兽类学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 810-819.DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.151024
吴江明1, 黄小龙2,3,5, 程绍传2,5, 杨伟4,5, 张旭2,3,6, 冉景丞2,3,5(
)
收稿日期:2024-11-06
接受日期:2025-04-09
出版日期:2025-11-30
发布日期:2025-12-03
通讯作者:
冉景丞
作者简介:吴江明 (1997- ),男,硕士研究生,主要从事动物行为生态学研究.
基金资助:
Jiangming WU1, Xiaolong HUANG2,3,5, Shaochuan CHENG2,5, Wei YANG4,5, Xu ZHANG2,3,6, Jingcheng RAN2,3,5(
)
Received:2024-11-06
Accepted:2025-04-09
Online:2025-11-30
Published:2025-12-03
Contact:
Jingcheng RAN
摘要:
人为噪声重塑了自然环境声景格局,对野生动物行为、分布和警戒性等造成了不利影响。黔金丝猴 (Rhinopithecus brelichi) 是全世界最濒危的灵长类之一,仅栖息在贵州梵净山国家级自然保护区。为掌握黔金丝猴对不同噪声的行为响应,2023年12月至2024年6月,以黔金丝猴研究中心圈养黔金丝猴为研究对象,回放交通噪声、游客噪声、农村生活噪声和鸟类捕食者声音4种噪声并设置声压级梯度 (40 dB、50 dB、60 dB和70 dB),采用焦点动物取样法记录黔金丝猴的行为变化。结果显示:(1) 4种噪声刺激能引起黔金丝猴的警戒时间百分比增加,休息减少;(2) 警戒时间百分比随声压级强度增加呈增长趋势,60 dB声压级刺激时出现躲避现象;(3) 警戒时间百分比在不同噪声间差异显著 (P < 0.05),对鸟类捕食者声音的警戒时间百分比显著高于交通噪声、游客噪声和农村生活噪声等人类噪声;(4) 圈养黔金丝猴对长期接触过的人类噪声可能具有习惯化效应。本研究初步揭示了不同噪声干扰条件下黔金丝猴的行为响应模式,为后续开展其行为学研究,规范人类活动及保护管理措施的制定提供了依据。
中图分类号:
吴江明, 黄小龙, 程绍传, 杨伟, 张旭, 冉景丞. 圈养黔金丝猴对不同噪声的行为响应[J]. 兽类学报, 2025, 45(6): 810-819.
Jiangming WU, Xiaolong HUANG, Shaochuan CHENG, Wei YANG, Xu ZHANG, Jingcheng RAN. Behavioral response of captive Guizhou snub-nosed monkeys to noise from different sources[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2025, 45(6): 810-819.
| 行为 Behavior | 描述 Description |
|---|---|
移动 Moving | 位置发生改变,包括行走、跑、跳、攀爬、摆荡等活动,不包括玩耍 Changes in position, including activities such as walking, running, jumping, climbing, swinging, but not playing |
摄食 Feeding | 将食物送入嘴内并伴有咀嚼的动作 The act of feeding food into the mouth accompanied by chewing |
休息 Resting | 没有明显的位置变化,包括睡觉、躺、坐、站、趴和拥坐 (两个个体及以上紧挨着坐在一起) No significant positional changes, including sleeping, lying down, sitting, standing, lying prone, and hugging (two or more individuals sitting closely together) |
理毛 Grooming | 自我梳理 (单独梳理自身毛发) 和相互理毛 (两个以上个体互相梳理毛发) 的总和 The individual spends time grooming, or being groomed by other members of the group (identified when individual searches other’s fur using hands or mouth) |
一般警戒扫描行为和导向警戒扫描行为的总和 The total combination of general scanning behaviors and playback directed vigilance behaviors | |
叫声 Calling | 个体听到噪声刺激后发出叫声 The individual makes call after hearing the sound stimulus |
其他 Other | 交配、排遗物 (尿、便) Mating, excrement (urine, feces) |
表1 黔金丝猴的行为谱
Table 1 Behavioral spectrum of Guizhou snub-nosed monkey
| 行为 Behavior | 描述 Description |
|---|---|
移动 Moving | 位置发生改变,包括行走、跑、跳、攀爬、摆荡等活动,不包括玩耍 Changes in position, including activities such as walking, running, jumping, climbing, swinging, but not playing |
摄食 Feeding | 将食物送入嘴内并伴有咀嚼的动作 The act of feeding food into the mouth accompanied by chewing |
休息 Resting | 没有明显的位置变化,包括睡觉、躺、坐、站、趴和拥坐 (两个个体及以上紧挨着坐在一起) No significant positional changes, including sleeping, lying down, sitting, standing, lying prone, and hugging (two or more individuals sitting closely together) |
理毛 Grooming | 自我梳理 (单独梳理自身毛发) 和相互理毛 (两个以上个体互相梳理毛发) 的总和 The individual spends time grooming, or being groomed by other members of the group (identified when individual searches other’s fur using hands or mouth) |
