云南省两种兽类新纪录——藏鼩鼱(Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko,1905)和甘肃鼩鼱(Sorex cansulus Thomas,1912)

doi:10.16829/j.slxb.150520

兽类学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 352-360.DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150520

云南省两种兽类新纪录——藏鼩鼱(Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko,1905)和甘肃鼩鼱(Sorex cansulus Thomas,1912)

宋文宇^1,2, 王洪娇², 李弈仙², 何水旺², 蒋学龙²

1 大理大学病原与媒介生物研究所, 云南省自然疫源性疾病防控技术重点实验室, 大理 671000;
2 中国科学院昆明动物研究所遗传资源与进化国家重点实验室, 昆明 650223

收稿日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2021-05-30 发布日期:2021-05-27
通讯作者: 蒋学龙,E-mail:jiangxl@mail.kiz.ac.cn
作者简介:宋文宇(1986-),男,动物学博士,助理研究员,主要从事群落生态学研究.
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合考察研究专题（2019QZKK0501）；国家重点研发计划课题（2017YFC0505200）

New records of Tibetan shrew(Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko,1905) and Gansu shrew(Sorex cansulus Thomas,1912) in Yunnan Province

SONG Wenyu^1,2, WANG Hongjiao², LI Yixian², HE Shuiwang², JIANG Xuelong²

1 Vector Laboratory, Institute of Pathogens and Vectors, Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Control and Prevention, Dali University, Dali 671000, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China

Received:2020-12-21 Online:2021-05-30 Published:2021-05-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前对藏鼩鼱（Sorex thibetanus）和甘肃鼩鼱（Sorex cansulus）的分布范围和生物学资料了解较少。2017年，在云南省西北部的高山区域采集了48号鼩鼱属（Sorex）动物标本。用形态学和基于Cyt b基因的分子系统学对采集标本进行了物种鉴定。结果显示来自4个地点的27号标本形态上与藏鼩鼱相符，来自2个地点的21号标本与甘肃鼩鼱相似，但存在一定差异。基于Kimura-2-parameter的遗传距离显示，藏鼩鼱组内遗传距离为0.46%，甘肃鼩鼱组内遗传距离为0.42%。它们与其它鼩鼱属物种的组间遗传距离分别为10.76%~17.04%和6.59%~14.52%。最大似然（Maximum likelihood）树结果显示，来自云南省西北部的两种鼩鼱动物分别与藏鼩鼱（BS=71%）和甘肃鼩鼱（BS=100%）构成单系。上述结果支持这两种鼩鼱属动物分别为藏鼩鼱和甘肃鼩鼱，均为云南省兽类新纪录。

关键词: 红齿鼩鼱, 区系, 古北界, 横断山

Abstract: Tibetan shrew(Sorex thibetanus) and Gansu shrew(Sorex cansulus) are two poorly known species of the genus Sorex. In 2017, 48 specimens of Sorex were collected in alpine areas of north-west Yunnan. The morphological characteristics and measurements of these specimens were compared with previous specimen records, and their phylogenetic relationships with other Sorex species were assessed based on Cyt b gene. Results show that 27 specimens from 4 sites are morphologically similar to S. thibetanus, while other 21 specimens from 2 sites are morphologically similar to S. cansulus, although with considerable differences. The intraspecific Kimura-2-parameter distance based on Cyt b was 0.46% for S. thibetanus and 0.42% for S. cansulus, while the distances between these two species to other Sorex species were 10.76%-17.04% and 6.59%-14.52%, respectively. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses support the two species are monophyletic to S. thibetanus(BS=71%) and S. cansulus (BS=100%), which both are new mammal records in Yunnan Province.

Key words: Red-toothed shrew, Fauna, Palaearctic, Hengduan Mountain

中图分类号:

Q958.1

宋文宇, 王洪娇, 李弈仙, 何水旺, 蒋学龙. 云南省两种兽类新纪录——藏鼩鼱(Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko,1905)和甘肃鼩鼱(Sorex cansulus Thomas,1912)[J]. 兽类学报, 2021, 41(3): 352-360.

