ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 442-450.DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150642
• REVIEWS • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shigang GU1,2, Yanhui ZHAI2, Chao XU1,3, Dawei YU4, Zhiqiang HAN4, Quanmin ZHAO1(), Xiangpeng DAI2()
Received:
2021-11-22
Accepted:
2022-02-03
Online:
2022-07-30
Published:
2022-07-22
Contact:
Quanmin ZHAO,Xiangpeng DAI
顾士钢1,2, 翟岩辉2, 徐超1,3, 余大为4, 韩志强4, 赵全民1(), 代相鹏2()
通讯作者:
赵全民,代相鹏
作者简介:
顾士钢 (1995- ),男,硕士研究生,主要从事野生动物保护与利用研究.
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shigang GU, Yanhui ZHAI, Chao XU, Dawei YU, Zhiqiang HAN, Quanmin ZHAO, Xiangpeng DAI. Research progress of interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer in wild animals[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(4): 442-450.
顾士钢, 翟岩辉, 徐超, 余大为, 韩志强, 赵全民, 代相鹏. 野生动物种间体细胞核移植研究进展[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(4): 442-450.
辅助生殖技术 Assisted reproductive technology | 首次应用 First application | 后续发展 Follow up development |
---|---|---|
体外受精 In vitro fertilization | 1890年兔 In 1890, rabbit | 1949年绵羊、山羊 In 1949, sheep, goat 1951年猪、牛 In 1951, pig, cattle 1974年牛 In 1974,cattle |
人工授精 Artificial insemination | 1780年犬 In 1780, dog | 1912年马、牛和羊 In 1912, horse, cattle and sheep 1952年牛 In 1952, cattle 1961年猪 In 1961, pig |
体外胚胎生产 In vitro embryo production | 1987年牛 In 1987, cattle | 1991年水牛 In 1991, buffalo 2000年猪 In 2000, pig 2003年马 In 2003, horse |
体细胞核移植 Somatic cell nuclear transfer | 1997年绵羊 In 1997, sheep | 1998年鼠 In 1998, mouse 1999年水牛 In 1999, buffalo 2000年猪 In 2000, pig 2001年山羊 In 2001, goat 2002年兔 In 2002, rabbit 2002年猫 In 2002, cat 2003年骡子 In 2003, mule 2003年马 In 2003, horse |
超数排卵 Superovulation techniques | 1972年鼠 In 1972, mouse | 1983年山羊 In 1983, goat 1993年犬 In 1993, dog 1997年兔 In 1997, rabbit 2002年猫 In 2002, cat |
Table 1 Summary of historical development of assisted reproduction technology.The data is referenced from Gordon (2004)
辅助生殖技术 Assisted reproductive technology | 首次应用 First application | 后续发展 Follow up development |
---|---|---|
体外受精 In vitro fertilization | 1890年兔 In 1890, rabbit | 1949年绵羊、山羊 In 1949, sheep, goat 1951年猪、牛 In 1951, pig, cattle 1974年牛 In 1974,cattle |
人工授精 Artificial insemination | 1780年犬 In 1780, dog | 1912年马、牛和羊 In 1912, horse, cattle and sheep 1952年牛 In 1952, cattle 1961年猪 In 1961, pig |
体外胚胎生产 In vitro embryo production | 1987年牛 In 1987, cattle | 1991年水牛 In 1991, buffalo 2000年猪 In 2000, pig 2003年马 In 2003, horse |
体细胞核移植 Somatic cell nuclear transfer | 1997年绵羊 In 1997, sheep | 1998年鼠 In 1998, mouse 1999年水牛 In 1999, buffalo 2000年猪 In 2000, pig 2001年山羊 In 2001, goat 2002年兔 In 2002, rabbit 2002年猫 In 2002, cat 2003年骡子 In 2003, mule 2003年马 In 2003, horse |
超数排卵 Superovulation techniques | 1972年鼠 In 1972, mouse | 1983年山羊 In 1983, goat 1993年犬 In 1993, dog 1997年兔 In 1997, rabbit 2002年猫 In 2002, cat |
Fig. 1 In vitro development of cheetah iSCNT embryos (Moulavi et al., 2017). A: Representative images of cheetah iSCNT embryos; B: The same embryos after staining with Hoechst33342 and observation using epifluorescent microscope. Arrows in figures A and B show embryos with different degrees of fragmentation
物种 Name of species | IUCN 类别 IUCN Category | 国家 Country | 供核细胞 Karyoplast | 供卵母细胞动物 Oocyte donor | 卵裂率 Cleavage rate(%) | 桑椹胚率 Morula percentage(%) | 囊胚率 Blastocyst percentage(%) | 妊娠率 Pregnancy rate(%) | 产仔数 No. of births (only) | 文献 References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虎 Panthera tigris | EN | 意大利 Italy | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 兔 Rabbit | N/A | 19.8 | 4.9 | N/A | — | |
虎 Panthera tigris | EN | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 18.6 | 3.4 | N/A | — | |
虎 Panthera tigris | EN | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 25.4 | 12.7 | N/A | — | |
狮子 Panthera leo | EN | 意大利 Italy | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 兔 Rabbit | N/A | 13.5 | 4.5 | N/A | — | |
亚洲猎豹 Acinonyx jubatus venaticus | VU | 伊朗 Iran | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 5.9 | — | — | — | |
花豹 Panthera pardus | VU | 意大利 Italy | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 兔 Rabbit | N/A | 13.4 | 4.1 | N/A | — | |
猎豹 Acinonyx jubatus | VU | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 43.7 | 37.4 | N/A | — | |
猎豹 Acinonyx jubatus | VU | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 37.8 | 22.3 | N/A | — | |
豹猫 Prionailurus bengalensis | LC | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 38.0 | 37.2 | N/A | — | |
豹猫 Prionailurus bengalensis | LC | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 35.1 | 46.9 | N/A | — | |
狞猫 Caracal caracal | LC | 美国 USA | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 猫 Cat | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1 | |
非洲野犬 Lycaon pictus | EN | 韩国 Korea | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 犬 Dog | 81.9 | N/A | N/A | 3.4 | — | |
郊狼 Canis latrans | LC | 韩国 Korea | 胎儿成纤维细胞 Fetal Fibroblasts | 家犬 Domestic dog | 87.3 | N/A | N/A | 17.6 | 5 | |
郊狼 Canis latrans | LC | 韩国 Korea | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 家犬 Domestic dog | 85.7 | N/A | N/A | 60.0 | 3 | |
貉 Nyctereutes procyonoides | LC | 韩国 Korea | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 猪 Pig | 77.5 | N/A | N/A | — | — | |
印度野牛 Bos gaurus | VU | 泰国 Thailand | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 牛 Bovine | N/A | 46.3 | 35.3 | 25.0 | 1 | |
印度野牛 Bos gaurus | VU | 泰国 Thailand | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 牛 Bovine | N/A | 45.0 | 35.2 | 26.0 | — | |
野水牛 Bubalus arnee | EN | 印度 India | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 水牛 Buffalo | 93.2 | N/A | 38.0 | — | — | |
野水牛 Bubalus arnee | EN | 印度 India | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 水牛 Buffalo | 93.4 | N/A | 53.9 | — | — | |
野水牛 Bubalus arnee | EN | 印度 India | 上皮细胞 Epithelial cell | 水牛 Buffalo | 85.4 | N/A | 20.2 | — | — | |
盘羊 Ovis ammon | NT | 中国 China | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 羊 Sheep | 84.3 | N/A | 15.7 | — | — |
Table 2 Summary of interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer studies on wild animals in recent ten years
物种 Name of species | IUCN 类别 IUCN Category | 国家 Country | 供核细胞 Karyoplast | 供卵母细胞动物 Oocyte donor | 卵裂率 Cleavage rate(%) | 桑椹胚率 Morula percentage(%) | 囊胚率 Blastocyst percentage(%) | 妊娠率 Pregnancy rate(%) | 产仔数 No. of births (only) | 文献 References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虎 Panthera tigris | EN | 意大利 Italy | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 兔 Rabbit | N/A | 19.8 | 4.9 | N/A | — | |
虎 Panthera tigris | EN | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 18.6 | 3.4 | N/A | — | |
虎 Panthera tigris | EN | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 25.4 | 12.7 | N/A | — | |
狮子 Panthera leo | EN | 意大利 Italy | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 兔 Rabbit | N/A | 13.5 | 4.5 | N/A | — | |
亚洲猎豹 Acinonyx jubatus venaticus | VU | 伊朗 Iran | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 5.9 | — | — | — | |
花豹 Panthera pardus | VU | 意大利 Italy | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 兔 Rabbit | N/A | 13.4 | 4.1 | N/A | — | |
猎豹 Acinonyx jubatus | VU | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 43.7 | 37.4 | N/A | — | |