一般警戒扫描行为和导向警戒扫描行为的总和 The total combination of general scanning behaviors and playback directed vigilance behaviors | |
叫声 Calling | 个体听到噪声刺激后发出叫声 The individual makes call after hearing the sound stimulus |
其他 Other | 交配、排遗物 (尿、便) Mating, excrement (urine, feces) |
图1 播放期间和播放后的黔金丝猴行为变化. 数据涵盖所有噪声播放条件.*P < 0.05,**P < 0.001
Fig. 1 Behavioral changes in Guizhou snub-nosed monkey during and after sound playback. Data covers all conditions.* P < 0.05, **P < 0.001
噪声类型 Noise types | 噪声强度 Noise intensity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 Control | 40 dB | 50 dB | 60 dB | 70 dB | |
| 农村生活噪声 Rural noise | 1.86% ± 0.28%d | 7.83% ± 0.53%c | 16.60% ± 1.51%b | 25.02% ± 2.23%ab | 30.07% ± 2.50%a |
| 游客噪声 Tourists noise | 2.19% ± 0.29%c | 13.98% ± 1.50%b | 16.50% ± 1.34%b | 26.07% ± 2.36%a | 30.17% ± 2.67%a |
| 交通噪声 Traffic noise | 2.43% ± 0.34%c | 15.00% ± 1.79%b | 17.07% ± 1.40%b | 35.24% ± 3.64%a | 27.95% ± 2.50%a |
| 鸟类捕食者声音 Avian predator | 2.67% ± 0.37%c | 15.95% ± 1.81%b | 23.50% ± 2.09%a | 33.86% ± 2.92%a | 34.21% ± 3.03%a |
表2 黔金丝猴在不同声压级干扰时的警戒时间百分比
Table 2 Percentage of vigilance time of Guizhou snub-nosed monkey under different sound pressure level stimulation
噪声类型 Noise types | 噪声强度 Noise intensity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 Control | 40 dB | 50 dB | 60 dB | 70 dB | |
| 农村生活噪声 Rural noise | 1.86% ± 0.28%d | 7.83% ± 0.53%c | 16.60% ± 1.51%b | 25.02% ± 2.23%ab | 30.07% ± 2.50%a |
| 游客噪声 Tourists noise | 2.19% ± 0.29%c | 13.98% ± 1.50%b | 16.50% ± 1.34%b | 26.07% ± 2.36%a | 30.17% ± 2.67%a |
| 交通噪声 Traffic noise | 2.43% ± 0.34%c | 15.00% ± 1.79%b | 17.07% ± 1.40%b | 35.24% ± 3.64%a | 27.95% ± 2.50%a |
| 鸟类捕食者声音 Avian predator | 2.67% ± 0.37%c | 15.95% ± 1.81%b | 23.50% ± 2.09%a | 33.86% ± 2.92%a | 34.21% ± 3.03%a |
| Alecia J C, Harry H M, Robert H, Guy C. 2012. How not to measure boldness: novel object and antipredator responses are not the same in wild baboons [J]. Animal Behaviour, 84 (3): 603-609. | |
| Allan A T L, Bailey A L, Hill R A. 2020. Habituation is not neutral or equal: individual differences in tolerance suggest an overlooked personality trait [J]. Science Advances, 6 (28): eaaz0870. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz0870 . | |
| Audet J N, Ducatez S, Lefebvre L. 2015. The town bird and the country bird: problem solving and immunocompetence vary with urbanization [J]. Behavioral Ecology, 27 (2): 637-644. | |
| Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting lnear mixed‑effects models using lme4 [J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1): 1-48. | |
| Blackburn G, Ashton B J, Thornton A, Woodiss‑Field S, Ridley A R. 2023. Cognition mediates response to anthropogenic noise in wild Western Australian magpies (Gmynorhina tibicen dorsalis) [J]. Global Change Biology, 29 (24): 6912-6930. | |
| Bunkley J P, Mcclure C J W, Kawahara Y, Francis C D, Barber J R. 2017. Anthropogenic noise changes arthropod abundances [J]. Ecology and Evolution, 7 (9): 2977-2985. | |