SONG Wenyu, WANG Hongjiao, LI Yixian, HE Shuiwang, JIANG Xuelong. New records of Tibetan shrew(Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko,1905) and Gansu shrew(Sorex cansulus Thomas,1912) in Yunnan Province[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 41(3): 352-360.

参考文献

Bannikova A A,Chernetskaya D,Raspopova A,Alexandrov D,Fang Y,Dokuchaev N,Sheftel B,Lebedev V.2018.Evolutionary history of the genus Sorex(Soricidae,Eulipotyphla) as inferred from multigene data.Zoologica Scripta,47(5):518-538.
Chen S,Sun Z,He K,Jiang X,Liu Y,Koju N P,Zhang X,Tu F,Fan Z,Liu S,Yue B.2015.Molecular phylogenetics and phylogeographic structure of Sorex bedfordiae based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,84:245-253.
Chen Z Z,He K,Huang C,Wan T,Lin L K,Liu S Y,Jiang X L.2017.Integrative systematic analyses of the genus Chodsigoa(Mammalia:Eulipotyphla:Soricidae),with descriptions of new species.Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society,180(3):694-713.
Dolgov V,Hoffmann R.1977.Tibetskaya burozubka-Sorex thibetanus Kastchenko,1905(Soricidae Mammalia).Zoologicheskii Zhurnal,46:1687-1692.
Ellerman J R,Morrison-Scott T C S.1951.Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian mammals,1758 to 1946.London:British Museum.
Hoffmann R S.1987.A review of the systematics and distribution of Chinese red-toothed shrews(Mammalia:Soricinae).Acta Theriologica Sinica,7(2):100-139.
Hoffmann R S.2001.The southern boundary of the Palaearctic realm in china and adjacent countries.Current Zoology,47(2):121-131.
Hutterer R.1979.Verbreitung und Systematik von Sorex minutus Linnaeus,1766(Insectivora;Soricinae) im Nepal-Himalaya und 〖JP2〗angrenzenden Gebieten.Mammalian Biology-Zeitschrift für Sägetier-kunde,44:65-80.
Kastschenko N.1905.Obzor mlekopitayushchikh zapadnoi Sibiri i Turkestana.Izvestiya Tomskogo(Gosudarstvennogo) Universiteta,27:93.
Kimura M.1980.A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.Journal of Molecular Evolution,16(2):111-120.
Kumar S,Stecher G,Li M,Knyaz C,Tamura K.2018.MEGA X:Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms.Molecular Biology and Evolution,35(6):1547-1549.
Jiang Z G.2015.China's Mammal Diversity and Geographic Distribution.Beijing:Science Press.(in Chinese).
Pan Q H,Wang Y X,Yan K.2007. A Field Guide to the Mammals of China.Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House.(in Chinese).
Sheftel B I,Bannikova A A,Fang Y,Demidova T B,Alexandrov D Y,Lebedev V S,Sun Y H.2018.Notes on the fauna,systematics,and ecology of small mammals in southern Gansu,China.Biology Bulletin,45(8):898-912.
Smith A T,Xie Y.2009.A Guide to the Mammals of China.Changsha:Hunan Education Press.(in Chinese).
Thomas O.1912.LI.- On a collection of small mammals from the Tsin-ling Mountains,Central China,presented by Mr.G.Fenwick Owen to the National Museum.Annals and Magazine of Natural History,10:395-403.
Trifinopoulos J,Nguyen L T,von Haeseler A,Minh B Q.2016.W-IQ-TREE:a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis.Nucleic Acids Res,44(W1):W232-235.
Wilson D E,Mittermeier R A.2018.Handbook of the mammals of the world:vol.8:insectivores,sloths and colugos.Barcelona:Lynx Edicions.
Wilson D E,Reeder D M.2005.Mammal Species of the World.A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference(3rd ed).Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
Xie W H,Yang X F,Li J N,Tao S L,Xiao Z S.2014.A preliminary study of the biodiversity of ground-dwelling small mammals in Badagongshan National Nature Reserve,Hunan Province.Biodiversity Science,22(2):216-222.(in Chinese).
Yang Q S,Xia L,Feng Z J,Ma Y,Quan G Q,Wu Y.2007.A guide to the measurement of mammal skull V:Insectivora and Chiroptera.Chinese Journal of Zoology,42(2):56-62.(in Chinese).
Smith A T,解焱.2009.中国兽类野外手册.长沙:湖南教育出版社.
杨奇森,夏霖,冯祚建,马勇,全国强,吴毅.2007.兽类头骨测量标准Ⅴ:食虫目、翼手目.动物学杂志,42(2):56-62.
蒋志刚.2015.中国哺乳动物多样性及地理分布.北京:科学出版社.
谢文华,杨锡福,李俊年,陶双伦,肖治术.2014.八大公山自然保护区地栖性小兽多样性初步研究.生物多样性,22(2):216-222.
潘清华,王应祥,岩崑.2007.中国哺乳动物彩色图鉴.北京:中国林业出版社.

