兽类学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 349-361.DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150608
• 研究论文 • 下一篇
钱天陆1, 秦淑洁1, 吴朝宁1, 席唱白1, 王结臣1,2()
收稿日期:
2021-09-10
接受日期:
2022-03-14
出版日期:
2022-07-30
发布日期:
2022-07-22
通讯作者:
王结臣
作者简介:
钱天陆 (1993- ),女,博士研究生,主要从事动物地理和GIS研究.
基金资助:
Tianlu QIAN1, Shujie QIN1, Zhaoning WU1, Changbai XI1, Jiechen WANG1,2()
Received:
2021-09-10
Accepted:
2022-03-14
Online:
2022-07-30
Published:
2022-07-22
Contact:
Jiechen WANG
摘要:
滇金丝猴 (Rhinopithecus bieti) 是我国特有的濒危灵长类动物,预测其栖息地变化,评估人类活动影响,进而识别保护空缺,对该物种的保护具有重要意义。本文使用出行大数据估计人类出行密度,并将这一指标引入栖息地模型的构建;运用MaxEnt模型和空间分析技术分别构建自然环境和人类干扰两种情景下滇金丝猴的适宜栖息地模型,并分析自然环境与人类干扰两类共计11个变量对栖息地的影响。结果显示:(1) MaxEnt模型的预测精度较高,基于出行大数据的人类出行密度这一指标能很好表征人类干扰对栖息地的影响。(2) 模型预测得到滇金丝猴高适宜栖息地面积3 487.28 km2,认为影响滇金丝猴潜在分布的主要环境变量是海拔、年降水量、人类出行密度和距道路距离。(3) 人类干扰对滇金丝猴栖息地有明显的负影响 (使适宜栖息地面积相较于自然环境下减少9.32%),其中人类出行活动对滇金丝猴的栖息地干扰最为明显;同时还发现研究区78.8%的区域均受到一个或多个人类变量的较强干扰。(4) 在现有15个滇金丝猴群的活动斑块中,3个同时具有较高栖息地适宜性和较多人类干扰的斑块,可作为重点保护区域;同时发现栖息地质量在距道路和居民点约2 500 m处均出现明显拐点,可作为开展保护工作的缓冲区参考距离。降低这些区域的人类干扰强度,对滇金丝猴的生存具有更重要的现实保护意义。
中图分类号:
钱天陆, 秦淑洁, 吴朝宁, 席唱白, 王结臣. 基于MaxEnt模型的人类干扰对滇金丝猴潜在分布的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(4): 349-361.
Tianlu QIAN, Shujie QIN, Zhaoning WU, Changbai XI, Jiechen WANG. Impacts of human interference on the potential distribution of Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys by MaxEnt model[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(4): 349-361.
变量代码 Variable code | 环境变量 Environmental variable | 百分贡献率 Percentage contribution (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
情景1 Scenario 1 | 情景2 Scenario 2 | ||
altitude | 海拔 Altitude | 23.6 | 1.6 |
slope | 坡度 Slope | 12.1 | 6.3 |
aspect | 坡向 Aspect | 5.6 | 5.2 |
vegetation | 植被覆盖类型 Vegetation type | 5.7 | 4.0 |
d_river | 距河流距离 Distance to rivers | 2.2 | 0.8 |
temperature | 年平均气温 Annual mean temperature | 22.1 | 3.8 |
precipitation | 年降水量 Annual precipitation | 28.8 | 23.2 |
landuse | 土地利用类型 Land use type | ─ | 12.7 |
d_road | 距道路距离 Distance to roads | ─ | 5.6 |
d_residence | 距居民点距离 Distance to residences | ─ | 4.7 |
k_density | 人类出行密度 Human travel density | ─ | 32.1 |
表1 环境变量在情景1和2下对滇金丝猴潜在分布的百分贡献率
Table 1 The percentage contribution of environmental variables to the potential distribution of Yunnan Snub-nosed monkeys, in scenario 1 and 2
变量代码 Variable code | 环境变量 Environmental variable | 百分贡献率 Percentage contribution (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
情景1 Scenario 1 | 情景2 Scenario 2 | ||
altitude | 海拔 Altitude | 23.6 | 1.6 |
slope | 坡度 Slope | 12.1 | 6.3 |
aspect | 坡向 Aspect | 5.6 | 5.2 |
vegetation | 植被覆盖类型 Vegetation type | 5.7 | 4.0 |
d_river | 距河流距离 Distance to rivers | 2.2 | 0.8 |
temperature | 年平均气温 Annual mean temperature | 22.1 | 3.8 |
precipitation | 年降水量 Annual precipitation | 28.8 | 23.2 |
landuse | 土地利用类型 Land use type | ─ | 12.7 |
d_road | 距道路距离 Distance to roads | ─ | 5.6 |
d_residence | 距居民点距离 Distance to residences | ─ | 4.7 |
k_density | 人类出行密度 Human travel density | ─ | 32.1 |