| Campos F A, Fedigan L M. 2014. Spatial ecology of perceived predation risk and vigilance behavior in white‑faced capuchins [J]. Behavioral Ecology, 25 (3): 477-486. | |
| Chen H L, Koprowski J L. 2015. Animal occurrence and space use change in the landscape of anthropogenic noise [J]. Biological Conservation, 192: 315-322. | |
| Cronin K A, Bethell E J, Jacobson S L, Egelkamp C, Hopper L M, Ross S R. 2018. Evaluating mood changes in response to anthropogenic noise with a response‑slowing task in three species of zoo‑housed primates [J]. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 5 (2): 209-221. | |
| Daniel T B. 2016. Habituation and sensitization: new thoughts about old ideas [J]. Animal Behaviour, 120: 255-262. | |
| Dias P A D, Gómez E E E, Chavira R D R, Rangel N A. 2024. Noise intensity modulates the responses of mantled howler monkeys to anthropophony [J]. American Journal of Primatology, 86 (1): e23568.DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23568 . | |
| Duarte M H L, Vecci M A, Hirsch A, Young R J. 2011. Noisy human neighbours affect where urban monkeys live [J]. Biology Letters, 7 (6): 840-842. | |
| Duarte M H L, Kaizer M C, Young R J, Rodrigues M, Sousa‑Lima R S. 2018. Mining noise affects loud call structures and emission patterns of wild black‑fronted titi monkeys [J]. Primates, 59 (1): 89-97. | |
| Francis C D, Ortega C P, Cruz A. 2009. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions [J]. Current Biology, 19 (16): 1415-1419. | |
| Francis C D, Kleist N J, Ortega C P, Cruz A. 2012. Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279: 2727-2735. | |
| Francis C D, Barber J R. 2013. A framework for understanding noiseimpacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority [J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11 (6): 305-313. | |
| Grenat P, Michelli M, Pollo F, Otero M, Baraquet M, Martino A. 2023. Traffic noise and breeding site characteristics influencing assemblage composition of anuran species associated to roads [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 32 (6): 1931-1947. | |
| Hawkins E, Papworth S. 2022. Little evidence to support the risk‑disturbance hypothesis as an explanation for responses to anthropogenic noise by pygmy marmosets (Cebuella niveiventris) at a tourism site in the Peruvian Amazon [J]. International Journal of Primatology, 43 (6): 1110-1132. | |
| Huang X L, Meng B S, Li H B, Ran W, Yang W, Wang C, Xie B, Zhang X, Ran J C, Zhang M M. 2024. Interspecific associations between Rhinopithecus brelichi and its sympatric species using infrared cameras [J]. Biodiversity Science, 32 (2): 73-84.(in Chinese) | |
| Jakob‑Hoff R, Kingan M, Fenemore C, Schmid G, Cockrem J F, Crackle A, Bemmel E V, Connor R, Descovich K. 2019. Potential impact of construction noise on selected zoo animals [J]. Animals, 9 (8): 504.DOI: 10.3390/ani9080504 . | |
| Kolleck J, Yang M, Zinner D, Roos C. 2013. Genetic diversity in endangered Guizhou snub‑nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus brelichi): contrasting results from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA data [J]. PLoS ONE, 8 (8): e73647.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073647 . | |
| Lazerte S E, Otter K A, Slabbekoorn H. 2017. Mountain chickadees adjust songs, calls and chorus composition with increasing ambient and experimental anthropogenic noise [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 20 (5): 989-1000. | |
| Li J Y, Deng J, He X B, Tan K, Long X B, Li Y P, Huang Z P, Xiao W. 2021. The noise influence to black snub‑nosed monkeys (Rinopithecus bieti) during the development of ecotourism activities [J].Chinese Journal of Zoology, 56 (6): 801-807.(in Chinese) | |
| Li X J. 2023. Study on the response of Rhinopithecus brelichi habitat changes [D]. Master thesis. Guiyang: Guizhou University.(in Chinese) | |
| Löschner J, Pomberger T, Hage S R. 2023. Marmoset monkeys use different avoidance strategies to cope with ambient noise during vocal behavior [J]. iScience, 26 (3): 106219.DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106219 . | |
| Mcclure C J W, Ware H E, Carlisle J, Kaltenecker G, Barber J R. 2013. An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280 (1773): 20132290.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2290 . | |
| Niu K F, Tan C L, Yang Y Q. 2010. Altitudinal movements of Guizhou snub‑nosed monkeys (Rhinopihecus brelichi) in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, China: implicationsfor conservation management of a fagship species [J]. Folia Primatologica, 81: 233-244. | |
| Niu K F, Tan C L, Cui D Y, Shi L, Yang M Y, Qiu Y, Zhang W Y, Yang Y Q. 2014. Utilization of food on snow‑covered ground by Guizhou snub‑nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus brelichi) during winter in Fanjingshan Nature Reserve,China [J]. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 35 (1): 31-37. (in Chinese) | |
| Oliveira F G, Mathias M D L, Rychlik L, Tapisso J T, Merten S V. 2020. Metabolic and behavioral adaptations of greater white‑toothed shrews to urban conditions [J]. Behavioral Ecology, 31 (6): 1334-1343. | |
| Palacios G, Lowenstine L J, Cranfield M R, Gilardi K, Spelman L, Lukasik‑Braum M, Kinani J F, Mudakikwa A, Nyirakaragire E, Bussetti A V, Savji N, Hutchison S, Egholm M, Lipkin W. 2011. Human metapneumovirus infection in Wild Mountain Gorillas, Rwanda [J]. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17 (4): 711-713. | |
| Phillips J N, Termondt S E, Francis C D. 2021. Long‑term noise pollution affects seedling recruitment and community composition, with negative effects persisting after removal [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288 (1948): 20202906.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2906 . | |
| Proppe D S, Sturdy C B, St Ckair C C. 2011. Flexibility in animal signals facilitates adaptation to rapidly changing environments [J]. PLoS ONE, 6 (9): e25413.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025413 . | |