[1]	蔡振媛覃雯高红梅吴彤迟翔文杨俊东苗紫燕张婧捷宋鹏飞连新明苏建平张同作. 三江源国家公园兽类物种多样性及区系分析[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(4): 410-420.
[2]	胡茜茜李佳琦罗旭泽翁他许陈星张卢水官天培. 基于红外相机的四川亚丁国家级自然保护区鸟兽多样性初报[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(3): 333-343.
[3]	张海姬侯东敏梅丽谌立新王政昆朱万龙. 夏季横断山不同地区大绒鼠脏器和消化道形态的差异[J]. 兽类学报, 2018, 38(5): 499-503.
[4]	王政昆, 高文荣, 朱万龙. 横断山区三种小型哺乳动物代谢特征的研究进展[J]. 兽类学报, 2015, 35(4): 445-452.
[5]	胡一鸣姚志军黄志文田园李海滨普琼杨道德胡慧建. 西藏珠穆朗玛峰国家级自然保护区哺乳动物区系及其垂直变化[J]. , 2014, 34(1): 28-37.
[6]	孙治宇刘少英郭延蜀刘洋廖锐郭振伟. 二郎山小型兽类区系及分布格局[J]. , 2013, 33(1): 82-89.
[7]	涂飞云唐明坤刘洋孙治宇张修月岳碧松刘少英. 四川夹金山小型兽类区系及多样性[J]. , 2012, 32(4): 287-296.
[8]	刘少英　孙治宇　冉江洪　刘洋　符建荣蔡永寿　雷开明. 四川九寨沟自然保护区兽类调查[J]. , 2005, 25(3): 273-281.
[9]	侯兰新，余玉群，刘坪. 新疆伊犁地区兽类调查报告[J]. , 2000, 20(3): 233-238.
[10]	路纪琪，王廷正. 河南省啮齿动物区系与区划研究[J]. , 1996, 16(2): 119-128.
[11]	张显理, 于有志. 宁夏哺乳动物区系与地理区划研究[J]. , 1995, 15(2): 128-136.
[12]	秦长育. 宁夏啮齿动物区系及动物地理区划[J]. , 1991, 11(2): 143-151.
[13]	王廷正. 陕西省啮齿动物区系与区划[J]. , 1990, 10(2): 128-136.
[14]	郑涛, 张迎梅. 甘肃省啮齿动物区系及地理区划的研究[J]. , 1990, 10(2): 137-144.
[15]	陈延熹, 黄文几, 唐仕敏. 赣北冀手类区系调查[J]. , 1987, 7(1): 13-19.

云南省两种兽类新纪录——藏鼩鼱(Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko,1905)和甘肃鼩鼱(Sorex cansulus Thomas,1912)

New records of Tibetan shrew(Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko,1905) and Gansu shrew(Sorex cansulus Thomas,1912) in Yunnan Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics