Giant panda pose estimation method based on high resolution net

doi:10.16829/j.slxb.150639

Abstract

Abstract:

Long-term behavioral monitoring of captive giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) can help animal managers better understand the panda’s physiological cycle and health status in a timely manner, and help breeding facilities quickly take corresponding husbandry actions to improve breeding management. At present, neither animal managers nor scientists can monitor giant pandas 24 hours a day and obtain corresponding behavioral information on time. Accurate animal pose estimation is an important factor in animal behavior research and is also the basis for many downstream applications. Understanding the pose of giant pandas can greatly promote the research of panda behavior and improve its conservation and management. In order to improve the accuracy of giant panda pose estimation in complex environments, this paper proposed a pose estimation method based on the high-resolution network HRNet-32. To solve the problem of large-scale differences in different parts of the giant pandas, an atrous spatial pyramid pooling module was introduced in HRNet-32, which used dilated convolution with different dilated rates to form a similar pyramid form, so as to capture multi-scale information while enhancing the feature’s receptive field. Meanwhile, the giant panda pose estimation was regarded as a homogeneous multi-task learning problem, the joint points of the giant panda were grouped, and the part-based multi-branch structure was introduced to learn the representations specific to each part group. The results of several comparison experiments show that the model proposed in this paper, PCK@0.05, had a high detection accuracy (81.51%). The method proposed in this paper can provide technical support for the behavioral analysis and health assessment of giant pandas.

Key words: Giant panda, Posture estimation, Image analysis, Deep learning

摘要：

对圈养大熊猫 (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) 开展长期行为监测能及时了解其所处生理周期和健康状况，有助于繁殖饲养机构迅速采取相应繁育保护措施提高饲养管理水平，但目前无法对大熊猫进行24 h监控并及时地获得相应的行为信息。准确的动物姿态估计是动物行为研究的关键，也是诸多下游应用的基础。了解大熊猫的姿态可以促进大熊猫行为研究并提升保护管理水平。为了提高复杂环境下大熊猫姿态估计的准确率，本文以高分辨率网络 (High resolution net, HRNet) 为基础网络架构提出了一种大熊猫姿态估计方法：针对大熊猫不同部位尺度差异较大的问题，在HRNet-32中引入了空洞空间金字塔池化 (Atrous spatial pyramid pooling, ASPP) 模块，在提升特征感受野的同时捕获多尺度信息；同时对大熊猫身体关键点进行分组，引入基于部位的多分支结构来学习特定于每个部位组的表征。多次对比实验结果表明本文所用模型具有较高的检测精度：在PCK@0.05中所用模型精度达到了81.51%。本文提出的方法可为大熊猫的行为分析和健康评估提供技术支撑。

关键词: 大熊猫, 姿态估计, 图像分析, 深度学习

CLC Number:

Q958.1

Yu QI, Han SU, Rong HOU, Peng LIU, Peng CHEN, Hangxing ZANG, Zhihe ZHANG. Giant panda pose estimation method based on high resolution net[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(4): 451-460.

漆愚, 苏菡, 侯蓉, 刘鹏, 陈鹏, 臧航行, 张志和. 基于高分辨率网络的大熊猫姿态估计方法[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(4): 451-460.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1 Diagram of video framed image of giant panda. a - c: available data samples; d - f: unavailable data samples

Fig.2 Diagram of the joint points of the giant panda. 1: right ear; 2: left ear; 3: nose; 4: neck; 5: back; 6: hip; 7: right shoulder; 8: right elbow; 9: right front paw; 10: left shoulder; 11: left elbow; 12: left front paw; 13: right hip; 14: right knee; 15: right hind paw; 16: left hip; 17: left knee; 18: left hind paw; 19: the giant panda target box

Fig.3 The proposed giant panda pose estimation framework. The first stage is shared feature representation, the second stage is multi-branched structures for learning specific high-level feature representations

Fig.4 HRNet network structure (Sun et al., 2019)

Fig.5 Diagram of ASPP module (Chen et al., 2017)

Fig.6 Diagram of the grouping of giant panda joints. The giant panda joint points are divided into 5 groups by the dotted frame, and the joint points of the same group have the same color

Table 1 Comparison results of pose estimation of giant panda

方法 Methods	PCK@0.05 Accuracy For the Panda Dataset （%）
方法 Methods	耳 Ear	鼻 Nose	躯干Trunk	腿部Legs	平均Mean
8-Stack HG	93.99	97.50	68.22	71.84	74.12
Simple Baseline	97.39	98.18	74.39	78.10	80.00
HRNet32	96.97	98.75	75.63	78.72	80.31
This study	98.38	98.18	75.84	79.84	81.51

Fig.7 Example image of giant panda pose estimation prediction. The first three columns are the giant panda pose estimates predicted by the comparison model, the fourth column is the prediction result of the model proposed in this paper, and the last column is the true value of the pose estimation

Table 2 Results of ablation experiment for giant panda pose estimation

方法 Methods	PCK@0.05 Accuracy For the Panda Dataset （%）
方法 Methods	耳 Ear	鼻Nose	躯干 Trunk	腿部 Legs	平均 Mean
HRNet32	96.97	98.75	75.63	78.72	80.31
HRNet32 + Multi‑Branches	97.34	98.86	74.39	79.58	80.75
HRNet32 + ASPP + MultiBranches	98.38	98.18	75.84	79.84	81.51

Fig.8 The giant panda pose estimation of this study model. a: The prediction result of the model with good shooting Angle and small occlusion; b: The prediction result of the model with dark surrounding environment and serious self-occlusion

References 0

	Cao J K, Tang H Y, Fang H S, Shen X Y, Tai Y W, Lu C W. 2019. Cross-domain adaptation for animal pose estimation. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). DOI:10.1109/iccv.2019.00959 .
	Cao Z, Simon T, Wei S E, Sheikh Y. 2017. Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.143 .
	Caruana R. 1997. Multitask learning. Machine Learning, 28 (1): 41-75.
	Chen L C, Papandreou G, Schroff F, Adam H. 2017. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic Image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv: .
	Chen X L, Zhu Y, Li Y D, Zhang G Q. 2016. The influence of human activities on the behavior of captive giant panda in summer at Mount Emei. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 35 (5): 680-685. (in Chinese)
	Chen Y K, Song Y N, He J J, Xu R H, Huang X B. 2019. Animal pose estimation and state assessment based on deep learning. Electronics World, (5): 47-48. (in Chinese)
	Chen Y L, Wang Z C, Peng Y X, Zhang Z Q, Yu G, Sun J. 2018. Cascaded pyramid network for multi-person pose estimation. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00742 .
	Fang H S, Xie S Q, Tai Y W, Lu C W. 2017. Rmpe: Regional multi-person pose estimation. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.256 .
	Feng L Q, Zhao Y Q, Sun Y C, Zhao W X, Tang J X. 2021. Action recognition using a spatial-temporal network for wild felines. Animals, 11 (2): 485.
	He K M, Zhang X Y, Ren S Q, Sun J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 .
	He Q, Zhao Q J, Liu N, Chen P, Zhang Z H, Hou R. 2019. Distinguishing individual red pandas from their faces. Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision (PRCV). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31723-2_61 .
	Hu P Y, Ramanan D. 2016. Bottom-up and top-down reasoning with hierarchical rectified gaussians. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2016.604 .
	Koolhaas J M, Van Reenen C G. 2016. Animal behavior and well-being symposium: Interaction between coping style/personality, stress, and welfare: Relevance for domestic farm animals. Journal of Animal Science, 94 (6): 2284-2296.
	Li C W, Wang C D, Yan B Y, Chen S J, Wu H L, Huang X Y, Jin S Y, Huang S, Chen L, Li D S. 2012. The determination of blood physiological indices for the giant panda. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 32 (3): 266-270. (in Chinese)
	Li C, Lee G H. 2021. From synthetic to real: Unsupervised domain adaptation for animal pose estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
	Li X Y, Cai C, Zhang R F, Ju L, He J R. 2019. Deep cascaded convolutional models for cattle pose estimation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 164: 104885.
	Lin T Y, Maire M, Belongie S, Hays J, Perona P, Ramanan D, Dollár P, Zitnick C L. 2014. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. European Conference on Computer Vision.
	Liu J, Chen Y, Guo L R, Gu B, Liu H, Hou A Y, Liu X F, Sun L X, Liu D Z. 2006. Stereotypic behavior and fecal cortisol level in captive giant pandas in relation to environmental enrichment. Zoo Biology, 25 (6): 445-459.
	Liu N, Zhao Q J, Zhang N, Cheng X H, Zhu J N. 2019. Pose‑guided complementary features learning for amur tiger re-identification. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops.
	Mu J T, Qiu W C, Hager G D, Yuille A L. 2020. Learning from synthetic animals. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01240 .
	Newell A, Yang K Y, Deng J. 2016. Stacked hourglass networks for human pose estimation. European Conference on Computer Vision. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46484-8_29 .
	Olivas E S, Guerrero J D M, Martinez-Sober M, Magdalena-Benedito J R, Serrano L, eds. 2019. Handbook of research on machine learning applications and trends: Algorithms, methods, and techniques: Algorithms, methods, and techniques. IGI Global.
	Pishchulin L, Andriluka M, Gehler P, Schiele B. 2013. Poselet conditioned pictorial structures. 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2013.82 .
	Pishchulin L, Insafutdinov E, Tang S Y, Andres B, Andriluka M, Gehler P, Schiele B. 2016. Deepcut: Joint subset partition and labeling for multi person pose estimation. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2016.533 .
	Ruder S. 2017. An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv: .
	Rushen J, Butterworth A, Swanson J C. 2011. Animal behavior and well-being symposium: Farm animal welfare assurance: Science and application. Journal of Animal Science, 89 (4): 1219-1228.
	Schofield D, Nagrani A, Zisserman A, Hayashi M, Matsuzawa T, Biro D, Carvalho S. 2019. Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning. Science Advances, 5 (9): eaaw0736.
	Sun K, Xiao B, Liu D, Wang J D. 2019. Deep high-resolution representation learning for human pose estimation. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00584 .
	Tang W, Wu Y. 2019. Does learning specific features for related parts help human pose estimation? 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00120 .
	Tian Y D, Zitnick C L, Narasimhan S G. 2012. Exploring the spatial hierarchy of mixture models for human pose estimation. European Conference on Computer Vision. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33715-4_19 .
	Toshev A, Szegedy C. 2014. Deeppose: Human pose estimation via deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.
	Wang H N, Su H, Chen P, Hou R, Zhang Z H, Xie W Y. 2019. Learning deep features for giant panda gender classification using face images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops.
	Xiao B, Wu H P, Wei Y C. 2018. Simple baselines for human pose estimation and tracking. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01231-1_29 .
	Yang W, Li S, Ouyang W L, Li H S, Wang X G. 2017. Learning feature pyramids for human pose estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.144 .
	Yang Y, Jia J B, Zhao Y J. 2019. Effects of human factors on panda behavior in captivity. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 47 (12): 104-106. (in Chinese)
	Yu H, Xu Y F, Zhang J, Zhao W, Guan Z Y, Tao D C. 2021. AP- 10K: A benchmark for animal pose estimation in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv: .
	Yue L H, Li J X, Liu Q S. 2021. Body parts relevance learning via expectation–maximization for human pose estimation. Multimedia Systems, 27 (5): 927-939.
	Zhang B W, Li M, Zhang Z J, Goossens B, Zhu L F, Zhang S N, Hu J C, Bruford M W, Wei F W. 2007. Genetic viability and population history of the giant panda, putting an end to the‘Evolutionary Dead End’? Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24 (8): 1801-1810.
	Zhang F Y, Wang M L, Wang Z C. 2021. Construction of the animal skeletons keypoint detection model based on transformer and scale fusion. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 37 (23): 179-185. (in Chinese)
	Zhou F X, Jiang Z H, Liu Z H, Chen F, Chen L, Tong L, Yang Z L, Wang H K, Fei M R, Li L, Zhou H Y. 2021. Structured context enhancement network for mouse pose estimation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. DOI:10.1109/tcsvt.2021.3098497 .
	Zhou J L, Ma G Q, Li Q S, Liu C H, Liu D D, Ye Y L, Wang X B. 2012. Exploitation on spring stereotypic behavior of giant pandas in wildlife park of high‑altitude region. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 31 (3): 342-347. (in Chinese)
	Zhou X, Hu H P, Li T, Deng L H, Li R G. 2013. Behavior and conservation of giant panda. Green Technology, (2): 33-36. (in Chinese)
	李才武, 王承东, 严玉宝, 陈世界, 吴虹林, 黄晓宇, 金森燕, 黄山, 陈亮, 李德生. 2012. 大熊猫血液生理指标的测定. 兽类学报, 32 (3): 266-270.
	李凯年. 2012. 饲养人员行为对农场动物福利与生产性能的影响. 中国动物保健, 14 (1): 4-8.
	杨勇, 贾竞波, 赵英杰. 2019. 圈养环境中人为因素对大熊猫行为的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 47 (12): 104-106.
	陈永康, 宋亚男, 何嘉俊, 徐荣华, 黄栩滨. 2019. 基于深度学习的动物姿态估计和状态评估研究. 电子世界, (5): 47-48.
	陈艳, 王永峰, 魏荣平, 邓林华. 2019. 圈养大熊猫应激的研究进展. 畜牧兽医科技信息, (2): 15-17.
	陈绪玲, 朱英, 李裕冬, 张贵权. 2016. 人为因素对峨眉山圈养大熊猫夏季行为的影响. 四川动物, 35 (5): 680-685.
	张飞宇, 王美丽, 王正超. 2021. 引入Transformer和尺度融合的动物骨骼关键点检测模型构建. 农业工程学报, 37 (23): 179-185.
	周杰珑, 马国强, 李奇生, 刘成会, 刘丹丹, 叶研琳, 王雄波. 2012. 高海拔地区昆明野生动物园大熊猫春季刻板行为探究. 四川动物, 31 (3): 342-347.
	周晓, 胡海平, 李倜, 邓林华, 李仁贵. 2013. 大熊猫的行为和保护研究. 绿色科技, (2): 33-36.

[1]	WANG Donghui, LIU Yuliang, SHEN Fujun, CAI Zhigang, AN Junhui, HOU Rong. The effect of frozen semen of captive giant pandas on their population genetic diversity [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(3): 261-269.
[2]	HUANG Wenjun, LUO Li, CHEN Xin, LIU Li, LIAO Lihui, WANG Xiaolan, LI Bi, LI Mingxi, CHEN Min, YI Dejiao, LI Han, ZHANG Hao, ZHUO Guifu, LIU Yunjian, LI Yingxin, CHEN Yijun, ZHOU Xuan, XIE Yue. Observation on antinematode activity of the recombinant Bacillus thuringiensis-derived Cry5B against the giant panda Baylisascaris schroederi in vitro [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 42(3): 304-311.
[3]	WANG Ziye, BI Wenlei, WU Wei, YU Jiaojiao, ZHOU Yanshan, HOU Rong, XIANG Zuofu, QI Dunwu. A study on the relationship between oxytocin level and maternal behavior in captive giant pandas [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 41(6): 721-730.
[4]	ZHOU Yanshan, HOU Rong, LIU Jiabin, BI Wenlei, Jacob R. Owens, ZHANG Zhihe, HUANG Feng, LUO Wei, QI Dunwu. Habitat utilization and spatial patterns of pre-released giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 41(6): 641-648.
[5]	SU Xiaoyan, LI Lin, YAN Xia, ZHANG Dongsheng, HOU Rong, LIU Songrui. Establishment and application of giant panda rotavirus PCR detection method [J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 41(3): 254-260.
[6]	CHEN Mengzhu, LIU Songrui, YUE Chanjuan, GENG Yi, SU Xiaoyan, CHEN Yaoyan, CHENG Zixuan. The first case of testicular seminoma pathologic diagnosis in giant panda [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 651-654.
[7]	HOU Jin, YAN Linlu, LI Liang, LI Yujie, LIAO Yushan, ZHANG Jindong. Behavior coding and ethogram of the free-ranging giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2020, 40(5): 446-457.
[8]	LUO Lianlian，ZHOU Hong，TANG Junfeng，WEI Wei，HAN Han，ZHANG Zejun， HONG Mingsheng. Niche differentiation between giant pandas and its sympatric species in altitude distribution [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 337-345.
[9]	DENG Linhua，CHEN Yan，WEI Rongping，WANG Chengdong，HUANG Shan, WEI Ming, XU Yalin, WANG Qun, LI Desheng, ZHANG Zhizhong. Seasonal changes of physiological and blood indices of captive giant panda [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 398-406.
[10]	ZHANG Jindong, HUANG Jinyan, ZHOU Shiqiang, Vanessa HULL, ZHANG Hemin, OUYANG Zhiyun. Spatial utilization and activity pattern characteristics of a giant panda during the reproduction-rearing period#br# [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 421-430.
[11]	GONG Yinan, TAN Mengyu, WANG Zhen, ZHAO Guojing, JIANG Peilin, JIANG Shiming, ZHANG Dingji, GE Jianping, FENG Limin. AI recognition of infrared camera image of wild animals based on deep learning: Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park for example [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 458-465.
[12]	DING Qiaoqi, YU Jinhua, XIE Chunyu, XU Chunzhong, SUN Qiang, BI Jingzheng, CHU Qingpo, ZHOU Yingmin, WU Feng. A preliminary study on the maternal behavior of female giant pandas in Shanghai Wild Animal Park [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 302-310.
[13]	Houjin, Zheng Bochuan, LI Yujie, Bai Wenke, QI Guilan, Dong Junfei, Yang Zejing, Zhang Jindong. Facial recognition of giant pandas based on developmental network recognition mode [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 43-51.
[14]	QIAO Maiju, RAN Jianghong, ZHANG Hemin . The application of microsatellite markers in giant panda research [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 103-110.
[15]	LIN Xiaona, CHU Xiaojing, ZHAO Rui, ZHANG Bowen, LUO Bo, ZHANG Guiquan，LIU Dingzhen. Quantification of giant pandas’ visual acuity [J]. ACTA Theriologica Sinica, 2018, 38(5): 433-441.