食物偏好对哺乳期黑线仓鼠能量代谢和肠道菌群的影响

doi:10.16829/j.slxb.151095

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

食物的多样性和食物质量的季节性变化是野生小型哺乳动物必须应对的主要环境因子。哺乳期是动物能量需求最高的生活史阶段之一，在此期间对不同食物的选择偏好对确保哺乳期母体的能量需求和繁殖成功具有重要影响。本研究采用能量收支法和微生物16S rRNA基因测序，探讨了黑线仓鼠（Cricetulus barabensis）在哺乳期分别摄取高蛋白、高脂肪和高纤维食物对其能量摄入、繁殖输出及肠道菌群的影响。结果发现，黑线仓鼠显著偏好高脂食物，非繁殖期摄取高脂食物占总摄食量的59.8%，哺乳期高达78.1%，而标准维持鼠食物、高蛋白和高纤维食物仅占8.4%、3.3%和10.1%。与非繁殖期相比，哺乳期母体摄食量显著增加，静息代谢率亦显著提高，但自由选择食物的母体最大摄食量均未超过对照组水平。摄取高蛋白和高纤维食物母体的泌乳输出、幼体的胎仔质量均显著低于对照组和摄取高脂食物组。与非繁殖期相比，哺乳期母体的消化系统质量显著增加，摄取高纤维食物组的大肠和盲肠质量显著高于其他各组。盲肠厚壁菌门（Firmicutes）和拟杆菌门（Bacteroidota）为门水平上的优势菌群，与对照组相比，高蛋白食物组厚壁菌门相对丰度降低，而拟杆菌门相对丰度升高；高纤维食物组和高蛋白食物组α多样性（ASVs数量、Chao1指数和Shannon指数）显著降低，而高脂食物组和自由选择食物组未发生显著变化。结果表明，哺乳期黑线仓鼠对食物的选择具有显著的偏好，高蛋白食物具有较高食物特殊动力效应，可能是摄取比例较低的主要原因；消化系统可塑性可能达到瓶颈，在一定程度上限制了动物的选择偏好。摄取高纤维和高蛋白食物的母体未能通过增加能量摄入满足幼体的能量需求，泌乳能量支出显著降低是主要原因之一，这些变化可能与肠道微生物α多样性显著降低有关。食物资源可利用性的季节性变化对野生小型哺乳动物的季节性繁殖策略具有重要影响，仅利用高蛋白和高纤维食物会降低母体的繁殖价值。

关键词: 食物质量, 摄食量, 哺乳期, 泌乳支出, 季节性繁殖

Abstract:

Food diversity and seasonal variation in food quality are key environmental challenges for wild small mammals. Lactation represents one of the most energy-demanding life-history stages, during which dietary preferences are critical for meeting maternal energy needs and ensuring reproductive success. Using energy budget analysis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we examined the impacts of high-protein, high-fat, and high-fiber diets during lactation on energy intake, reproductive output, and gut microbiota in striped hamsters (Cricetulus barabensis). The hamsters showed a significant preference for high-fat food, which accounted for 59.8% of total intake in the non-reproductive period and rose to 78.1% during lactation. In contrast, control, high-protein, and high-fiber foods comprised only 8.4%, 3.3%, and 10.1% of intake, respectively. Lactating females exhibited significantly increased food intake and resting metabolic rate compared to the non-reproductive period. However, their maximum intake of each food type did not exceed that of the control group. Females on high-protein or high-fiber diets showed significantly lower lactation output and offspring body weights than those in the control and high-fat groups. Digestive system weight increased significantly during lactation. In the high-fiber group, both large intestine and cecum weights were significantly higher than in other groups. At the phylum level, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated the gut microbiota. Compared to the control group, the high-protein group had decreased Firmicutes and increased Bacteroidetes abundance. The alpha diversity (ASVs number, Chao1 index and Shannon index) was significantly decreased in the hamsters fed with high-fiber and high-protein diet, while it was not significantly changed in the hamsters fed with high-fat food diet and those fed with various types of food. These findings suggest that lactating striped hamsters exhibit strong dietary preferences. The higher specific dynamic action of high-protein food may explain their lower intake. Digestive system plasticity may also reach a limit, constraining dietary choices. The hamsters that were fed a high-fiber and high-protein diets failed to meet the energy needs of their offspring despite increasing their own energy intake, which was partly due to the significant decrease in milk energy output. These changes may be related to a significant decrease in the alpha diversity of the gut microbiota. Seasonal changes in food availability play a key role in shaping reproductive strategies in wild small mammals, and exclusive reliance on high-protein or high-fiber diets may compromise maternal reproductive performance.

