贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区有蹄类动物适宜栖息地分布

doi:10.16829/j.slxb.150756

兽类学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 664-675.DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150756

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区有蹄类动物适宜栖息地分布

蒙秉顺^1,2, 黄小龙^2,4, 谢波¹, 王维熙¹, 黄继池¹, 张涛³, 冉景丞^2,4, 张明明¹

1 贵州大学林学院, 贵州大学生物多样性与自然保护研究中心, 贵阳 550025;
2 贵州省林业科学研究院, 贵阳 550005;
3 贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区管理局, 江口 554400;
4 贵州梵净山森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 江口 554400

收稿日期:2022-11-21 修回日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-11-22
通讯作者: 张明明, E-mail:mmzhang@gzu.edu.cn
作者简介:蒙秉顺(1998-)，男，硕士，主要从事野生动物研究.
基金资助:
贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合支撑〔2019〕2842号)；贵州省林业科研项目(黔林科合J字〔2022〕10号)；国家自然科学基金(32260331)；黔科合平台人才〔2018〕5781-39号；生态环境部典型生态系统的生物多样性观测与评估项目(2018-02-06-M2019-48)

Distribution of suitable habitat for ungulates in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province

MENG Bingshun^1,2, HUANG Xiaolong^2,4, XIE Bo¹, WANG Weixi¹, HUANG Jichi¹, ZHANG Tao³, RAN Jingcheng^2,4, ZHANG Mingming¹

1 College of Forestry, Guizhou University Research Center for Biodiversity and Nature Conservation of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2 Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China;
3 Guizhou Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve Administration, Jiangkou 554400, China;
4 Guizhou Fanjingshan Forest Ecosystem National Positioning Observation and Research Station, Jiangkou 554400, China

Received:2022-11-21 Revised:2023-06-20 Published:2023-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 物种的空间分布与栖息地适宜性是开展种间关系、物种与环境关系等研究的重要基础。本研究基于2017—2022年在梵净山国家级自然保护区开展的红外相机监测和调查数据，使用MaxEnt模型对毛冠鹿(Elaphodus cephalophus)、小麂(Muntiacus reevesi)、中华鬣羚(Capricornis milneedwardsii)和野猪(Sus scrofa)的适宜栖息地进行评估和预测，以期深入了解梵净山保护区有蹄类动物栖息地适宜性特征及影响因素。结果表明：(1)毛冠鹿的适宜栖息地面积为19 993.17 hm²，占保护区面积的46.1%，主要分布于梵净山保护区的东部；小麂的适宜栖息地面积为15 470.97 hm²，占保护区面积的35.6%，主要分布于梵净山保护区的北部和南部；中华鬣羚的适宜栖息地面积为13 884.78 hm²，占保护区面积的32.0%，主要分布于梵净山保护区的北部和东部；野猪的适宜栖息地面积为20 339.98 hm²，占保护区面积的46.9%，主要分布于梵净山保护区的北部、东部和南部。(2)4种有蹄类动物的适宜栖息地均主要分布于保护区核心区。(3)毛冠鹿的分布主要受海拔和植被类型的影响；中华鬣羚的分布主要受海拔、平均气温日较差和植被类型的影响；小麂和野猪的分布主要受平均气温日较差、等温性和坡度的影响，两者的适宜栖息地特征也更为相似。总之，梵净山保护区有蹄类动物的适宜栖息地分布是物种自身特性与自然环境、人类活动以及种间关系相互作用的结果。

关键词: 适宜栖息地, MaxEnt模型, 有蹄类动物, 梵净山国家级自然保护区

Abstract: The spatial distribution of species and habitat suitability play an important role in the research on interspecific relationships, as well as research on relationships between species and environment. We evaluated and predicted the suitable habitats of four ungulates, Elaphodus cephalophus, Muntiacus reevesi, Pricornis milneedwardsii and Sus scrofa, distributed in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve. Species occurrence data was based on the monitoring data by infrared cameras deployed in the study area from 2017 to 2022 and we used MaxEnt to model the suitable habitat for each species. The results showed that (1) the suitable habitats for Elaphodus cephalophus were mainly distributed in the eastern part of the reserve, covering an area of 19 993.17 hm², accounting for 46.1% of the protected area. The suitable habitats for Muntiacus reevesi covered an area of 15 470.97 hm² ( 35.6% of the protected area), distributed in the northern and southern parts of the reserve. The suitable habitats for Capricornis milneedwardsii were mainly distributed in the northern and eastern parts of the reserve, covering an area of 13 884.78 hm² (32.0% of the protected area), and the suitable habitats for Sus scrofa covered an area of 20 339.98 hm² (46.9% of the protected area), mainly distributed in the northern, eastern and southern parts of the reserve. (2) The suitable habitats of all four ungulates were mainly distributed in the core area of Fanjingshan Reserve. (3) The distribution of Elaphodus cephalophus was mainly influenced by altitude and vegetation type and the distribution of Capricornis milneedwardsii was mainly influenced by altitude, mean diurnal air temperature range and vegetation type. The characteristics of suitable habitats for Muntiacus reevesi and Sus scrofa were relatively similar, affected by mean diurnal air temperature range, isothermality and slope. In general, the distribution of suitable habitats for these four ungulates in Fanjingshan Reserve was the result of the interaction among the biological properties of species, natural environment, human activities and interspecific relationships. These results provide some insight into habitat suitability characteristics and influencing factors of ungulates in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve.