图4 滇金丝猴环境变量在情景1 (a) 和情景2 (b) 下的刀切法检验结果
Fig. 4 The jackknife test result of environmental variable for Yunnan snub-nosed monkey in Scenario 1 (a) and Scenario 2 (b)
项目 Item | 不适宜栖息地 Unsuitable habitat | 低适宜栖息地 Low suitable habitat | 中适宜栖息地 Medium suitable habitat | 高适宜栖息地 High suitable habitat | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
情景1 Scenario 1 | 面积 Area(km2) | 12 844.50 | 9 602.93 | 8 409.03 | 3 568.24 |
面积占比 Proportion(%) | 37.31 | 27.90 | 24.43 | 10.36 | |
情景2 Scenario 2 | 面积 Area(km2) | 14 854.90 | 9 468.07 | 6 614.45 | 3 487.28 |
面积占比 Proportion(%) | 43.15 | 27.50 | 19.22 | 10.13 |
表2 滇金丝猴的栖息地适宜性面积统计
Table 2 The area of suitable habitat of Yunnan snub-nosed monkey
项目 Item | 不适宜栖息地 Unsuitable habitat | 低适宜栖息地 Low suitable habitat | 中适宜栖息地 Medium suitable habitat | 高适宜栖息地 High suitable habitat | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
情景1 Scenario 1 | 面积 Area(km2) | 12 844.50 | 9 602.93 | 8 409.03 | 3 568.24 |
面积占比 Proportion(%) | 37.31 | 27.90 | 24.43 | 10.36 | |
情景2 Scenario 2 | 面积 Area(km2) | 14 854.90 | 9 468.07 | 6 614.45 | 3 487.28 |
面积占比 Proportion(%) | 43.15 | 27.50 | 19.22 | 10.13 |
图7 人类干扰变量与滇金丝猴潜在栖息地存在概率的关系
Fig. 7 The relationship between the habitat presence probability of Yunnan snub-nosed monkey and human environment variables
图9 现有15个滇金丝猴群活动斑块的适宜栖息地分布 (a) 和受人类因素干扰强度 (b)
Fig.9 The suitability (a) and human interferences (b) for Yunnan snub-nosed monkey in 15 existing group parcels
编号 Habitat code | 栖息地适宜性* Habitat suitability | 人类干扰因素# Human interferences | 编号 Habitat code | 栖息地适宜性* Habitat suitability | 人类干扰因素# Human interferences | 编号 Habitat code | 栖息地适宜性* Habitat suitability | 人类干扰因素# Human interferences | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 2.37 | 1.03 | Q6 | 2.63 | 2.00 | Q11 | 1.96 | 1.34 | ||
Q2 | 1.84 | 0.77 | Q7 | 2.38 | 1.27 | Q12 | 2.57 | 1.42 | ||
Q3 | 2.06 | 0.47 | Q8 | 2.66 | 1.39 | Q13 | 1.48 | 1.60 | ||
Q4 | 1.86 | 1.04 | Q9 | 1.84 | 0.95 | Q14 | 2.70 | 1.31 | ||
Q5 | 2.07 | 1.22 | Q10 | 2.72 | 1.85 | Q15 | 2.76 | 1.64 |
表3 各猴群活动斑块栖息地适宜性和人类干扰因素的均值
Table 3 Mean value of habitat suitability and number of human interferences in each group parcels
编号 Habitat code | 栖息地适宜性* Habitat suitability | 人类干扰因素# Human interferences | 编号 Habitat code | 栖息地适宜性* Habitat suitability | 人类干扰因素# Human interferences | 编号 Habitat code | 栖息地适宜性* Habitat suitability | 人类干扰因素# Human interferences | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 2.37 | 1.03 | Q6 | 2.63 | 2.00 | Q11 | 1.96 | 1.34 | ||
Q2 | 1.84 | 0.77 | Q7 | 2.38 | 1.27 | Q12 | 2.57 | 1.42 | ||
Q3 | 2.06 | 0.47 | Q8 | 2.66 | 1.39 | Q13 | 1.48 | 1.60 | ||
Q4 | 1.86 | 1.04 | Q9 | 1.84 | 0.95 | Q14 | 2.70 | 1.31 | ||
Q5 | 2.07 | 1.22 | Q10 | 2.72 | 1.85 | Q15 | 2.76 | 1.64 |
Afonso E, Fu R, Dupaix A, Goydadin A C, Li L. 2021. Creating small, food‑habituated groups might alter genetic diversity in the endangered Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26: e01422. | |
Bai S C, Zou S Q, Lin S, Tuo D, Wang X H, Zhong T. 1987. A preliminary observation on migration habit of Rhinopithecus bieti . Sichuan Journal of Zoology, (1): 45-47. (in Chinese) | |
Chen Y M, Liu X P, Li X, Liu X J, Yao Y, Hu G H, Xu X C, Pei F S. 2017. Delineating urban functional areas with building-level social media data: A dynamic time warping (DTW) distance based k-medoids method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 160: 48-60. | |
Cord A F, Klein D, Mora F, Dech S. 2014. Comparing the suitability of classified land cover data and remote sensing variables for modeling distribution patterns of plants. Ecological Modelling, 272: 129-140. | |
Dai Y C, Li L, Wu G S, Zhou Y, Li W W. 2016. Analysis on landscape patterns of current distribution of Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti)-Based on the data of global land 30. Resource Development & Market, 32 (1): 37-40. (in Chinese) | |
Fang Y, Zhang X X, Guo C Q. 2020. Habitat suitability of black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) in Zoige wetland. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 39 (9): 3021-3031. (in Chinese) | |
Gong M H, Fan Z Y, Zhang X M, Liu G, Wen W Y, Zhang L. 2017. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area management by comparing habitat utilization and threat dynamics. Biological Conservation, 210 (A): 253-260. | |
Hanley J A, Mcneil B J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143 (1): 29. | |
Huang P Z, Bian K, Huang Z P, Li Q, Dunn D W, Fang G, Liu J H, Wang M Y, Yang X F, Pan R L, Gao C L, Si K C, Li B G, Qi X G. 2021. Human activities and elevational constraints restrict ranging patterns of snub‑nosed monkeys in a mountainous refuge. Integrative Zoology, 16 (2): 202-213. | |
Jiang Z G, Ma K P. 2009. Status quo, challenges and strategy in conservation biology. Biodiversity Science, 17 (2): 107-116. (in Chinese) | |
Li C. 2020. Impact of landscape pattern on movement of Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti) and the habitat evaluation.Master thesis. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. (in Chinese) | |
Li D Y, Ren B P, Grueter C C, Zhou Q H, Peng Z S, Wei F W, Li B G. 2009. Seasonal selection of sleeping sites in Yunnan snub‑nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) at Gehuaqing in Baimaxueshan Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 29 (4): 389-395. (in Chinese) | |
Li D Y, Grueter C C, Ren B P, Long Y L, Li M, Peng Z S, Wei F W. 2008. Ranging of Rhinopithecus bieti in the Samage Forest, China. II. use of land cover types and altitudes. International Journal of Primatology, 29 (5): 1147-1173. | |
Li H Q, Lian Z M. 2007. A survey of resources and protection of snub‑nosed golden monkey (Rhinopithecus) in China. Journal of Yan’an University (Natural Science Edition), 26 (1): 65-68, 71. (in Chinese) | |
Li H, Li L, Wu G S, Zhou Y, Li W W, Mei Z W. 2018. Analysis of the landscape-level connectivity of the Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey habitat based on circuit theory. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38 (6): 2221-2228. (in Chinese) | |