Key words: Food quality, Food intake, Lactation, Milk energy output, Seasonal reproduction

中图分类号:

Q958.1

杜雅杰, 赵真, 张开元, 曹静, 赵志军. 食物偏好对哺乳期黑线仓鼠能量代谢和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2026, 46(5): 720-733.

Yajie DU, Zhen ZHAO, Kaiyuan ZHANG, Jing CAO, Zhijun ZHAO. The effect of food preference on energy metabolism and gut microbiota in lactating striped hamsters[J]. ACTA THERIOLOGICA SINICA, 2026, 46(5): 720-733.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.mammal.cn/CN/10.16829/j.slxb.151095

https://www.mammal.cn/CN/Y2026/V46/I5/720

图/表 7

图1 非繁殖组（NR）与哺乳组（Lac）黑线仓鼠的体质量和摄食量. Con：对照组；H-fiber：高纤维食物组；H-protein：高蛋白食物组；H-fat：高脂食物组；All-kind：自由选择食物组. P-Con、P-Hfiber、P-Hprotein和P-Hfat为黑线仓鼠每日各类食物摄食量. 折线图数据表示为平均值 ± 标准误，柱状图数据表示为平均值 ± 标准差. Pdiet 表示食物类型的影响. ** P < 0.01，*** P < 0.001；ns，P > 0.05

Fig. 1 Body mass and food intake of non-reproductive (NR) and lactating striped hamsters (Lac). Con: pellet chow diet was provided only; H-fiber: high-fiber diet was provided only; H-protein: high-protein diet was provided only; H-fat: high-fat diet was provided only; All-kind: the striped hamsters had free access to diet. P-Con, P-Hfiber, P-Hprotein and P-Hfat indicate the amount of food intake that hamsters preferred. Data are means ± SE for lines, and means ± SD for columns. Pdiet, effect of diet. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, non-significant effect (P > 0.05)

图2 非繁殖组（NR）与哺乳组（Lac）黑线仓鼠的静息代谢率（RMR）和泌乳能量支出（MEO）. A：母鼠整体RMR；B：母鼠单位体质量RMR；C：整窝幼仔RMR；D：幼仔单位体质量RMR；E：母鼠的泌乳能量支出. Con：对照组；H-fiber：高纤维食物组；H-protein：高蛋白食物组；H-fat：高脂食物组；All-kind：自由选择食物组.数据表示为平均值 ± 标准差. PLac 表示哺乳影响. ** P < 0.01，*** P < 0.001；ns，P > 0.05

Fig. 2 The resting metabolic rate (RMR) and milk energy output (MEO) of non-reproductive and/ or lactating striped hamsters (NR and Lac). A: RMR of females when expressed as per hamster; B: RMR of females when expressed as per gram; C: RMR of pups when expressed as per litter; D: RMR of pups when expressed as per gram of pups; E: MEO of females at peak lactation. Con: pellet chow diet was provided only; H-fiber: high-fiber diet was provided only; H-protein: high-protein diet was provided only; H-fat: high-fat diet was provided only; All-kind: the hamsters had free access to diet. Data are means ± SD. PLac, effect of lactation; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, non-significant effect (P > 0.05)