| Rachel T B, Mckenna M F, Menitt D, Fristrup K, Crooks K, Angeloni L, Wittemyer G. 2017. Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas [J]. Science, 356 (6337): 531-533. | |
| Robbins L, Margulis S W. 2014. The effects of auditory enrichment on gorillas [J]. Zoo Biology, 33 (3): 197-203. | |
| Santiago S C, Dias P A D, Garau S, Fuentes A C, Chavira Ramírez D R, Espinosa D C, Negrín A R. 2019. Behavioral and physiological stress responses to local spatial disturbance and human activities by howler monkeys at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico [J].Animal Conservation, 23 (3): 297-306. | |
| Shannon G, Angeloni L M, Wittemyer G, Fristrup K M, Crooks K R. 2014. Road traffic noise modifies behaviour of a keystone species [J]. Animal Behaviour, 94: 135-141. | |
| Shannon G, Mckenna M F, Angeloni L M, Crooks K R, Fristrup K M, Brown E, Warner K A, Nelson M D, White C, Briggs J, Mcfarland S, Wittemyer G. 2015. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife [J]. Biological Reviews, 91 (4): 982-1005. | |
| Sheehan R L, Papworth S. 2019. Human speech reduces pygmy marmoset (Cebuella pygmaea) feeding and resting at a Peruvian tourist site, with louder volumes decreasing visibility [J]. American Journal of Primatology, 81 (4): e22967.DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22967 . | |
| Siemers B M, Schaub A. 2011. Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278 (1712): 1646-1652. | |
| Smith J A, Gaynor K M, Suraci J P. 2021. Mismatch between risk and response may amplify lethal and non‑lethal effects of humans on wild animal populations [J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 604973.DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.604973 . | |
| Steinbrecher F, Dunn J C, Price E C, Buck L H, Wascher C A F, Ckark F E. 2023. The effect of anthropogenic noise on foraging and vigilance in zoo housed pied tamarins [J]. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 265: 105989.DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105989 . | |
| Uchida K, Suzuki K K, Shimamoto T, Yanagawa H, Koizumi I. 2019. Decreased vigilance or habituation to humans? Mechanisms on increased boldness in urban animals [J]. Behavioral Ecology, 30 (6): 1583-1590. | |
| Wang C, LiI H B, Yang Z H, Bi X, Fan H, Su H J, Hu C S, Zhang M M. 2022. Temporal and spatial distribution pattemns of Rhinopithecus brelichi and Macaca thibetana in the sameregion of the northeast Fanjingshan [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 58 (3): 117-128.(in Chinese) | |
| Wilson M C, Chen XY, Corlett R T, Didham K R, Ding P, Holt R D, Holyoakm, Hu G, Hughes A C, Jiang L, Laurance W F, Liu J J, Pimm S L, Robinson S K, Russo S E, Si X F, Wilcove D S, Wu J G, Yu M J. 2016. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges [J]. Landscape Ecology, 31: 219-227. | |
| Xiang Z, Liang W B, Nie S G, Li M. 2012. Diet and feeding behavior of Rhinopithecus brelichi at Yangaoping, Guizhou [J]. American Journal of Primatology, 74 (6): 551-560. | |
| Yang Y Q, Lei X P, Yang C D. 2002. Fanjing Mountain Research: The Wild Ecology of Guizhou Golden Monkey [M]. Guiyang: Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House.(in Chinese) | |
| Zeng X Q. 2018. Research on glucocorticoid and behavior adaptation strategies of Yunnan snub‑nosed monkey under human behaviors [D]. Master thesis. Nanchong: China West Normal University.(in Chinese) | |
| 王丞, 李海波, 杨朝辉, 毕兴, 樊涵, 粟海军, 胡灿实, 张明明.2022. 梵净山东北部同域黔金丝猴与藏酋猴的时空分布格局 [J]. 林业科学, 58 (3): 117-128. | |
| 牛克锋, Tan C L, 崔多英, 石磊, Yang M, 邱阳, 张维勇, 杨业勤.2014. 黔金丝猴 (Rhinopithecus brelichi) 雪季地表食物利用 [J].野生动物学报, 35 (1): 31-37. | |
| 李金燕, 邓静, 和晓斌, 谭坤, 龙晓斌, 李延鹏, 黄志旁, 肖文. 2021.生态旅游活动中游客噪声对滇金丝猴的影响 [J].动物学杂志, 56 (6): 801-807. | |
| 李晓婕. 2023. 黔金丝猴生境变化的响应研究 [D].贵阳: 贵州大学硕士学位论文. | |
| 杨业勤, 雷孝平, 杨传东.2002. 梵净山研究: 黔金丝猴的野外生态 [M]. 贵阳: 贵州科技出版社. | |
| 黄小龙, 蒙秉顺, 李海波, 冉伟, 杨伟, 王丞, 谢波, 张旭, 冉景丞, 张明明. 2024. 基于红外相机的黔金丝猴及其同域分布物种种间关联 [J]. 生物多样性, 32 (2): 73-84. | |
| 曾小琴. 2018. 人为干扰下滇金丝猴 (Rhinopithecus bieti) 皮质醇激素变化与行为适应策略研究 [D]. 南充: 西华师范大学硕士学位论文. |
| [1] | 聂永刚, 张超, 高华窈, 刘翰卿, 谢冰. 中国大中型陆生哺乳动物保护研究进展[J]. 兽类学报, 2025, 45(5): 559-576. |
| [2] | 蒋昀珂, 虞红莉, 王静, 朱奕丞, Tahir Abbas, 何孟周冉, 张焓榆, 刘汶沁, 邓迎春, 罗波. 灯光强度对东亚伏翼觅食行为的影响研究[J]. 兽类学报, 2025, 45(2): 185-192. |
| [3] | 李萍, 任宝平, 邓怀庆, 金崑, 李文永, 周江, 齐旭明. 海南长臂猿下地行为初报[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(5): 660-664. |
| [4] | 李毅, 王奕凯, 骆畅, 叶秀林, 吴忠荣, 匡中帆, 赵序茅. 贵阳市人猴冲突及其时空分布[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(4): 449-455. |
| [5] | 白小节, 肖文宏, 张廷跃, 刘邦友, 肖治术, 刘伟. 赤水桫椤自然保护区小灵猫及其潜在啮齿类猎物活动节律的季节适应格局[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(3): 309-320. |
| [6] | 黄小龙, 李海波, 张旭, 程绍传, 晏玉莹, 杨伟, 蒙秉顺, 王丞, 杨杰, 冉景丞. 梵净山同域分布黔金丝猴与藏酋猴的肠道微生物结构差异[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(2): 183-194. |
| [7] | 周晓, 杨波, 曾文, 李果, 杨长江, 王静, 谢庆阳, 刘怀庭, 王锐, 罗波, 张明春, 黄炎. 大熊猫母兽育幼早期应激水平与母幼行为的关系[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(2): 209-216. |
| [8] | 张洁, 陈仕望, 田红卫, 孙丙华, 王希, 夏东坡. 野生藏酋猴理毛行为与肠道寄生虫感染的关系[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(1): 50-57. |
| [9] | 韩梦亚, 田军东, 周言言, 王钰炜, 罗彤彤, 路纪琪. 太行山猕猴的性打搅行为[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(1): 65-76. |
| [10] | 何民强, 田军东, 李文韬, 路纪琪. 太行山猕猴的交配行为参数与模式[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(1): 77-84. |
| [11] | 李念隆, 赵海涛, 李炜, 王晓卫, 王程亮, 牟俊洁, 李保国. 非人灵长类的个性研究进展[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(1): 118-128. |
| [12] | 刘丽娜, 袁帅, 李鑫, 付和平, 武晓东. 阿拉善荒漠啮齿动物优势种觅食活动对不同放牧方式的响应[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(6): 689-701. |
| [13] | 刘若爽, 石建斌, 刘定震, 沈心晨, 王庆庆, 徐雪飞, 郭冬生, 董世魁, 张毓, 何玉邦, 吴永林. 普氏原羚警戒行为和生理应激的影响因素分析[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(5): 479-488. |
| [14] | 宋宇豪, 毕俊怀, 温苏雅勒图, 王国林, 李峰, 吕文兵, 周一凡, 潘幸幸, 张瑞东. 内蒙古乌拉特荒漠北山羊集群行为及季节变化[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(5): 544-552. |
| [15] | 林炜明, 翁悦, 阿家, 王敏, 王琦, 王放. 四川八月林自然保护区大灵猫日活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动响应的初步研究[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(4): 364-377. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
青公网安备 63010402000199号 青ICP备05000010号-2