猎豹 Acinonyx jubatus | VU | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 37.8 | 22.3 | N/A | — | |
豹猫 Prionailurus bengalensis | LC | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 38.0 | 37.2 | N/A | — | |
豹猫 Prionailurus bengalensis | LC | 阿根廷 Argentina | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 家猫 Domestic cat | N/A | 35.1 | 46.9 | N/A | — | |
狞猫 Caracal caracal | LC | 美国 USA | 成纤维细胞Fibroblasts | 猫 Cat | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1 | |
非洲野犬 Lycaon pictus | EN | 韩国 Korea | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 犬 Dog | 81.9 | N/A | N/A | 3.4 | — | |
郊狼 Canis latrans | LC | 韩国 Korea | 胎儿成纤维细胞 Fetal Fibroblasts | 家犬 Domestic dog | 87.3 | N/A | N/A | 17.6 | 5 | |
郊狼 Canis latrans | LC | 韩国 Korea | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 家犬 Domestic dog | 85.7 | N/A | N/A | 60.0 | 3 | |
貉 Nyctereutes procyonoides | LC | 韩国 Korea | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 猪 Pig | 77.5 | N/A | N/A | — | — | |
印度野牛 Bos gaurus | VU | 泰国 Thailand | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 牛 Bovine | N/A | 46.3 | 35.3 | 25.0 | 1 | |
印度野牛 Bos gaurus | VU | 泰国 Thailand | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 牛 Bovine | N/A | 45.0 | 35.2 | 26.0 | — | |
野水牛 Bubalus arnee | EN | 印度 India | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 水牛 Buffalo | 93.2 | N/A | 38.0 | — | — | |
野水牛 Bubalus arnee | EN | 印度 India | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 水牛 Buffalo | 93.4 | N/A | 53.9 | — | — | |
野水牛 Bubalus arnee | EN | 印度 India | 上皮细胞 Epithelial cell | 水牛 Buffalo | 85.4 | N/A | 20.2 | — | — | |
盘羊 Ovis ammon | NT | 中国 China | 成纤维细胞 Fibroblasts | 羊 Sheep | 84.3 | N/A | 15.7 | — | — |
Borges A A, Lira G P O, Nascimento L E, Santos M V O, Oliveira M F, Silva A R, Pereira A F. 2020. Isolation, characterization, and cryopreservation of collared peccary skin-derived fibroblast cell lines. PeerJ, 8: e9136. | |
Borges A A, Pereira A F. 2019. Potential role of intraspecific and interspecific cloning in the conservation of wild mammals. Zygote, 27: 111-117. | |
Borges A A, Santos M V O, Nascimento L E, Lira G P O, Praxedes É A, Oliveira M F, Silva A R, Pereira A F. 2020. Production of collared peccary (Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758) parthenogenic embryos following different oocyte chemical activation and in vitro maturation conditions. Theriogenology, 142: 320-327. | |
Cibelli J B, Stice S L, Golueke P J, Kane J J, Jerry J, Blackwell C, Ponce de León F A, Robl J M. 1998. Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science, 280: 1256-1258. | |
Crosier A E, Lamy J, Bapodra P, Rapp S, Maly M, Junge R, Haefele H, Ahistus J, Santiestevan J, Comizzoli P. 2020. First birth of cheetah cubs from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Animals, 10 (10): 1811. | |
Czernik M, Anzalone D A, Palazzese L, Oikawa M, Loi P. 2019. Somatic cell nuclear transfer: failures, successes and the challenges ahead. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 63(3-4-5): 123-130. | |
Giger M, Eckert S, Lay J. 2021. Large-scale land acquisitions, agricultural trade, and zoonotic diseases: Overlooked links. One Earth, 4 (5): 605-608. | |
Gonzales H, Scotto C, Davalos R, Gonzales H, Scotto C. 2019. Biotecnologia reproductive en animales silvestres. Reproductive Biotechnology in Wild Animals, 9: 69-82. | |
Gómez M C, Jenkins J A, Giraldo A, Harris R F, King A, Dresser B L, Pope C E. 2003. Nuclear transfer of synchronized african wild cat somatic cells into enucleated domestic cat oocytes. Biology of Reproduction, 69: 1032-1041. | |
Gómez M C, Pope E, Kutner R, Ricks D M, Lyons L A, Ruhe M, Dumas C, Lyons J, López M, Dresser B L, Reiser J. 2008. Nuclear transfer of sand cat cells into enucleated domestic cat oocytes is affected by cryopreservation of donor cells. Cloning Stem Cells, 10 (4): 469-483. | |
Gordon I R. 2004. Reproductive Technologies in Farm Animals.Oxford, UK: CABI Publishing. | |
Herrick J R. 2019. Assisted reproductive technologies for endangered species conservation: developing sophisticated protocols with limited access to animals with unique reproductive mechanisms. Biology of Reproduction, 100: 1158-1170. | |
Huang G, Ping X G, Xu W H, Hu Y B, Chang J, Swaisgood R R, Wei F. 2021. Wildlife conservation and management in China: achievements, challenges and perspectives. National Science Review, 8 (7): nwab042. | |
Hwang I, Jeong Y W, Kim J J, Lee H J, Kang M, Park K B, Park J H, Kim Y W, Kim W T, Shin T, Hyun S H, Jeung E B, Hwang W S. 2013. Successful cloning of coyotes through interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer using domestic dog oocytes. Reproduction Fertility and Development, 25: 1142-1148. | |
Iqbal A, Ping J, Ali S, Gao Z, Jin Z K, Pan Z Y, Lu H X, Zhao Z H. 2021. Conservation of endangered species through somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Conservation Genetics Resources, 13: 349-357. | |
Jeon Y, Nam Y H, Cheong S A, Kwak S S, Lee E, Hyun S H. 2016. Absence of nucleolus formation in raccoon dog-porcine interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos results in embryonic developmental failure. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 62: 345-350. | |
Jewgenow K, Zahmel J. 2020. Preservation of female genetic resources in feline species. Theriogenology, 156: 124-129. | |
Kim M J, Oh H J, Kim G A, Setyawan E M N, Choi Y B, Lee S H, Petersen‑Jones S M, Ko C J, Lee B C. 2017. Birth of clones of the world’s first cloned dog. Scientific Reports, 7: 15235. | |
Kumar D, Talluri T R, Anand T, Kues W A. 2015. Induced pluripotent stem cells: Mechanisms, achievements and perspectives in farm animals. World Journal of Stem Cells, 7 (2): 315-328. | |
Lambo C, Bateman H, Swanson W. 2014. Application of laparoscopic oviductal artificial insemination for conservation management of brazilian ocelots and amur tigers. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 26: 116. | |
Lanza R P, Cibelli J B, Diaz F, Moraes C T, Farin P W, Farin C E, Hammer C J, West M D, Damiani P. 2000. Cloning of an endangered species (Bos gaurus) using interspecies nuclear transfer. Cloning, 2 (2): 79-90. | |
Lee B, Wirtu G G, Damiani P, Pope E, Dresser B L, Hwang W, Bavister B D. 2003. Blastocyst development after intergeneric nuclear transfer of mountain bongo antelope somatic cells into bovine oocytes. Cloning Stem Cells, 5: 25-33. | |
Liang W, Tao P, Hai Z, Lv Z L, Liu T, Shuai Z Q T, Hong G, Tao C, Xu C, Wang H Q. 2007. In vitro development of reconstructed ibex (Capra ibex) embryos by nuclear transfer using goat (Capra hircus) oocytes. Small Ruminant Research, 73: 135-141. | |
Lira G P O, Borges A A, Nascimento M B D, Aquino L V C, Moura Lfmp, Silva H V R, Ribeiro L R, Oliveira M F, Pereira A F. 2021. Effects of somatic tissue cryopreservation on puma (Puma concolor L, 1771) tissue integrity and cell preservation after in vitro culture. Cryobiology, 101: 52-60. | |
Loi P, Ptak G, Barboni B, Fulka J, Cappai Jr P, Clinton M. 2001. Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by cross‑species nuclear transfer using post‑mortem somatic cells. Nature Biotechnology, 19: 962-964. | |
Lueders I, Allen T W R. 2020. Managed wildlife breeding-an undervalued conservation tool? Theriogenology, 150: 48-54. | |
Lueders I, Ludwig C, Mr Schroede, Mueller K, Zahmel J, Dehnhard M. 2014. Successful nonsurgical artificial insemination and hormonal monitoring in an Asiatic golden cat (Catopuma temmincki). Journal of Zoo Wildlife Medicine, 45: 372-379. | |
Mastromonaco G F, Songsasen N. 2020. Reproductive technologies for the conservation of wildlife and endangered species. Reproductive Technologies in Animals, 7: 99-117. | |
Moro L N, Hiriart M I, Buemo C, Jarazo J, Sestelo A, Veraguas D, Rodriguez‑Alvarez L, Salamone D F. 2015. Cheetah interspecific SCNT followed by embryo aggregation improves in vitro development but not pluripotent gene expression. Reproduction, 150: 1-10. | |
Moro L N, Jarazo J, Buemo C, Hiriart M I, Sestelo A, Salamone D F. 2015. Tiger, bengal and domestic cat embryos produced by homospecific and interspecific zona‑free nuclear transfer. Reproduction in Domestic Animal, 50: 849-857. | |
Moulavi F, Hosseini S M, Tanhaie‑Vash N, Ostadhosseini S, Hosseini S H, Hajinasrollah M, Asghari M H, Gourabi H, Shahverdi A, Vosough A D, Nasr‑Esfahani M H. 2017. Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer in Asiatic cheetah using nuclei derived from post-mortem frozen tissue in absence of cryo‑protectant and in vitro matured domestic cat oocytes. Theriogenology, 90: 197-203. | |
Mrowiec P, Bugno‑Poniewierska M, Młodawska W. 2021. The perspective of the incompatible of nucleus and mitochondria in interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer for endangered species. Reproduction in Domestic Animal, 56 (2): 199-207. | |
Nagashima J B, Songsasen N. 2021. Canid reproductive biology: norm and unique aspects in strategies and mechanisms. Animals, 11 (3): 653. | |
Nelson E D, Larson E, Joo D J, Mao S, Glorioso J, Abu R A, Zhou W, Jia Y, Mounajjed T, Shi M, Bois M, Wood A, Jin F, Whitworth K, Wells K, Spate A, Samuel M, Minshew A, Walters E, Rinaldo P, Lillegard J B, Johnson A, Amiot B, Hickey R, Prather R, Platt J L, Nyberg S L. 2022. Limited expansion of human hepatocytes in FAH/RAG2-deficient swine. Tissue Engineering Part A, 28 (3-4): 150-160. | |
Oh H J, Kim M K, Jang G, Kim H J, Hong S G, Park J E, Park K, Park C, Sohn S H, Kim, Shin N S, Lee B C. 2008. Cloning endangered gray wolves (Canis lupu) from somatic cells collected postmortem. Theriogenology, 70: 638-647. | |
Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry A C. 2000. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science, 289: 1188-1190. | |
Pan X Y, Zhang Y L, Guo Z Q, Wang F. 2014. Development of interspecies nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed with argali (Ovis ammon) somatic cells and sheep ooplasm. Cell Biology International, 38: 211-218. | |
Pope C E. 2014. Aspects of in vivo oocyte production, blastocyst development, and embryo transfer in the cat. Theriogenology, 81: 126-137. | |
Priya D, Selokar N L, Raja A K, Saini M, Sahare A A, Nala N, Palta P, Chauhan M S, Manik R S, Singla S K. 2014. Production of wild buffalo (Bubalus arnee) embryos by interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer using domestic buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocytes. Reproduction in Domestic Animal, 49: 343-351. | |
Saini M, Selokar N L, Raja A K, Sahare A A, Singla S K, Chauhan M S, Manik R S, Palta P. 2015.Effect of donor cell type on developmental competence, quality, gene expression, and epigenetic status of interspecies cloned embryos produced using cells from wild buffalo and oocytes from domestic buffalo. Theriogenology, 84: 101-108.. | |
Sansinena M J, Hylan D, Hebert K, Denniston R S, Godke R A. 2005. Banteng (Bos javanicus) embryos and pregnancies produced by interspecies nuclear transfer. Theriogenology, 63: 1081-1091. | |
Santos M L T, Borges A A, Neta L B Q, Santos M V O, Oliveira M F, Silva A R, Pereira A F. 2016. In vitro culture of somatic cells derived from ear tissue of collared peccary (Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758) in medium with different requirements. Pesquisa veterinaria Brasileira, 36: 1194-1202. | |
Shogo M, Zhang Y. 2018. Somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming: mechanisms and applications. Cell Stem Cell, 23 (4): 471-485. | |
Sun S Y, Liao Z D, Liu Z, Sun Q. 2021. Cloning of monkeys by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2239: 19-31. | |
Son Y B, Jeong Y I, Hwang K C, Jeong Y W, Hwang W S. 2021. Mitochondrial metabolism assessment of lycaon‑dog fetuses in interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer. Theriogenology, 165: 18-27. | |
Soni V K. 2021. Wildlife Conservation in India: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research, 12: 796-802. | |
Srirattana K, Imsoonthornruksa S, Laowtammathron C, Sangmalee A, Tunwattana W, Thongprapai T, Chaimongkol C, Ketudat‑Cairns M, Parnpai R. 2012. Full‑term development of gaur‑bovine interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos: effect of trichostatin A treatment. Cell Reprogram, 14: 248-257. | |
Swanson W F. 2012. Laparoscopic oviductal embryo transfer and artificial insemination in felids‒challenges, strategies and successes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 47 (6): 136-140. | |
Teitelbaum C S, Altizer S, Hall R J. 2022. Habitat specialization by wildlife reduces pathogen spread in urbanizing landscapes. The American Naturalist, 199 (2): 238-251. | |
Thongphakdee A, Siriaroonrat B, Manee‑in S, Klincumhom N, Kamolnorranath S, Chatdarong K, Techakumphu M. 2010. Intergeneric somatic cell nucleus transfer in marbled cat and flat‑headed cat. Theriogenology, 73: 120-128. | |
Thongphakdee A, Sukparangsi W, Comizzoli P, Chatdarong K. 2020. Reproductive biology and biotechnologies in wild felids. Theriogenology, 150: 360-373. | |
Tipkantha W, Thuwanut P, Maikeaw U, Thongphakdee A, Yapila S, Kamolnorranath S, Siriaroonrat B, Comizzoli P, Chatdarong K. 2017. Successful laparoscopic oviductal artificial insemination in the clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa) in thailand. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 48: 804-812. | |
Toru S, Tony P. 2018. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): Applications and insights. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Indications, Techniques and Applications, 11: 169-181 | |
Yang H Q, Wu Z F. 2018. Genome editing of pigs for agriculture and biomedicine. Frontiers in Genetics, 9: 360. | |
Yelisetti U M, Komjeti S, Katari V C, Sisinthy S, Brahmasani S R. 2016. Interspecies nuclear transfer using fibroblasts from leopard, tiger, and lion ear piece collected postmortem as donor cells and rabbit oocytes as recipients. In Vitro Cellular of Developmental Biology-Animal, 52: 632-645. | |
Zubair A, Mohd M J, Hidayatullah T, Rayees A, Naseer A. 2021. Human wildlife conflict consequences, causes and future perspectives on mitigation, district kupwara j&k, india. International Journal of Scientific Research & Growth, 9 (4): 1887-1892. |
[1] | ZHENG Kaidan, WANG Qiaoyun, FAN Pengfei, HAN Xuesong, XIAO Mei, SHEN Limin, DONG Zhengyi, ZHANG Lu. Individual identification and genetic diversity of Eurasian otters based on microsatellite markers [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 44(2): 146-158. |
[2] | Saiqinggaowa, WANG Zihan, LI Quanbang, WANG Dong, LIAN Xinming. Parentage testing and genetic diversity of Tibetan antelope individuals in or among mating groups [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 44(2): 159-170. |
[3] | YUAN Daohuan, CHENG Shoujie, YUAN Qianmin, JI Yu, QIN Jiao, LIANG Yitian, LIU Quansheng. Spatiotemporal variation of composition and diversity of small mammals in Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 44(2): 252-258. |
[4] | ZHANG Rumei, ZHANG Qing, YANG Xiao, ZHANG Farui, ZHAO Ding, PANG Dehong, YANG Kong, GUAN Tianpei. Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of mammal diversity in alpine ecosystems: a case study in Xuebaoding area of Giant Panda National Park [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(5): 533-543. |
[5] | PING Xiaoge, ZHU Jiang, WEI Fuwen. From Egypt to Kunming-Montreal—The shift of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(4): 357-363. |
[6] | Ling LIU, Aigang XIAO, Tiejian ZHAO, Xiaomei FENG, Suxia SHEN, Xianwang LU, Hongwu GUAN, Dapeng ZHAO. Behavioral ethogram and posture‒act‒environment coding system of wild Leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) based on infrared camera technology [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(3): 270-279. |
[7] | Xiangdong RUAN, Yixin CHEN, Boyu WANG, Xiao YANG, Chunlin LIAO, Yang YU, Cheng GUO. Diversity and activity rhythm of mammals and birds in the Badagongshan National Nature Reserve, Hunan inferred through camera traps [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(3): 342-351. |
[8] | Tongzuo ZHANG, Feng JIANG, Jingjie ZHANG, Zhenyuan CAI, Hongmei GAO, Haifeng GU, Pengfei SONG. A review of wildlife conservation and management strategies of Sanjiangyuan National Park [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(2): 193-205. |
[9] | Bo XIE, Xiuping NONG, Guoli HUANG, Rong HUANG, Wei YAO, Jianzhong LIN, Qihai ZHOU. Preliminary survey of mammals and birds diversity by using camera traps in the Guangxi Encheng National Nature Reserve [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(2): 215-223. |
[10] | Feng JIANG, Pengfei SONG, Jingjie ZHANG, Hongmei GAO, Haijing WANG, Zhenyuan CAI, Daoxin LIU, Tongzuo ZHANG. Comparative analysis of gut microbial composition and functions of forest musk deer in different breeding centres [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(2): 129-140. |
[11] | Qinghao ZHANG, Song YAO, Kai XU, Tong LIU, Wenhong XIAO, Bingyong BAI, Xiaoqun HUANG, Zhishu XIAO. Bird and mammal diversity inventory by camera trapping in the Neixiang Baotianman National Nature Reserve, Henan Province [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(2): 206-214. |
[12] | TIAN Xinmin, ZHANG Minghai. Genetic diversity of wapiti in northeast China based on fecal DNA [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 43(1): 41-49. |
[13] | Ruotong CHENG, Yibo CHEN, Xiangqiong MENG, Jiarui CHEN, Qing WEI. Genetic diversity of male specific region of Y chromosome in Tibetan antelope [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(5): 609-614. |
[14] | Xinmin TIAN, Mingdong LIAN, Yaqi SONG, Xiaohui LIU, Mengping YANG, Hong CHEN. Genetic diversity and demographic history of Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) population in northern Zhangguangcai Mountains, Heilongjiang, China [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(4): 398-409. |
[15] | WANG Donghui, LIU Yuliang, SHEN Fujun, CAI Zhigang, AN Junhui, HOU Rong. The effect of frozen semen of captive giant pandas on their population genetic diversity [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(3): 261-269. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||