图3 哺乳期黑线仓鼠的胎仔数与胎仔质量. Con：对照组；H-fiber：高纤维食物组；H-protein：高蛋白食物组；H-fat：高脂食物组；All-kind：自由选择食物组. 折线图数据表示为平均值 ± 标准误，柱状图数据表示为平均值 ± 标准差. Pdiet 表示食物类型的影响. * P < 0.05，** P < 0.01，*** P < 0.001；ns，P > 0.05

Fig. 3 Litter size and litter mass of lactating striped hamsters. Con: pellet chow diet was provided only; H-fiber: high-fiber diet was provided only; H-protein: high-protein diet was provided only; H-fat: high-fat diet was provided only; All-kind: the striped hamsters had free access to diet. Data are means ± SE for lines, and means ± SD for columns. Pdiet, effect of diet. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, non-significant effect (P > 0.05)

图4 非繁殖组（NR）与哺乳组（Lac）黑线仓鼠的身体组成. Con：对照组；H-fiber：高纤维食物组；H-protein：高蛋白食物组；H-fat：高脂食物组；All-kind：自由选择食物组. 数据表示为平均值 ± 标准差. PLac 表示哺乳影响，Pdiet 表示食物类型的影响. * P < 0.05，** P < 0.01，*** P < 0.001

Fig. 4 Body composition of non-reproductive hamsters (NR) and lactating striped hamsters (Lac). Con: pellet chow diet was provided only; H-fiber: high-fiber diet was provided only; H-protein: high-protein diet was provided only; H-fat: high-fat diet was provided only; All-kind: the striped hamsters had free access to diet. Data are means ± SD. PLac, effect of lactation; Pdiet, effect of diet. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

图5 哺乳组黑线仓鼠肠道微生物群落的多样性. A：观测到的ASVs数量；B：Chao1指数反映的α多样性；C：Shannon指数反映的α多样性；D：稀释曲线反映的α多样性；E：Bray-Curtis距离反映的β多样性；F：Jaccard距离反映的β多样性；G、H：基于Bray-Curtis距离与Jaccard距离的PCoA表示5组肠道微生物群落组成的差异化分布模式. Con：对照组；H-fiber：高纤维食物组；H-protein：高蛋白食物组；H-fat：高脂食物组；All-kind：自由选择食物组. 群落多样性分析基于5组的ASVs数量. * P < 0.05，** P < 0.01，*** P < 0.001；ns，P > 0.05

Fig. 5 The community diversity of gut microbiota in lactating striped hamsters. A: Observed amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) number; B: the alpha diversity in chao1 index; C: the alpha diversity in shannon index; D: alpha diversity in dilution curve; E: the beta diversity in bray curtis distance; F: the beta diversity in jaccard distance; G, H: the Principal Co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) with Bray-Curtis distance and Jaccard distance shows the patterns of separation of gut microbiota community from the 5 groups in. Con: pellet chow diet was provided only; H-fiber: high-fiber diet was provided only; H-protein: high-protein diet was provided only; H-fat: high-fat diet was provided only; All-kind: the striped hamsters had free access to diet. The community diversity was analyzed based on the ASVs number in the 5 groups. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, non-significant effect (P > 0.05)

图6 哺乳组黑线仓鼠肠道微生物的相对丰度. A：丰度排名前十的菌门；B：丰度排名前十的菌种；C：种水平的Venn图；D、E：前十大菌门与前十大菌种的聚类热图. Con：对照组；H-fiber：高纤维食物组；H-protein：高蛋白食物组；H-fat：高脂食物组；All-kind：自由选择食物组. 相对丰度分析基于5组母鼠的ASV数量

Fig. 6 Relative abundance of gut microbiota in lactating striped hamsters. A: the top ten phylum microbiota; B: the top ten species microbiota; C: the Venn figure of species microbiota; D, E: the cluster heatmap of top ten phylum microbiota and top ten species microbiota. Con: pellet chow diet was provided only; H-fiber: high-fiber diet was provided only; H-protein: high-protein diet was provided only; H-fat: high-fat diet was provided only; All-kind: the striped hamsters had free access to diet. The relative abundance was analyzed based on the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) number of each hamster in the 5 groups