Li M L, Chen Q Q, Han L, Wang P, Yang J W, Wang M Y, Yang W K. 2020. Habitat suitability assessment of Marco Polo sheep in Taxkorgan Nature Reserve in Xinjiang. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40 (11): 3549-3559. (in Chinese) | |
Li S C, Wu J S, Jian G, Li S W. 2018. Human footprint in Tibet: Assessing the spatial layout and effectiveness of nature reserves. Science of the Total Environment, 621 (APR.15): 18-29. | |
Liu S L, Liu L M, Wu X, Hou X Y, Zhao S, Liu G H. 2018. Quantitative evaluation of human activity intensity on the regional ecological impact studies. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38 (19): 6797-6809. (in Chinese) | |
Liu Z S, Gao H, Teng L W, Su Y, Wang X Q, Kong F Y. 2013. Habitat suitability assessment of blue sheep in Helan Mountain based on MAXENT modeling. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33 (22): 7243-7249. (in Chinese) | |
Luo M, Wang H, Lyu Z. 2017. Evaluating the performance of species distribution models Biomod2 and MaxEnt using the giant panda distribution data. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28 (12): 4001-4006. (in Chinese) | |
Phillips S J, Dudík M, Schapire R E. 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning. Banff, Alberta, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery. | |
Qi Z X, Xu W H, Xiong X Y, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, Gan D X. 2011. Assessment of potential habitat for Ursus thibetanus in the Qinling Mountains. Biodiversity Science, 19 (3): 343-352, 398. (in Chinese) | |
Qian T L, Chi Y, Xi C B, Li Z Q, Wang J C. 2020. Changes in the historical and current habitat ranges of rare wild mammals in China: A case study of six taxa of small‑ to large‑sized mammals. Sustainability, 12 (7): 2744. | |
Qing Z L, Wei D, Yan Z C, Hui D Y, Jun W J. 2020. Influence of visual proportion of urban street cultural landscape on Crowd Aggregation-an empirical study on street space in downtown Chengdu. Urban and Regional Planning, 5 (3): 77. | |
Radeloff V C, Stewart S I, Hawbaker T J, Gimmi U, Pidgeon A M, Flather C H, Hammer R B, Helmers D P. 2010. Housing growth in and near united states protected areas limits their conservation value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (2): 940-945. | |
Saatchi S, Buermann W, Steege H T, Mori S, Smith T B. 2008. Modeling distribution of Amazonian tree species and diversity using remote sensing measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (5): 2000-2017. | |
Wang L C, Liu H Y, Liu Q. 2021. China’s city network based on Tencent’s migration big data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 76 (4): 853-869. (in Chinese) | |
Wei Z Q, Xu Z R. 2020. Habitat distribution of Tibetan antelope in the Chang Tang Plateau and influential factors. Acta Ecological Sinica, 40 (23): 8763-8772. (in Chinese) | |
Wong M H G, Li R Q, Xu M, Long Y C. 2013. An integrative approach to assessing the potential impacts of climate change on the Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey. Biological Conservation, 158 (1): 401-409. | |
Wu J G, Lv J J. 2009. Potential effects of climate change on the distributions of Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey (Pygathrix bieti) in China. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 25 (6): 1-10. (in Chinese) | |
Wu Z J, Li Y M. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on survival of animal populations. Acta Ecological Sinica, 23 (11): 2424-2435. (in Chinese) | |
Xi C B, Chi Y, Qian T L, Zhang W H, Wang J C. 2020. Simulation of human activity intensity and its influence on mammal diversity in Sanjiangyuan National Park, China. Sustainability, 12 (11): 4601. | |
Xin L. 2020. Study on the influence of the social economy on ecological quality in the distribution area of Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey. Yunnan University of Finance and Economics. (in Chinese) | |
Xu W B, Svenning J C, Chen G K, Zhang M G, Huang J H, Chen B, Ordonez A, Ma K P. 2019. Human activities have opposing effects on distributions of narrow‑ranged and widespread plant species in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (52): 26674-26681. | |
Zhang T, Huang Z H, Peng Y J, Wang Y T, Wang P, Wang S T, Cui G F. 2020. Prediction of potential suitable areas of Actinidia arguta in China based on Maxent model. Acta Ecological Sinica, 40 (14): 4921-4928. (in Chinese) | |
Zhao X M, Ren B P, Li D Y, Garber P A, Zhu P F, Xiang Z F, Grueter C C, Liu Z J, Li M. 2019. Climate change, grazing, and collecting accelerate habitat contraction in an endangered primate. Biological Conservation, 231: 88-97. | |
Zhou R L, Du Y, Yang Q X, Ding K. 2008. Spatial analysis of the habitat patterns for Rhinopithecus bieti . Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 20 (3): 1-6, 125-126. (in Chinese) | |
Zhu G P, Liu G Q, Bu W J, Gao Y B. 2013. Ecological niche modeling and its applications in biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity Science, 21 (1): 90-98. (in Chinese) | |
Zhu S X, Li L, Xing L, Wu G S, Guo H Y, Wang X, Bao G J. 2022. Impact of the villages on habitat quality of Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey in northwest Yunnan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42 (3): 1213-1223. (in Chinese) | |
王录仓, 刘海洋, 刘清. 2021. 基于腾讯迁徙大数据的中国城市网络研究. 地理学报, 76 (4): 853-869. | |
方宇, 张学霞, 郭长庆. 2020. 若尔盖湿地黑颈鹤生境适宜性. 生态学杂志, 39 (9): 3021-3031. | |
白寿昌, 邹淑荃, 林苏, 拖丁, 王小红, 忠态. 1987. 滇金丝猴迁移习性的初步观察. 四川动物, (1): 45-47. | |
代云川, 李丽, 吴巩胜, 周跃, 李雯雯. 2016. 滇金丝猴分布区景观格局现状分析——基于全球30 m地表覆盖数据. 资源开发与市场, 32 (1): 37-40. | |
朱耿平, 刘国卿, 卜文俊, 高玉葆. 2013. 生态位模型的基本原理及其在生物多样性保护中的应用. 生物多样性, 21 (1): 90-98. | |
朱淑娴, 李丽, 邢璐, 吴巩胜, 国洪艳, 王翔, 包广静. 2022. 滇西北地区自然村对滇金丝猴生境质量的影响. 生态学报, 42 (3): 1213-1223. | |
邢璐. 2020. 滇金丝猴分布区的社会经济对生态质量的影响研究. 昆明: 云南财经大学硕士学位论文. | |
齐增湘, 徐卫华, 熊兴耀, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 甘德欣. 2011. 基于MAXENT模型的秦岭山系黑熊潜在生境评价. 生物多样性, 19(3): 343-352, 398. | |
刘世梁, 刘芦萌, 武雪, 侯笑云, 赵爽, 刘国华. 2018. 区域生态效应研究中人类活动强度定量化评价. 生态学报, 38 (19): 6797-6809. | |
刘振生, 高惠, 滕丽微, 苏云, 王晓勤, 孔芳毅. 2013. 基于MAXENT模型的贺兰山岩羊生境适宜性评价. 生态学报, 33 (22): 7243-7249. | |
吴建国, 吕佳佳. 2009. 气候变化对滇金丝猴分布的潜在影响. 气象与环境学报, 25 (6): 1-10. | |
邹淑荃, 白寿昌. 1990. 滇金丝猴——世界珍稀灵长类动物. 动物学杂志, 25 (1): 35-37. | |
李宏群, 廉振民. 2007. 中国的金丝猴资源现状及其保护. 延安大学学报: 自然科学版, 26 (1): 65-68,71. | |
李美玲, 陈强强, 韩雷, 王鹏, 杨建伟, 汪沐阳, 杨维康. 2020. 新疆塔什库尔干野生动物自然保护区马可波罗盘羊生境适宜性评价. 生态学报, 40 (11): 3549-3559. | |
李慧, 李丽, 吴巩胜, 周跃, 李雯雯, 梅泽文. 2018. 基于电路理论的滇金丝猴生境景观连通性分析. 生态学报, 38 (6): 2221-2228. | |
李聪. 2020. 景观格局对滇金丝猴运动策略的影响及栖息地适宜性评估. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文. | |
张童, 黄治昊, 彭杨靖, 王泳腾, 王萍, 王诗童, 崔国发. 2020. 基于Maxent模型的软枣猕猴桃在中国潜在适生区预测. 生态学报, 40 (14): 4921-4928. | |
周汝良, 杜勇, 杨庆仙, 丁琨. 2008. 滇金丝猴栖息地的空间格局分析. 云南地理环境研究, 20 (3): 1-6, 125-126. | |
武正军, 李义明. 2003. 生境破碎化对动物种群存活的影响. 生态学报, 23 (11): 2424-2435. | |
罗玫, 王昊, 吕植. 2017. 使用大熊猫数据评估Biomod2和MaxEnt分布预测模型的表现. 应用生态学报, 28 (12): 4001-4006. | |
蒋志刚, 马克平. 2009. 保护生物学的现状,挑战和对策. 生物多样性, 17 (2): 107-116. | |
黎大勇, 任宝平, Grueter C C, 周岐海, 彭正松, 魏辅文, 李保国. 2009. 白马雪山自然保护区格花箐滇金丝猴夜宿地的季节性选择. 兽类学报, 29 (4): 389-395. | |
魏子谦, 徐增让. 2020. 羌塘高原藏羚羊栖息地分布及影响因素. 生态学报, 40 (23): 8763-8772. |
[1] | 任宝平, 吴瑞东, 黎大勇, Paul A. Garber, 李明. 滇金丝猴夜宿树的选择及夜宿地的利用方式[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(1): 37-49. |
[2] | 蒙秉顺, 黄小龙, 谢波, 王维熙, 黄继池, 张涛, 冉景丞, 张明明. 贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区有蹄类动物适宜栖息地分布[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(6): 664-675. |
[3] | 邹书珍, 罗亚, 程鸣, 王凡, 黎大勇, 康迪, 唐贇. 滇金丝猴肠道微生物四环素抗性基因和肠道环境特征[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(3): 304-314. |
[4] | 戎战磊, 高雅月, 陈生云, 张同作. 祁连山国家公园青海片区雪豹栖息地适宜性评价[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(5): 553-562. |
[5] | 李兴康, 钟旭凯, 韦绍干, 崔亮伟, 范朋飞, 管振华, 马长勇. 群体大小和觅食环境变化对东黑冠长臂猿日移动距离的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2021, 41(4): 388-397. |
[6] | 李欣蕊, 赵序茅, 李明. 气候变化和人为干扰对中国三种金丝猴地理分布的未来影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2021, 41(3): 310-320. |
[7] | 吴曼菲, 胡湛波, 周岐海, 吴坚宝. 基于MaxEnt模式的白头叶猴栖息地评价——以广西崇左白头叶猴保护区为例[J]. 兽类学报, 2021, 41(1): 20-31. |
[8] | 朱世兵, 曲艺, Yachmennikova Anna, Kotlov Ivan, Sandlerskiy Robert, Rozhnov Viatcheslav, Hernandez-Blanco Jose Antonio, 张士芳, 刘应竹, 张弘强. 基于MaxEnt模型的小兴安岭东北虎潜在生境适宜性评价[J]. 兽类学报, 2020, 40(4): 317-328. |
[9] | 迟翔文 江峰 高红梅 覃雯 吴彤 张婧捷 蔡振媛 张同作. 三江源国家公园雪豹和岩羊生境适宜性分析[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(4): 397-409. |
[10] | 夏万才 胡杰 任宝平 和鑫明 旷培刚 钟泰 黎大勇. 人工辅助投食滇金丝猴一雄多雌单元之间的等级序列[J]. 兽类学报, 2017, 37(4): 371-378. |
[11] | 夏凡 朱平芬 李明 任宝平. 白马雪山自然保护区响古箐滇金丝猴(Rhinopithecus bieti)的交配行为[J]. 兽类学报, 2016, 36(1): 1-14. |
[12] | 袁晓霞 黎大勇 任宝平 李艳红 马永红 张德军 胡杰. 滇金丝猴0 - 3 岁个体的社会玩耍行为[J]. 兽类学报, 2014, 34(2): 115-121. |
[13] | 张德军 黎大勇 胡杰 任宝平 袁晓霞 和鑫明 李艳红 李明. 滇金丝猴雌性个体间的理毛行为[J]. , 2014, 34(1): 38-45. |
[14] | 黎大勇 任宝平 胡杰 和鑫明 李保国 李明. 白马雪山自然保护区响古箐滇金丝猴活动时间分配[J]. , 2013, 33(3): 223-231. |
[15] | 向左甫, 肖文, 霍晟. 西藏红拉雪山滇金丝猴的夜宿地与夜宿树选择[J]. 兽类学报, 2011, 31(4): 330-337. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||