Key words: Suitable habitat, MaxEnt, Ungulates, Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve

中图分类号:

Q958.12

蒙秉顺, 黄小龙, 谢波, 王维熙, 黄继池, 张涛, 冉景丞, 张明明. 贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区有蹄类动物适宜栖息地分布[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(6): 664-675.

MENG Bingshun, HUANG Xiaolong, XIE Bo, WANG Weixi, HUANG Jichi, ZHANG Tao, RAN Jingcheng, ZHANG Mingming. Distribution of suitable habitat for ungulates in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(6): 664-675.

参考文献

Araújo M B, Peterson A T. 2012. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology, 93 (7): 1527-1539.
Ballari S A, Barios-Garcia M N. 2014. A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal Review, 44 (2): 124-134.
Berger J. 2007. Fear human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas. Biology Letters, 3 (6): 620-623.
Bergström R, Skarpe C. 2015. The abundance of large wild herbivores in a semi‐arid savanna in relation to seasons, pans and livestock. African Journal of Ecology, 37 (1): 12-26.
Block W M, Brennan L A. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology. theory and applications. In: Power D M ed. Current Ornithology. Boston: Springer, 35-91.
Feng B, Hu L, Zhao S S, Dong X, Feng W J, Zhang D Y, Zhang J D, Zhou C Q, Bai W K. 2022. Spatio-temporal niche characteristics of sympatric Chinese serow and Chinese goral. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42 (13): 5275-5284. (in Chinese)
Hu J, Xie P G, Li T T, Guo R, Xu L J, Song X, Xu A C. 2022. Temporal and spatial niche differentiation of sympatric black muntjac and Reeves’muntjac. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 42 (6): 641-651. (in Chinese)
Halle S, Stenseth N C. 2000. Ecological Relevance of Daily Activity Patterns: Activity Patterns in Small Mammals. Berlin: Springer, 67-90.
Hardin G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science, 131(3409): 1292-1297.
Jetz W, Thomas G H, Joy J B, Hartmann K, Mooers A O. 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature, 491 (7424):444-448.
Kikkawa J. 1986. Community Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Liscic D, Drakulic S, Herrel A, Dikic D, Benkovic V, Tadic Z. 2012. Effect of competition on habitat utilization in two temperate climate gecko species. Ecological Research, 27 (3): 551-560.
Li S, Zhang X F, Chen P, Wang J, Xiang D Q, Dong W, Zhang X M, He B S, Sun R Q, Zhao N X, Wang D J. 2014. The community structure and evelvational patterns of forest ungulates at the southern slope of the Qinling Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 49 (5): 633-643. (in Chinese)
Li S H, Wang J L, Chen Y. 2007. A primary study on habitat selection of Gaoligong Mountain takin. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 26(1): 51-56. (in Chinese)
Li X Y, Zhang W Y, Liu F, Zhang Z M, He T B, Lin C L. 2016. The distribution characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus at different altitudes in Fanjingshan Mountain. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 23 (3): 19-24. (in Chinese)
Luo R. 1993. The Mammalian Fauna of Guizhou. Guiyang: Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House, 378-381. (in Chinese)
Liu H, Li L, Ma Q, Wan D M, Zhang S Q, Zhu Y P. 2011. Review on wild boar research. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 30 (2): 310-314. (in Chinese)
Manandhar R, Odeh I O A, Ancev T. 2009. Improving the accuracy of land use and land cover classification of landsat data using postclassification enhancement. Remote Sensing, 1 (3): 330-344.
Merkle J A, Stahler D R, Smith D W. 2009. Interference competition between gray wolves and coyotes in Yellowstone National Park. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 87 (1): 56-63.
Pearce J L, Boyce M S. 2006. Modelling distribution and abun-dance with presence-only data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43:405-412.
Phillips S J, Anderson R P, Schapire R E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190: 231-259.
Pulliam H R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters, 3: 349-361.
Rong Z L, Gao Y Y, Chen S Y, Zhang T Z. 2022. Habitat suitability evaluation of snow leopard (Panthera uncia) in the Qilian Mountain National Park (Qinghai area), China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 42 (5): 553-562. (in Chinese)
Sand S J. 2016. Spatial and temporal distributions and interactions in a neotropical ground-dwelling animal community. Master thesis. Trondheim: Norwegian University.
Schoener T, Losos J B, Spiller D A. 2006. Island biogeography of populations: an introduced species transforms survival patterns. Science, 310 (2755): 1807-1809.
Schoener T W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185 (4145): 27-39.
Tucker M A, Böhninggaese K, Fagan W F, Fryxell J M, Van Moorter B, Alberts S C. 2018. Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science, 359 (6374):466-469.
Wang Y, Tian G S. 2018. Research on the wildlife germplasm resources value under the ecological security. Forestry Economics, 40 (3): 93-98. (in Chinese)
Wilson J W, Sexton J O, Jobe R T, Haddad N M. 2013. The relative contribution of terrain, land cover, and vegetation structure indices to species distribution models. Biological Conservation, 164:170-176.
Wu B, Zhu C Q, Li D Q, Dong K, Wang X L, Shi P L. 2006. Setting biodiversity conservation priorities in the forests of the upper yangtze ecoregion based on ecoregion conservation methodology. Biodiversity Science, 14 (2): 87-97. (in Chinese)
Xi B, Wang C, Fan H, Hu C S, Li H B, Li J Q, Su H J, Zhang M M. 2022. Activity rhythm analysis of sympatric Elaphodus cephalophus and Muntiacus reevesi based on camera-traps in the Fanjingshan Mountains. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 41 (2): 175-183.(in Chinese)
Yang H L. 2008. Habitat analysis for the gray snub-nosed monkey in Guizhou Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve. Master thesis. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry. (in Chinese)
Yang H L, Li D Q, Duo H R, Ma J. 2010. Vegetation distribution in Fanjing Mountain National Nature Reserve and habitat selection of Guizhou golden monkey. Forst Research, 23 (3): 393-398. (in Chinese)
Zhang C, Ma W, Chen C, Wang M Y, Xu W X, Yang W K. 2022. Changes of habitat pattern for goitered gazelle in the Xinjiang Kalamaili Mountain Ungulate Nature Reserve under the influence of major projects. Biodiversity Science, 30 (1): 63-75. (in Chinese)
Zhang M M, Yang Z H, Wang C, Wang J J, Hu C S, Lei X P, Shi L, Su H J, Li J Q. 2019. Camera-trapping survey on mammals and birds in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China. Biodiversity Science, 27 (7): 813-818. (in Chinese)
Zhou Z F, Qin Q C, Xie Z M, Liu M M, Peng J J. 2006. Distribution of the forest vegetation of Fanjingshan Mountain Natural Reserves based on 3S technology. Geomatics and Spatial Information Technology, 3: 4-6. (in Chinese)
王乙, 田国双. 2018. 生态安全视域下野生动物种质资源价值研究. 林业经济, 40 (3): 93-98.
冯彬, 胡露, 赵姗姗, 董鑫, 冯万举, 张栋耀, 张晋东, 周材权, 白文科. 2022. 同域分布中华鬣羚与中华斑羚时空生态位特征. 生态学报, 42 (13): 5275-5284.
戎战磊, 高雅月, 陈生云, 张同作. 2022. 祁连山国家公园青海片区雪豹栖息地适宜性评价. 兽类学报, 42 (5): 553-562.
刘鹤, 李乐, 马强, 万冬梅, 张树清, 祝业平. 2011. 野猪研究进展. 四川动物, 30 (2): 310-314.
李石华, 王金亮, 陈姚. 2007. 高黎贡山羚牛生境选择初步研究. 四川动物, 26 (1): 51-56.
李相楹, 张维勇, 刘峰, 张珍明, 何腾兵, 林昌卢. 2016. 不同海拔高度下梵净山土壤碳、氮、磷分布特征. 水土保持研究, 23 (3):19-24.
李晟, 张晓峰, 陈鹏, 王军, 向定乾, 董伟, 张希明, 何百锁, 孙瑞谦, 赵纳勋, 王大军. 2014. 秦岭南坡森林有蹄类群落组成与垂直分布特征. 动物学杂志, 49 (5): 633-643.
杨海龙, 李迪强, 朵海瑞, 马剑. 2010. 梵净山国家级自然保护区植被分布与黔金丝猴生境选择. 林业科学研究, 23 (3): 393-398.
杨海龙. 2008. 贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区黔金丝猴生境分析. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院硕士学位论文.
吴波, 朱春全, 李迪强, 董珂, 王秀磊, 石培礼. 2006. 长江上游森林生态区生物多样性保护优先区确定: 基于生态区保护方法. 生物多样性, 14 (2): 87-97.
张明明, 杨朝辉, 王丞, 王娇娇, 胡灿实, 雷孝平, 石磊, 粟海军, 李佳琦. 2019. 贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区鸟兽红外相机监测. 生物多样性, 27 (7): 813-818.
张晨, 马伟, 陈晨, 汪沐阳, 徐文轩, 杨维康. 2022. 重大工程影响下新疆卡拉麦里山有蹄类野生动物自然保护区鹅喉羚的生境格局变化. 生物多样性, 30 (1): 63-75.
国家林业和草原局, 农业农村部. 2021. 《国家重点保护野生动物名录》 (2021 年 2 月 1 日修订). 野生动物学报, 42 (2): 605-640.
罗蓉. 1993. 贵州兽类志. 贵阳: 贵州科技出版社, 378-381.
周忠发, 秦青春, 谢湛明, 刘曼曼, 彭晶晶. 2006. 基于“3S”的梵净山自然保护区植被分布探讨. 测绘与空间地理信息, 3: 4-6.
胡娟, 谢培根, 李婷婷, 郭瑞, 许丽娟, 宋虓, 徐爱春. 2022. 同域分布的黑麂和小麂的时空生态位分化. 兽类学报, 42 (6): 641-651.
谢波, 王丞, 樊涵, 胡灿实, 李海波, 李佳琦, 粟海军, 张明明. 2022. 基于红外相机监测的梵净山同域分布毛冠鹿和小麂活动节律研究. 四川动物, 41 (2): 175-183.