图7 哺乳组黑线仓鼠肠道微生物丰度及预测功能差异. A ~ D：丰度排名前十的菌门的倍数变化；E ~ H：特定菌门对组间差异的贡献；I：肠道微生物预测功能的相对丰度；J：基于ASVs的微生物预测功能Venn图；K：肠道微生物预测功能的主成分分析. Con：对照组；H-fiber：高纤维食物组；H-protein：高蛋白食物组；H-fat：高脂食物组；All-kind：自由选择食物组. * P < 0.05，** P < 0.01，*** P < 0.001

Fig. 7 The differences in the abundance and the predicted function of gut microbiota in lactating striped hamsters. A - D: the fold changes in the top 10 phylum microbiota; E - H: the contributions of the specific phylum microbiota to the difference between the two groups; I: the relative abundance of the predicted function of gut microbiota; J: the Venn figure of predicted function of microbiota based on the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs); K: the principal components analysis (PCA) of the predicted function of gut microbiota. Con: pellet chow diet was provided only; H-fiber: high-fiber diet was provided only; H-protein: high-protein diet was provided only; H-fat: high-fat diet was provided only; All-kind: the striped hamsters had free access to diet. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

参考文献

	Bäckhed F， Ley R E， Sonnenburg J L， Peterson D A， Gordon J I，2005. Host‑bacterial mutualism in the human intestine［J］. Science，307（5717）：1915‑1920. DOI：10.1126/science. 1104816 .
	Blanco A M， Calo J， Soengas J L，2021. The gut‑brain axis in vertebrates：implications for food intake regulation［J］. Journal of Experimental Biology，224（1）：jeb231571. DOI：10.1242/jeb.231571 .
	Bo T B， Zhang X Y， Kohl K D， Wen J， Tian S J， Wang D H，2020. Coprophagy prevention alters microbiome，metabolism，neurochemistry，and cognitive behavior in a small mammal［J］. The ISME Journal，14（10）：2625‑2645. DOI：10.1038/s41396-020-0711-6 .
	Bokulich N A， Subramanian S， Faith J J， Gevers D， Gordon J I， Knight R， Mills D A， Caporaso J G，2013. Quality‑filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing［J］. Nature Methods，10（1）：57‑59. DOI：10.1038/NMETH.2276 .
	Bruce‑Keller A J， Fernandez‑Kim S O， Townsend R L， Kruger C， Carmouche R， Newman S， Salbaum J M， Berthoud H R，2017. Maternal obese‑type gut microbiota differentially impact cognition，anxiety and compulsive behavior in male and female offspring in mice［J］. PLoS ONE，12（4）：e0175577. DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0175577 .
	Daniel H， Gholami AM， Berry D， Desmarchelier C， Hahne H， Loh G， Mondot S， Lepage P， Rothballer M， Walker A， Böhm C， Wenning M， Wagner M， Blaut M， Schmitt‑Kopplin S， Kuster B， Haller D， Clavel T，2014. High‑fat diet alters gut microbiota physiology in mice［J］. The ISME Journal，8（2）：295‑308. DOI：10.4161/gmic.29331 .
	de Noronha S I S R， de Moraes L A G， Hassell J E Jr，et al.，2024. High‑fat diet，microbiome‑gut‑brain axis signaling，and anxiety‑like behavior in male rats［J］. Biological Research，57（1）：23. DOI：10.1186/s40659-024-00505-1 .
	Edgar R C， Haas B J， Clemente J C， Quince C， Knight R，2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics，27（16）：2194‑2200. DOI：10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 .
	Flint H J，2011. Obesity and the gut microbiota［J］. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology，45：S128‑S132. DOI：10.1097/MCG. 0b013e31821f44c4 .
	Hammond K A， Diamond J，1997. Maximal sustained energy budgets in humans and animals［J］. Nature，386：457‑462. DOI：10.1038/386457a0 .
	Huang Y， Mendoza J O， Hambly C， Li B， Jin Z， Li L， Madizi M， Hu S， Speakman J R，2020. Limits to sustained energy intake. XXXI. Effect of graded levels of dietary fat on lactation performance in Swiss mice［J］. Journal of Experimental Biology，22：223（Pt 10）：jeb221911. DOI：10.1242/jeb.221911 .
	Johnson M S， Thomson S C， Speakman J R，2001. Limits to sustained energy intake. II. Inter‑relationships between resting metabolic rate，life‑history traits and morphology in Mus musculus ［J］. Journal of Experimental Biology，204：1937‑1946. DOI：10.1007/s00360-005-0013-3 .
	Kagya‑Agyemang J K， Krol E， Speakman J R，2010. Effects of macronutrient composition on specific dynamic action in the laboratory mouse，Mus musculus ［J］. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences，16：39‑45. DOI：10.4314/gjpas.v16i1.62808 .
	Król E， Johnson M S， Speakman J R，2003. Limits to sustained energy intake. VIII. Resting metabolic rate and organ morphology of laboratory mice lactating at thermoneutrality［J］. Journal of Experimental Biology，206：4283‑4291. DOI：10.1242/jeb. 00676 .
	Król E， Speakman J R，2003. Limits to sustained energy intake VII. Milk energy output in laboratory mice at thermoneutrality［J］. Journal of Experimental Biology，206：4267‑4281. DOI：10.1242/jeb.00675 .
	Leon M， Woodside B，1983. Energetic limits on reproduction：maternal food intake［J］. Physiology & Behavior，30：945‑957. DOI：10.1016/0031-9384（83）90260-3 .
	Ley R E， Turnbaugh P J， Klein S， Gordon J I，2006. Microbial ecology：human gut microbes associated with obesity［J］. Nature，444（7122）：1022‑1023. DOI：10.1038/4441022a .
	Liao S， Tan S， Jiang M， Wen J， Liu J， Cao J， Li M， Zhao Z，2023. Temperature determines the shift of thermal neutral zone and influences thermogenic capacity in striped hamsters［J］. Integrative Zoology，18（2）：353‑371. DOI：10.1111/1749-4877.12678 .
	Liu W， Zhao Z J，2022. The thermal neutral zone is shifted during lactation in striped hamsters［J］. The Journal of Thermal Biology，108：103303. DOI：10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103303 .
	Magoč T， Salzberg S L，2011. FLASH：fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies［J］. Bioinformatics，27（21）：2957‑2963. DOI：10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 .
	McCabe G M， Fedigan L M，2007. Effects of reproductive status on energy intake，ingestion rates，and dietary composition of female Cebus capucinus at Santa Rosa，Costa Rica［J］. The International Journal of Primatology，28（4）：837‑851. DOI：10.1007/s10764-007-9159-z .
	Snelson M， Clarke R E， Nguyen T V， Penfold S A， Forbes J M， Tan S M， Coughlan M T，2021. Long term high protein diet feeding alters the microbiome and increases intestinal permeability，systemic inflammation and kidney injury in mice［J］. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research，65（8）：e2000851. DOI：10.1002/mnfr.202000851 .
	So D， Whelan K， Rossi M， Morrison M， Holtmann G， Kelly J T， Shanahan E R， Staudacher H M， Campbell K L，2018. Dietary fiber intervention on gut microbiota composition in healthy adults：a systematic review and meta‑analysis［J］. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition，107（6）：965‑983. DOI：10.1093/ajcn/nqy041 .
	Song Z G， Wang D H，2003. Metabolism and thermoregulation in the striped hamster Cricetulus barabensis ［J］. The Journal of Thermal Biology，28（6‑7）：509‑514. DOI：10.1016/S0306-4565（03）00051-2 .
	Speakman J R， Gidney A， Bett J， Mitchell I P， Johnson M S，2001. Limits to sustained energy intake. IV. Effect of variation in food quality on lactating mice Mus musculus ［J］. Journal of Experimental Biology，204：1957‑1965.
	Steegenga W T， Mischke M， Lute C，et al.，2017. Maternal exposure to a western‑style diet causes differences in intestinal microbiota composition and gene expression of suckling mouse pups［J］. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research，61（1）：1600141. DOI：10.1002/mnfr.201600141 .
	Stojanov S， Berlec A， Štrukelj B，2020. The influence of probiotics on the firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease［J］. Microorganisms，8（11）：1715. DOI：10.3390/microorganisms8111715 .
	Thompson S D， Nicoll M E，1986. Basal metabolic rate and energetics of reproduction in therian mammals［J］. Nature，321（6071）：690‑693. DOI：10.1038/321690a0 .
	Turnbaugh P J， Hamady M， Yatsunenko T，et al.，2009. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins［J］. Nature，457（7228）：480‑484. DOI：10.1038/nature07540 .
	Turnbaugh P J， Ley R E， Mahowald M A， Magrini V， Mardis E R， Gordon J I，2006. An obesity‑associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest［J］. Nature，444（7122）：1027‑1031. DOI：10.1038/nature05414 .
	Van Hul M， Cani P D，2023. The gut microbiota in obesity and weight management：microbes as friends or foe？［J］. Nature Reviews Endocrinology，19（5）：258‑271. DOI：10.1038/s41574-022-00794-0 .
	Wang Dehua，2011. Some progress in mammalian physiological ecology in China［J］. Acta Theriologica Sinica，31（1）：15‑19. DOI：10.16829/j.slxb.2011.01.005. （in Chinese with English abstract）
	Wang Dehua， Zhao Zhijun， Zhang Xueying， Zhang Zhiqiang， Xu Deli， Xing Xin， Yang Shengmei， Wang Zhengkun， Gao Yunfang， Yang Ming，2021. Research advances and prespectives in mammal physiological ecology in China［J］. Acta Theriologica Sinica，41（5）：537‑555. DOI：10.16829/j.slxb.150558. （in Chinese with English abstract）
	Weitten M， Tissier M L， Robin J P， Habold C，2018. Dietary proteins improve hibernation and subsequent reproduction in the European hamster，Cricetus cricetus ［J］. The American Journal of Physiologye，315（4）：R848‑R855. DOI：10.1152/ajpregu. 00146.2018 .
	Yang D B， Li L， Wang L P， Chi Q S， Hambly C， Wang D H， Speakman J R，2013. Limits to sustained energy intake. XIX. A test of the heat dissipation limitation hypothesis in Mongolian gerbils（Meriones unguiculatus）［J］. Journal of Experimental Biology，216（17）：3358‑3368. DOI：10.1242/jeb.085233 .
	Zhang X Y， Lou M F， Shen W， Fu R S， Wang D H，2017. A Maternal low‑fiber diet predisposes offspring to improved metabolic phenotypes in adulthood in an herbivorous rodent［J］. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology，90（1）：75‑84. DOI：10.1086/688978 .
	Zhang X Y， Sukhchuluun G， Bo T B， Chi Q S， Yang J J， Chen B， Zhang L， Wang D H，2018. Huddling remodels gut microbiota to reduce energy requirements in a small mammal species during cold exposure［J］. Microbiome，6：103. DOI：10.1186/s40168-018-0473-9 .
	Zhao Z J， Hambly C， Shi L L， Bi Z， Cao J， Speakman J R，2020. Late lactation in small mammals is a critically sensitive window of vulnerability to elevated ambient temperature［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，117（39）：24352‑24358. DOI：10.1073/pnas.2008974117 .
	Zhao Z， Cao J . Niu C， Bao M， Xu J， Huo D， Liao S， Liu W， Speakman J R，2022. Body temperature is a more important modulator of lifespan than metabolic rate in two small mammals［J］. Nature Metabolism，4（3）：320‑326. DOI：10.1038/s42255-022-00545-5 .
	Zhao Zhen， Zhang Kaiyuan， Yang Rui， Cao Jing， Zhao Zhijun，2024. The effect of high‑fiber diet on energy budget in striped hamsters during lactation［J］. Acta Theriologica Sinica，44（4）：436‑448. DOI：10.16829/j.slxb.150868. （in Chinese with English abstract）
	王德华，2011. 我国哺乳动物生理生态学的一些进展和未来发展的建议［J］. 兽类学报，31（1）：15‑19. DOI：10.16829/j.slxb. 2011.01.005 .
	王德华，赵志军，张学英，张志强，徐德立，邢昕，杨生妹，王政昆，高云芳，杨明，2021. 中国哺乳动物生理生态学研究进展与展望［J］. 兽类学报，41（5）：537‑555. DOI：10.16829/j.slxb.150558 .
	张知彬，王祖望，1998.农业重要害鼠的生态学及控制对策［M］. 北京：海洋出版社.
	赵真，张开元，杨瑞，曹静，赵志军，2024. 高纤维食物对黑线仓鼠哺乳期能量收支的影响［J］. 兽类学报，44（4）：436‑448. DOI：10.16829/j.slxb.150868 .

[1]	李红娟, 王德华, 王振山, 张学英. 哺乳期高温经历导致布氏田鼠F1代的热中性区变窄[J]. 兽类学报, 2023, 43(4): 412-421.
[2]	安康, 包明芳, 姚宝辉, 康宇坤, 谭宇尘, 王艳莉, 苏军虎. MTNR1a和MTNR1b基因在繁殖期与非繁殖期雄性高原鼢鼠HPG轴上的表达[J]. 兽类学报, 2022, 42(4): 410-419.
[3]	余静欣邓光敏鲍雨帆赵志军. 黑线仓鼠断乳后能量代谢和脂肪累积的适应性调节[J]. 兽类学报, 2020, 40(6): 595-605.
[4]	安晓宇王玉军李永昌贾功雪杨其恩. 高原鼢鼠精子发生的形态学特征和关键调控因子探究[J]. 兽类学报, 2020, 40(5): 435-445.
[5]	王玉军贾功雪王婷王秀蓉刘忠浩都玉蓉马建滨. 光周期-褪黑素信号调控高原鼠兔精原细胞分化和季节性精子发生[J]. 兽类学报, 2020, 40(1): 54-63.
[6]	尹飞秦姣陈毅苏欠欠雷霆张春兰刘全生. 食物营养成分变化对卡氏小鼠和黄毛鼠摄食消化的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(6): 670-677.
[7]	赵园春张学英王德华. 布氏田鼠哺乳期低温经历抑制成年期神经再生[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(5): 485-495.
[8]	张宇飞曹满园王丽英赵伟刚许保增. 水貂睾丸退化期间TGFB家族生长因子及其受体基因表达量的变化[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(2): 191-201.
[9]	王梦阳黎勇周密盛岩孟秀祥. 圈养马麝幼仔哺乳期时间分配及影响因素[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(1): 35-42.
[10]	彭兴文刘奇何向阳张琴刘会梁捷孙云霄刘志霄张礼标. 乙醇浓度对圈养长舌果蝠摄食糖水量的影响[J]. 兽类学报, 2016, 36(4): 464-468.
[11]	夏凡朱平芬李明任宝平. 白马雪山自然保护区响古箐滇金丝猴（Rhinopithecus bieti）的交配行为[J]. 兽类学报, 2016, 36(1): 1-14.
[12]	何永果宋仕贤马凯冯莉李德生刘定震. 哺乳期圈养雌性大熊猫圈舍转移及其育幼行为变化[J]. 兽类学报, 2015, 35(3): 342-347.
[13]	张志强黄淑丽赵志军. 不同繁殖状态雌性黑线仓鼠对植物血凝素的反应模式[J]. 兽类学报, 2015, 35(1): 74-79.
[14]	刘全生, 冯志勇, 龚鹏博, 秦姣, 高志祥,黄小丽, 姚丹丹, 颜世祥. 高纤维食物对黄毛鼠摄食和消化的影响[J]. , 2010, 30(3): 291-296.
[15]	张志强, 刘全生, 王德华. 长爪沙鼠肠道5-羟色胺细胞密度的季节变化[J]. , 2009, 29(2): 167-171.