probiotics from Liangdang County and Feng County. The composition, dominant bacteria phyla, dominant bacteria genera, potential pathogenic bacteria, metabolism-related, and disease-related functions of gut microbiota in FMD from different breeding centres were significantly different. The α diversity and disease-related function enrichment of gut microbiota in FMD from Qilian were significantly lower than those from other breeding centres, and enterotype 2 was dominant, with Firmicutes, UCG-005,and Bacteroides as the marker bacteria. The relative abundance of potential pathogenic bacteria of gut microbiota in FMD from Liangdang and Feng Counties was low. We speculated that the difference in food composition might be the main factor leading to the difference in the gut microbiota of FMD from different breeding centres, and the use of compound probiotics might be an important factor leading to the decrease of α diversity and potential pathogenic bacteria. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for the artificial breeding management of FMD, and also have certain significance for the assessment of the artificial breeding environment and the plan of reintroduction in the future.

参考文献

null B?ckhed F, Ley R E, Sonnenburg J L, Peterson D A, Gordon J I. 2005. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science, 307 (5717): 1915-1920.
null Bolger A M, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30: 2114-2120.
null Chen L, Liu M, Zhu J, Gao Y, Sha W L, Ding H X, Jiang W J, Wu S P. 2020. Age, gender, and feeding environment influence fecal microbial diversity in Spotted Hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Current Microbiology, 77 (7): 1139-1149.
null Costello E K, Lauber C L, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon J I, Knight R. 2009. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science, 326 (5960): 1694-1697.
null Cui X X, Wang Z F, Yan T H, Chang S H, Wang H, Hou F J. 2019. Rumen bacterial diversity of Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries) associated with different forage types on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 65 (12): 859-869.
null David L A, Maurice C F, Carmody R N, Gootenberg D B, Button J E, Wolfe B E, Ling A V, Devlin A S, Varma Y, Fischbach M A, Biddinger S B, Dutton R J, Turnbaugh P J. 2014. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature, 505 (7484): 559-563.
null De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet J B, Massart S, Collini S, Pieraccini G, Lionetti P. 2010. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 107 (33): 14691-14696.
null Edgar R C. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods, 10 (10): 996-998.
null Ezenwa V O, Gerardo N M, Inouye D W, Medina M, Xavier J B. 2012. Microbiology. Animal behavior and the microbiome. Science, 338 (6104): 198-199.
null Fan J M, Zheng X L, Wang H Y, Qi H, Jiang B M, Qiao M P, Zhou J W, Bu S H. 2019. Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure in three forest musk deer captive populations with different origins. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics, 9 (4): 1037-1044.
null Fan Z X, Li W J, Jin J Z, Cui K, Yan C C, Peng C J, Jian Z Y, Bu P, Price M, Zhang X Y, Shen Y M, Li J, Qi W H, Yue B S. 2018. The draft genome sequence of forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii). Gigascience, 7 (4): 1-6.
null Fountain?Jones N M, Clark N J, Kinsley A C, Carstensen M, Forester J, Johnson T J, Miller E A, Moore S, Wolf T M, Craft M E. 2020. Microbial associations and spatial proximity predict North American moose (Alces alces) gastrointestinal community composition. Journal of Animal Ecology, 89 (3): 817-828.
null Heinritz S N, Weiss E, Eklund M, Aumiller T, Louis S, Rings A, Messner S, Camarinha?Silva A, Seifert J, Bischoff S C, Mosenthin R. 2016. Intestinal microbiota and microbial metabolites are changed in a pig model fed a High-Fat/Low-Fiber or a Low-Fat/High-Fiber Diet. PLoS ONE, 11 (4): 0154329.
null Hu X L, Liu G, Shafer A B A, Wei Y T, Zhou J, Lin S, Wu H, Zhou M, Hu D F, Liu S Q. 2017. Comparative analysis of the gut microbial communities in forest and alpine musk deer using high?throughput sequencing. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8: 572.
null Hu X L. 2017. The quantitative studies on the dynamics of gastrointestinal parasites and microbiota in forest musk deer and the indicative function on health. Ph.D thesis. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University. (in Chinese)
null Jewell K A, McCormick C A, Odt C L, Weimer P J, Suen G. 2015. Ruminal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed efficiency. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 81 (14): 4697-4710.
null Jiang F, Gao H M, Qin W, Song P F, Wang H J, Zhang J J, Liu D X, Wang D, Zhang T Z. 2021. Marked seasonal variation in structure and function of gut microbiota in forest and alpine musk deer. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12: 699797.
null La Reau A J, Meier?Kolthoff J P, Suen G. 2016. Sequence-based analysis of the genus Ruminococcus resolves its phylogeny and reveals strong host association. Microbial Genomics, 2 (12): 1-13.
null La Reau A J, Suen G. 2018.The ruminococci: key symbionts of the gut ecosystem. Journal of Microbiology, 56 (3): 199-208.
null Lang J M, Pan C, Cantor R M, Tang W H W, Garcia?Garcia J C, Kurtz I, Hazen S L, Bergeron N, Krauss R M, Lusis A J. 2018. Impact of individual traits, saturated fat, and protein source on the gut microbiome. mBio, 9 (6): e01604-18.
null Ley R E, Peterson D A, Gordon J I. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell, 124 (4): 837-848.
null Li Y M, Hu X L, Yang S, Zhou J T, Zhang T X, Qi L, Sun X N, Fan M Y, Xu S H, Cha M H, Zhang M S, Lin S B, Liu S Q, Hu D F. 2017. Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota composition between captive and wild forest musk deer. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8: 1705.
null Li Y M, Hu X L, Yang S, Zhou J T, Qi L, Sun X M, Fan M Y, Xu S H, Cha M H, Zhang M S, Lin S B, Liu S Q, Hu D F. 2018. Comparison between the fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and diarrheic captive musk deer. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9: 300.
null Liu X, Zhao W, Yu D, Cheng J G, Luo Y, Wang Y, Yang Z X, Yao X P, Wu S S, Wang W Y, Yang W, Li D Q, Wu Y M. 2019. Effects of compound probiotics on the weight, immunity performance and fecal microbiota of forest musk deer. Scientific Reports, 9 (1): 19146.
null Lv X H, Qiao J Y, Wu X M, Su L N. 2009. A review of mainly affected on musk?deer diseases: purulent, respiratory system and parasitic diseases. Journal of Economic Animal, 13 (2): 104-107. (in Chinese)
null Mago? T, Salzberg S L. 2021. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 27 (21): 2957-2963.
null Matulova M, Nouaille R, Capek P, Péan M, Delort A M, Forano E. 2008. NMR study of cellulose and wheat straw degradation by Ruminococcus albus 20. FEBS Journal, 275 (13): 3503-3511.
null Nicholson J K, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, Pettersson S. 2012. Host-Gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science, 336 (6086): 1262-1267.
null O’Toole P W, Jeffery I B. 2015. Gut microbiota and aging. Science, 350 (6265): 1214-1215.
null Shanahan F. 2010. Probiotics in perspective. Gastroenterology, 139 (6): 1808-1812.
null Sun X N, Cai R B, Jin X L, Shafer A B A, Hu X L, Yang S, Li Y M, Qi L, Liu S Q, Hu D F. 2018. Blood transcriptomics of captive forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) and possible associations with the immune response to abscesses. Scientific Reports, 8 (1): 599.
null Wan Y, Wang F L, Yuan J H, Li J, Jiang D D, Zhang J J, Li H, Wang R Y, Tang J, Huang T, Zheng J S, Sinclair A J, Mann J, Li D. 2019. Effects of dietary fat on gut microbiota and faecal metabolites, and their relationship with cardiometabolic risk factors: a 6-month randomised controlled-feeding trial. Gut, 68 (8): 1417-1429.
null Wang Q, Garrity G M, Tiedje J M, Cole J R. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73 (16): 5261-5267.
null Wang Y Y, Cao P H, Wang L, Zhao Z Y, Chen Y L, Yang Y X. 2017. Bacterial community diversity associated with different levels of dietary nutrition in the rumen of sheep. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101 (9): 3717-3728.
null Waters J L, Ley R E. 2019. The human gut bacteria Christensenellaceae are widespread, heritable, and associated with health. BMC Biology, 17 (1): 83.
null Wu S R, Cui Z H, Chen X D, Zheng L X, Ren H, Wang D D, Yao J H. 2021. Diet-ruminal microbiome-host crosstalk contributes to differential effects of calf starter and alfalfa hay on rumen epithelial development and pancreatic α-amylase activity in yak calves - ScienceDirect. Journal of Dairy Science, 104 (4): 4326-4340.
null Yang Q S, Meng X X, Xia L, Feng Z J. 2003. Conservation status and causes of decline of musk deer (Moschus spp.) in China. Biological Conservation, 109 (3): 333-342.
null Yin J, Li Y Y, Han H, Chen S, Gao J, Liu G, Wu X, Deng J P, Yu Q F, Huang X G, Fang R J, Li T J, Reiter R J, Zhang D, Zhu C R, Zhu G Q, Ren W K, Yin Y L. 2018. Melatonin reprogramming of gut microbiota improves lipid dysmetabolism in high-fat diet-fed mice. Journal of Pineal Research, 65 (4): e12524.
null Yoo J Y, Groer M, Dutra S V O, Sarkar A, McSkimming D I. 2020. Gut microbiota and immune system interactions. Microorganisms, 8 (10): 1587.
null Zhang C H, Zhang M H, Wang S Y, Han R J, Cao Y F, Hua W Y, Mao Y J, Zhang X J, Pang X Y, Wei C C, Zhao G P, Chen Y, Zhao L P. 2010. Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet relevant to development of metabolic syndromes in mice. ISME Journal, 4 (2): 232-241.
null Zhang Z G, Xu D M, Wang L, Hao J J, Wang J F, Zhou X, Wang W W, Qiu Q, Huang X D, Zhou J W, Long R F, Zhao F Q, Shi P. 2016. Convergent evolution of rumen microbiomes in high?altitude mammals. Current Biology, 26 (14): 1873-1879.
null Zhao X F, Zhang X Y, Chen Z S, Wang Z, Lu Y Y, Cheng D F. 2018. The divergence in bacterial components associated with Bactrocera dorsalis across developmental stages. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9: 114.
null Zhou C, Zhang W B, Wen Q C, Bu P, Gao J, Wang G N, Jin J Z, Song Y J, Sun X H, Zhang Y F, Jiang X, Yu H R, Peng C J, Shen Y M, Price M, Li J, Zhang X Y, Fan Z X, Yue B S. 2019. Comparative genomics reveals the genetic mechanisms of musk secretion and adaptive immunity in Chinese forest musk deer. Genome Biology and Evolution, 11 (4): 1019-1032.
null Zhou L Y, Xiao X H, Zhang Q, Zheng J, Li M, Yu M, Wang X J, Deng M Q, Zhai X, Li R R. 2018. Improved glucose and lipid metabolism in the early life of female offspring by maternal dietary genistein is associated with alterations in the gut microbiota. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 9: 516.
null 吕向辉, 乔继英, 吴晓民, 苏丽娜. 2009. 主要危害麝类的化脓性、呼吸系统疾病及寄生虫病研究. 经济动物学报, 13 (2): 104-107.
null 吴家炎, 王伟. 2006. 中国麝类. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
null 国家林业局. 2009. 中国重点陆生野生动物资源调查. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
null 胡晓龙. 2017. 林麝肠道寄生虫和菌群动态的量化研究及其健康指示作用. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学博士学位论文.
文章导航

/

〈 〉