[1]	戎战磊, 高雅月, 陈生云, 张同作. 祁连山国家公园青海片区雪豹栖息地适宜性评价[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(5): 553-562.
[2]	钱天陆, 秦淑洁, 吴朝宁, 席唱白, 王结臣. 基于MaxEnt模型的人类干扰对滇金丝猴潜在分布的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(4): 349-361.
[3]	李欣蕊, 赵序茅, 李明. 气候变化和人为干扰对中国三种金丝猴地理分布的未来影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2021, 41(3): 310-320.
[4]	马兵, 潘国梁, 李雷光, 陈颖, 李祎斌, 刘一正, 巴力克·杰克义, 孙世为, 时坤. 天山中部雪豹栖息地适宜性研究初报[J]. 兽类学报, 2021, 41(1): 1-10.
[5]	吴曼菲, 胡湛波, 周岐海, 吴坚宝. 基于MaxEnt模式的白头叶猴栖息地评价——以广西崇左白头叶猴保护区为例[J]. 兽类学报, 2021, 41(1): 20-31.
[6]	朱世兵, 曲艺, Yachmennikova Anna, Kotlov Ivan, Sandlerskiy Robert, Rozhnov Viatcheslav, Hernandez-Blanco Jose Antonio, 张士芳, 刘应竹, 张弘强. 基于MaxEnt模型的小兴安岭东北虎潜在生境适宜性评价[J]. 兽类学报, 2020, 40(4): 317-328.
[7]	王乐冯佳伟 Amarsaikhan Tseveen 杨丽萌黄春明李栋朱新亮冯利民王天明葛剑平牟溥. 森林放牧对东北虎豹国家公园东部有蹄类动物灌草层食物资源的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(4): 386-396.
[8]	迟翔文江峰高红梅覃雯吴彤张婧捷蔡振媛张同作. 三江源国家公园雪豹和岩羊生境适宜性分析[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(4): 397-409.
[9]	郭艳清周俊宋先华邓怀庆邱阳石磊周江. 贵州省梵净山自然保护区黔金丝猴的种群数量[J]. 兽类学报, 2017, 37(1): 104-108.
[10]	郑生武, 余玉群, 韩亦平 , 吴家炎. 甘肃盐池湾白唇鹿自然保护区有蹄类动物群落结构的初步观察[J]. , 1989, 9(2): 130-136.

贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区有蹄类动物适宜栖息地分布

Distribution of suitable habitat for ungulates in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics